Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 13–25 | Cite as

The Virtual Scylla: an exploration of “serious games”, artificial life and simulation complexity

  • Robert Stone
  • David White
  • Robert Guest
  • Benjamin Francis
SI: Serious Gaming

Abstract

This paper addresses the integration of artificial life simulations with interactive games-based technologies and describes how the results are being exploited not only for scientific visualisation and education, but also for fundamental research into simulation complexity, focusing on the behavioural representation of species in fragile or long-vanished landscapes and ecosystems. Earlier research is described that supported the development of a virtual recreation of a submerged Mesolithic river valley, discovered during petrochemical surveys of the Southern Basin of the North Sea. Using pollen sample records and vegetation predictions from previous studies, a new alife “engine” was developed that simulated the interaction between “artificialised” vegetation and environmental factors, thus helping researchers to postulate pre-glacial melting migratory and settlement patterns of ancient civilisations from continental Europe to the British Isles. More recently, and to take advantage of the existence of a more accessible and living ecosystem, work has been conducted in collaboration with the UK’s National Marine Aquarium, this time focusing on the Scylla Artificial Reef—a Royal Navy frigate scuttled off the coast of Cornwall in South West England. The resulting “serious games”-based test beds are now providing the foundation for scientific investigations into how models and simulations of marine ecologies behave under different measures of complexity. The exploitation of the artificial life and underwater rendering efforts in others areas, including education and naval training, are also described.

Keywords

Serious games Virtual heritage Artificial life Marine biology Climate change Simulation complexity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge contributions to the Virtual Scylla project from Debbie Snelling, Gareth Shaw and Paul Cox of the National Marine Aquarium, Dr Keith Hiscock of the Marine Biological Association, Dr Jason Hall-Spencer (University of Plymouth Marine Institute), Cdr Andy Waddington (Royal Navy Hydrographic, Meteorological and Oceanographic Training Group) and Mark Gormley (MEng student at the University of Birmingham). The previous alife research of Dr Eugene Ch’ng, now at the University of Wolverhampton is also acknowledged. The catalyst for Phase 1 of the Virtual Scylla project was a Royal Academy of Engineering grant to develop teaching in Integrated Systems Design. (based at the University of Plymouth and involving two of the authors—Robert Stone and Robert Guest). Phase 2 of the project was part-funded by Advantage West Midlands, via an Interactive Digital Media project coordinated by Birmingham City University.

References

  1. Benford S, Greenhalgh C, Rodden T, Pycock J (2001) Collaborative virtual environments. Commun ACM 44(7):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G (2000) Swarm smarts. Sci Am 282:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouras Ch, Panagopoulos A, Tsiatsos TH (2005) Advances in X3D multi-user virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international symposium on multimedia (ISM ‘05). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 136–142Google Scholar
  4. Brooks RJ, Tobias AM (1999) Methods and benefits of simplification in simulation. In: Proceedings of the UK Simulation Society. UKSIM, Nottingham, pp 88–92Google Scholar
  5. CEFAS (2005) Environmental impacts resulting from disposal of dredged material at the Rame Head disposal site, S.W. England: an analysis of existing data and implications for environmental management. Multidisciplinary contract research report for the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS Contract BA004). http://www.cefas.co.uk/media/29994/20050602_rame_head_report.pdf. Cited 14 Oct 2008
  6. Ch’ng E, Stone RJ (2006) Enhancing virtual reality with artificial life: reconstructing a flooded European Mesolithic landscape. Presence 15(3):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ch’ng E, Stone RJ, Arvanitis TN (2004) The Shotton River and Mesolithic dwellings: recreating the past from geo-seismic data sources. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and cultural heritage, VAST04. The Eurographics Association, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Ch’ng E, Stone RJ, Arvanitis TN (2005) A virtual reality archaeological framework for the investigation and interpretation of ancient landscapes. In: Proceedings of internet and multimedia systems and applications, EuroIMSA 2005. IASTED, GrindelwaldGoogle Scholar
  9. Chwif L, Barretto MRP, Paul RJ (2000) On simulation model complexity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd conference on winter simulation. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 449–455Google Scholar
  10. Clark JGD (1936) The Mesolithic settlement of Northern Europe: a study of the food-gathering peoples of Northern Europe during the early post-glacial period. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Flack S, Rowland C (2006) Visualising the invisible: visualising historic shipwrecks. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 40(3). http://www.siggraph.org/publications/newsletter/
  12. Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Johnson CR (2003) Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hiscock K, Tyler-Walters H (2006) Assessing the sensitivity of seabed species and biotopes—the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Hydrobiologia 555:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland JH (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Helix Books/Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland JH (1998) Emergence from chaos to order. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kauffman S (1996) At home in the universe: the search for laws of complexity. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim KJ, Cho SB (2006) A comprehensive overview of the applications of artificial life. Artif Life 12:153–182CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Kube CR, Zhang H (1993) Collective robotics: from social insects to robots. Adapt Behav 2(2):189–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langton CG (1986) Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Evolution, games and learning: models of adaptation in machines and nature. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Langton CG (ed) (1989) Artificial life. In: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
  21. Langton CG (ed) (1995) Artificial life: an overview. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Leece (2006) Sinking a frigate. Ingenia 29:27–32Google Scholar
  23. Lentczner M (2008) Second life grid open grid protocol draft 1. Linden Lab Publication, San Francisco. http://secondlifegrid.net.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/specs/SLGOGP-draft-1.html. Cited 10 Oct 2008
  24. Lewin R (1993) Complexity: life on the edge of chaos. Phoenix, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. OpenSim (2008) OpenSim. http://opensimulator.org. Cited 10 Oct 2008
  26. Refsland ST, Ojika T, Defanti T, Johnson A, Leigh J, Loeffler C, Tu X, Heudin JC (1998) Virtual Great Barrier Reef: a theoretical approach towards an evolving, interactive VR environment using a distributed DOME and CAVE system. In Virtual Worlds ‘98. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence no. 1434. Springer, Paris, pp 323–336Google Scholar
  27. Reid C (1913) Submerged forests. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Resnick M (1994) Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: explorations in massively parallel microworlds. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Roberts P, Trow S (2002) Taking to the water: English Heritage’s initial policy for the management of maritime archaeology in England. English Heritage, London. [Crown Copyright. NMR (15044/14)]Google Scholar
  30. Robinson S (2006) Conceptual modeling for simulation: issues and research requirements. In: Proceedings of the 38th conference on winter simulation, Monterey, California, pp 792–800Google Scholar
  31. Snelling D (2006) The Scylla monitoring programme 2004–2006. Report compiled for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)/National Marine Aquarium, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  32. Spikins P (1999) Mesolithic Northern England: environment, population and settlement. BAR British Series 283. Basingstoke Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Stone RJ (1999) Virtual heritage: the willing suspension of disbelief for the moment. World Heritage Review. UNESCO, Madrid, pp 18–27Google Scholar
  34. Stone RJ (2005) Serious gaming—virtual reality’s saviour? In: Proceedings of Virtual Systems and MultiMedia annual conference, VSMM 2005. VSSM, Ghent, 773–786Google Scholar
  35. Von Neumann J, Burks AW (1966) Theory of self-reproducing automata. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  36. Waddington C (2003) Howick and East Barns. Curr Archaeol XVI(9):189Google Scholar
  37. Waldrop MM (1993) Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Viking, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Web3D Consortium (2008) Web3D Consortium. http://web3d.org. Cited 10 Oct 2008

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Stone
    • 1
  • David White
    • 1
  • Robert Guest
    • 1
  • Benjamin Francis
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Interface Technologies Team, School of Electronic, Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations