Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 7, Issue 3–4, pp 212–221 | Cite as

Usability issues in the design of an intuitive interface for planning and simulating maintenance interventions using a virtual environment

  • Angélica de Antonio
  • Ricardo Imbert
  • Jaime Ramírez
  • Xavier Ferré
Original Article

Abstract

This paper presents some of the results obtained in the VRIMOR project (virtual reality for inspection, maintenance, operation and repair of nuclear power plants). The general aim was to integrate environmental scanning technologies with human modelling and radiological dose estimation tools, and to deliver an intuitive and cost-effective system for use by operators involved with interventions in radiologically controlled areas. The usability of the resulting products was one of the main success criteria. This paper describes the general approach and design mechanisms used in the HeSPI (HeSPI stands for the Spanish for Herramienta para la Simulación y Planificación de Intervenciones, or tool for the simulation and planning of interventions) tool that has been developed by one of the teams. The tool provides the designer of an intervention with a humanoid 3D model, or mannequin, that can be loaded into the desired environment and will be used by the designer as if he was manipulating a puppet, making it move around the environment and perform different kinds of actions, adopting varied postures, interacting with the objects in the environment and manipulating tools and equipment. A combination of a graphical user interface (GUI) and a voice recognition system, together with the selected design mechanisms, has proven to offer good enough interaction possibilities for this kind of desktop virtual environment.

Keywords

Planning and design of interventions Object manipulation Voice recognition Generic actions Usability of desktop virtual environments 

References

  1. 1.
    de Antonio A, Ferré X, Ramírez J (2003) Combining virtual reality with an easy to use and learn interface in a tool for planning and simulating interventions in radiologically controlled areas. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human computer interaction (HCI 2003), Crete, Greece, June 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman DA, Johnson DB, Hodges LF (2001) Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Presence Teleop Virt 10(1):75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granieri JP, Badler NI (1994) Simulating humans in VR. In: Jones H, Earnshaw R, Vince J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on applications of virtual reality (The British Computer Society)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hindmarsh J, Fraser M, Heath C, Benford S, Greenhalgh C (2000) Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments. ACM T Comput Hum Int (TOCHI) (Special issue on human-computer interaction and collaborative virtual environments) 7(4):477–509Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamm C, Helander M (1997) Design issues for interfaces using voice Input. In: Helander M et al (eds) Handbook of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee D, Salve R, de Antonio A, Herrero P, Pérez JM, Vermeersch F, Dalton G (2001) Virtual reality for inspection, maintenance, operation and repair of nuclear power plant. In: Proceedings of the EU research in reactor safety mid-term symposium on shared-cost and concerted actions FISA 2001, Luxembourg, November 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mine MR (1995) Virtual environment interaction techniques. Technical report TR95-018. Department of Computer Science, University of North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poupyrev I, Billinghurst M, Weghorst S, Ichikawa T (1996) The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST’96), Seattle, Washington, November 1996Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rickel J, Johnson WL (1999) Virtual humans for team training in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on AI in education (AI-ED’99), LeMans, France, July 1999. IOS Press, pp 578–585Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneiderman B (1998) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vrimor Consortium (2003) Technological and user perspective review report. VRIMOR Project Deliverable D5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angélica de Antonio
    • 1
  • Ricardo Imbert
    • 1
  • Jaime Ramírez
    • 1
  • Xavier Ferré
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de InformáticaUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus de Montegancedo s/nMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations