Notfall & Rettungsmedizin

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 123–128 | Cite as

Supraglottische Beatmungshilfen in der Notfallmedizin

Rettungsdienst
  • 103 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Die Sicherung der Atemwege bei Notfallpatienten ist zentrales Kriterium einer suffizienten präklinischen Therapie. Das zuverlässige Beherrschen alternativer Techniken zur Sicherung der Atemwege gestattet die Oxygenierung und Ventilation des Patienten, wenn Routineverfahren—in der Regel die endotracheale Intubation—nicht erfolgreich sind. Mindestens eine der im Folgenden diskutierten supraglottischen Beatmungshilfen sollte deshalb für jeden Notfallpatienten unmittelbar zur Verfügung stehen.

Der Kombitubus ebenso wie der EasyTube besitzen 2 Lumina und können sowohl blind manuell als auch mit Hilfe eines Laryngoskops platziert werden. Larynxtubus und Larynxmaske ermöglichen eine Ventilation des Patienten nach manueller Positionierung. Jede dieser supraglottischen Beatmungshilfen kennzeichnet bestimmte Vor- und Nachteile, die vor dem Einsatz bei Notfallpatienten gegeneinander abgewogen werden müssen. Wegen der großen Vielfalt der zur Verfügung stehenden Techniken bedarf es generell eines planmäßigen Vorgehens im Rahmen eines Algorithmus. Dieser dient neben der Vorbereitung der Ausrüstung und der Schulung des Personals auch einer effizienten Entscheidungsfindung während des Handelns unter Zeitnot.

Schlüsselwörter

Kombitubus Larynxmaske Larynxtubus EasyTube Intubation Atemwegsmanagement 

Supraglottic airway devices in emergency medicine

Abstract

Complications related to airway management in the prehospital setting are frequent and, because of the importance and vulnerability of the ventilatory system, can be life threatening within a very short time. Therefore, airway management ensuring oxygenation and ventilation of the patient as well as protecting the airway against aspiration is perhaps the key component in the treatment of any prehospital emergency patient. Alternatives to endotracheal intubation such as supraglottic airway devices should be available immediately if standard techniques fail.

Both the esophageal-tracheal Combitube and the EasyTube consist of two lumina; therefore, ventilation of the patient can be provided after oesophageal as well as tracheal placement of its tips. Both devices can be positioned by the help of a laryngoscope or using a blind, manual technique. Laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask enable ventilating a patient after manual placement of the devices. For all supraglottic devices, individual advantages as well as disadvantages are to be discussed for the use in emergency patients. Because of the number of existing techniques, a systematic approach following an algorithm is recommended to manage the difficult airway. The algorithm enables to prepare the equipment well in advance and train the personnel. Most importantly, algorithms serve as a guideline to efficiently solve airway management problems in emergency patients.

Keywords

Combitube Larynxtube Laryngeal mask EasyTube Intubation Airway management 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf eine Verbindung mit folgender Firma/Firmen hin: die Autoren haben klinische Studien zur Evaluierung des EasyTubes durchgeführt, die von Teleflex Medical unterstützt wurden.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Baskett PJF, Bossaert L, Carli P et al. (1996) Guidelines for the advanced management of the airway and ventilation during resuscitation. Resuscitation 31: 201–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    (2000) Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Adjuncts for Oxygenation, Ventilation and Airway Control. Circulation 102: I-95–I-104Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thierbach A, Lipp M, Dick W (1997) Management der Atemwege im Notfall. Notfallmedizin 23: 408–411Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frass M, Frenzer R, Zdrahal F, Hoflehner G, Porges P, Lackner F (1987) The esophageal tracheal combitube: preliminary results with a new airway for CPR. Ann Emerg Med 16: 768–772Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frass M, Frenzer R, Rauscha F, Weber H, Pacher R, Leithner C (1987) Evaluation of esophageal tracheal combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 15: 609–611Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staudinger T, Tesinsky P, Klappacher G et al. (1995) Emergency intubation with the Combitube in two cases of difficult airway management. Eur J Anaesth 12: 189–193Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banyai M, Falger S, Roggla M et al. (1993) Emergency intubation with the Combitube in a grossly obese patient with bull neck. Resuscitation 26: 271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabitsch W, Krafft P, Lackner FX, Frenzer R, Hofbauer R, Sherif C, Frass M (2004) Evaluation of the oesophageal-tracheal double-lumen tube (Combitube) during general anaesthesia. Wien Klin Wochenschr 116: 90–93Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Mostafa S et al. (2001) The Combitube in elective surgery: a report of 200 cases. Anesthesiology 94: 79–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lefrancois DP, Dufour DG (2002) Use of the esophageal tracheal combitube by basic emergency medical technicians. Resuscitation 52: 77–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agro F, Frass M, Benumof JL, Krafft P (2002) Current status of the Combitube: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 14: 307–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wahlen B, Jähnichen G, Golecki N, Lipp M (2000) Fiberoptische Lageuntersuchung des Combitube nach laryngoskopischer und nicht-laryngoskopischer Insertion. Notfall Rettungsmed 3: 504–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yardy N, Hancox D, Strang T (1999) A comparison of two airway aids for emergency use by unskilled personnel. The Combitube and laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 54: 181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaehnichen G, Golecki N, Lipp MDW (2000) A case report of difficult ventilation with the Combitube—valve-like upper airway obstruction confirmed by fibreoptic visualisation. Resuscitation 44: 71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thierbach A, Piepho T, Maybauer M, Wolcke B (2003) Alternative Methoden des Atemwegsmanagements: Der EasyTube. Rettungsdienst 26: 46–49Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thierbach AR, Piepho T, Maybauer MO (2004) A new device for emergency airway management: the EasyTube. Resuscitation 60: 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Genzwürker H, Finteis T, Kuhnert-Frey B (2002) Der Larynxtubus. Notfall Rettungsmed 3: 371–374Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P (2000) The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth Analg 90: 1220–1222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T (2003) Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 91: 373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidbauer W, Bubser H (2002) Einsatz des Larynxtubus während einer präklinischen Reanimation. Notarzt 18: 266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Genzwürker H, Lojen M, Finteis T, Ellinger K (2001) Atemwegsmanagement mit dem Larynx-Tubus bei isoliertem Schädel-Hirn-Trauma. Notfallmedizin 27: 595–597Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brain AI, McGhee TD, McAteer EJ, Thomas A, Abu-Saad MA, Bushman JA (1985) The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia 40: 356–361Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brain AI (1985) Three cases of difficult intubation overcome by the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 40: 353–355Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pennant JH, Walker MB (1992) Comparison of the endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask in airway management by paramedical personnel. Anesth Analg 74: 531–534Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grayling M, Wilson IH, Thomas B (2002) The use of the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; a national survey. Resuscitation 52: 183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deakin CD (1996) Prehospital management of the traumatized airway. Eur J Emerg Med 3: 233–243Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aoyama K, Yasunaga E, Takenaka I, Kadoya T, Sata T, Shigematsu A (2002) Positive pressure ventilation during fibreoptic intubation: comparison of the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask and endoscopy mask techniques. Br J Anaesth 88: 246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brimacombe JR, Berry A (1995) The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth 7: 297–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stone BJ, Chantler PJ, Baskett PJ (1998) The incidence of regurgitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between the bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway. Resuscitation 38: 3–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Langenstein H, Moller F (1998) Die Intubationslarynxmaske. Anaesthesiol Reanim 23: 41–42Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jaeger K, Ruschulte H, Osthaus A, Scheinichen D, Heine J (2000) Tracheal injury as a sequence of multiple attempts of endotracheal intubation in the course of a preclinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 43: 147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vezina D, Lessard MR, Bussieres J, Topping C, Trepanier CA (1998) Complications associated with the use of the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube. Can J Anaesth 45: 76–80Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richards CF (1998) Piriform sinus perforation during Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube placement. J Emerg Med 16: 37–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barnes TA, MacDonald D, Nolan J et al. (2001) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Airway devices. Ann Emerg Med 37: 145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für AnästhesiologieJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
  2. 2.Klinik für AnästhesiologieJohannes Gutenberg-UniversitätMainz

Personalised recommendations