Advertisement

Clinical results and medical costs of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients over 80 years of age

  • Takashi Yamauchi
  • Suguru Kubota
  • Kosei Hasegawa
  • Hideki Ueda
Original Article Blood Vessel Prosthesis
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is expected to be minimally invasive, especially in older patients. However, clinical results of TEVAR in octogenarians including medical costs are limited. Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 57 patients over 80 years of age (mean age 84.1 ± 3.4 years) underwent TEVAR at our hospital. The proximal landing zone (PLZ) was zone 0 in 7 patients (12.3%), zone 1 in 10 patients (17.5%), zone 2 in 9 patients (15.8%), zone 3 in 13 patients (22.8%), and zone 4 in 18 patients (31.6%). The mean follow-up time was 23 ± 19 months (range 1–71 months). The follow-up rate was 96.5%. The hospital mortality rate was 1.8%. Stroke occurred in three patients (zone 0: 2, zone 3: 1, 5.3%). The mean hospital stay was 21.8 ± 21.4 days (range 5–98 days), and the rate of being discharged home was 84.2%. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 76.1% and 55.1% and the 1-year and 3-year re-intervention-free rates of the thoracic aorta were 97.6% and 94.5%, respectively. The mean total cost by the time of hospital discharge was ¥5,360,000 ± 2,360,000. The clinical results of TEVAR in patients over 80 years of age are acceptable with early postoperative recovery, low mortality and morbidity, and midterm durability.

Keywords

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) Octogenarian Medical costs 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Harrington DK, Walker AS, Kaukuntla H, Bracewell RM, Clutton-Brock TH, Faroqui M, et al. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion attenuates brain metabolic deficit in aortic arch surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2004;110:II231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westaby S, Katsumata T, Vaccari G. Arch and descending aortic aneurysms: Influence of perfusion technique on neurological outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:180–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachet J, Guilmet D, Goudot B, Dreyfus GD, Delentdecker P, Brodaty D, et al. Antegrade cerebral perfusion with cold blood: a 13-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1874–8 (discussion 1891–1874).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strauch JT, Spielvogel D, Lauten A, Galla JD, Lansman SL, McMurtry K, et al. Technical advances in total aortic arch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:581–9 (discussion 589–590).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas M, Li Z, Cook DJ, Greason KL, Sundt TM. Contemporary results of open aortic arch surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:838–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Masuda M, Okumura M, Doki Y, Endo S, Hirata Y, Kobayashi J, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in japan during 2014: annual report by the japanese association for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higgins J, Lee MK, Co C, Janusz MT. Long-term outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minatoya K, Ogino H, Matsuda H, Sasaki H, Tanaka H, Kobayashi J, et al. Is conventional aortic arch surgery justifiable in octogenarians? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:641–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kondoh H, Satoh H, Daimon T, Tauchi Y, Yamamoto J, Abe K, et al. Outcomes of limited proximal aortic replacement for type a aortic dissection in octogenarians. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Wheatley GH, Cambria RP. Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the gore tag device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:912–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stone DH, Brewster DC, Kwolek CJ, Lamuraglia GM, Conrad MF, Chung TK, et al. Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Rango P, Isernia G, Simonte G, Cieri E, Marucchini A, Farchioni L, et al. Impact of age and urgency on survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shirakawa Y, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, Torikai K, Sakamoto T, Shijo T, et al. The efficacy and short-term results of hybrid thoracic endovascular repair into the ascending aorta for aortic arch pathologies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:298–304 (discussion 304).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiraoka A, Chikazawa G, Tamura K, Totsugawa T, Sakaguchi T, Yoshitaka H. Clinical outcomes of different approaches to aortic arch disease. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoshitake A, Hachiya T, Okamoto K, Kitahara H, Kawaguchi S, Nakatsuka S, et al. Postoperative stroke after debranching with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;36:132–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mangialardi N, Ronchey S, Malaj A, Fazzini S, Alberti V, Ardita V, et al. Value and limitations of chimney grafts to treat arch lesions. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015;56:503–11.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drinkwater SL, Goebells A, Haydar A, Bourke P, Brown L, Hamady M, et al. The incidence of spinal cord ischaemia following thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic endovascular intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:729–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ullery BW, Wang GJ, Low D, Cheung AT. Neurological complications of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;15:123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ullery BW, Cheung AT, Fairman RM, Jackson BM, Woo EY, Bavaria J, et al. Risk factors, outcomes, and clinical manifestations of spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:677–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeSart K, Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Hong M, Hess PJ Jr, Beaver TM, et al. Fate of patients with spinal cord ischemia complicating thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:635–42 (e632).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Chang CK, Stone DH, Hess PJ, Martin TD, et al. Efficacy of thoracic endovascular stent repair for chronic type b aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:10–7 (e11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scali ST, Wang SK, Feezor RJ, Huber TS, Martin TD, Klodell CT, et al. Preoperative prediction of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1481–90 (e1481).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurazumi H, Mikamo A, Kudo T, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Shirasawa B, et al. Aortic arch surgery in octogenarians: is it justified? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:672–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson ED, Cowper PA, Jollis JG, Bebchuk JD, DeLong ER, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 24,461 patients aged 80 years or older. Circulation. 1995;92:II85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Avery GJ 2nd, Ley SJ, Hill JD, Hershon JJ, Dick SE. Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian: evaluation of risk, cost, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chung J, Corriere MA, Veeraswamy RK, Kasirajan K, Milner R, Dodson TF, et al. Risk factors for late mortality after endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:549–54 (discussion 555).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Yamauchi
    • 1
  • Suguru Kubota
    • 1
  • Kosei Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Hideki Ueda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryKKR Sapporo Medical CenterSapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryChiba Graduate School of MedicineChiba cityJapan

Personalised recommendations