Advertisement

Shape optimization of a centrifugal blood pump by coupling CFD with metamodel-assisted genetic algorithm

  • Behnam Ghadimi
  • Amir Nejat
  • Seyed Ahmad Nourbakhsh
  • Nasim Naderi
Original Article Artificial Heart (Basic)
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

A centrifugal blood pump is a common type of pump used as a left ventricular assist device in the medical industries. Therefore, the improvement of the device bio-compatibility to reduce the blood damage and to increase the efficiency has become a major challenge. In the current work, a metamodel-assisted genetic algorithm is employed to simultaneously optimize the impeller and volute geometries of a typical centrifugal blood pump. The overall shape of the base design is inspired from HeartMate3 LVAD, and the main dimensions of the base design including inlet and outlet radius, blade angle distribution, volute cross-section area distribution, etc., are designed in our laboratory. Three different scenarios are investigated using three different objective functions, i.e., (1) hydraulic efficiency, (2) pressure head, and (3) hemolysis index (HI). The results showed that the shape optimized by pump efficiency has also nearly the same level of HI as the shape optimized by HI. Hence, to reduce computation time, one can use efficiency instead of HI as an objective function. However, one must check the HI level after such optimization to see whether it is within the acceptable range of HI for such bio application.

Keywords

Hemolysis Centrifugal blood pump Optimization Metamodel Genetic algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is sponsored by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) with the Project No. of 95837323.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10047_2018_1072_MOESM1_ESM.docx (340 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 339 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease stroke statistics—2015 update. Circulation. 2015;131:e29–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fraser KH, Taskin ME, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. The use of computational fluid dynamics in the development of ventricular assist devices. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartoli CR, Kang J, Zhang D, Howard J, Acker M, Atluri P, et al. Left ventricular assist device design reduces von Willebrand factor degradation: a comparative study between the HeartMate II and the EVAHEART left ventricular assist system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraser KH, Zhang T, Taskin ME, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. A quantitative comparison of mechanical blood damage parameters in rotary ventricular assist devices: shear stress, exposure time and hemolysis index. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:81002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hosoda K, Ishii K, Isoyama T, Saito I, Inoue Y, Ariyoshi K, et al. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the pump parameters in the helical flow pump. J Artif Organs. 2014;17:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan TI, Sheh Zad H, Lazoglu I, Yalcin O. Development of a novel shrouded impeller pediatric blood pump. J Artif Organs. 2018;21:142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu L, Zhang X, Yao Z. Shape optimization of the diffuser blade of an axial blood pump by computational fluid dynamics. Artif Organs. 2010;34:185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu H, Janiga G, Thévenin D. Computational fluid dynamics-based design optimization method for archimedes screw blood pumps. Artif Organs. 2016;40:341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nourbakhsh SA, Jaumotte BA, Hirsch C, Parizi HB, editors. Turbopumps and Pumping Systems. Berlin: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourque K, Cotter C, Dague C, Harjes D, Dur O, Duhamel J, et al. Design rationale and preclinical evaluation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system for hemocompatibility. ASAIO J. 2016;62:375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kyo S, editor. Ventricular assist devices in advanced-stage heart failure. Tokyo: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garud SS, Karimi IA, Kraft M. Design of computer experiments: a review. Comput Chem Eng. 2017;106:71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang T, Taskin ME, Fang H-B, Pampori A, Jarvik R, Griffith BP, et al. Study of flow-induced hemolysis using novel Couette-type blood-shearing devices. Artif Organs. 2011;35:1180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faghih MM, Keith Sharp M. Extending the power-law hemolysis model to complex flows. J Biomech Eng. 2016;138:124504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education Inc.; 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koza JR. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press; 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Behnam Ghadimi
    • 1
  • Amir Nejat
    • 1
  • Seyed Ahmad Nourbakhsh
    • 1
  • Nasim Naderi
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research CenterTehranIran

Personalised recommendations