The use of a numerical model to simulate the cavo-pulmonary assistance in Fontan circulation: a preliminary verification
The lack of an established experience on the use of VAD for the cavo-pulmonary assistance leads to the need of dedicated VADs development and animal experiments. A dedicated numerical model could support clinical and experimental strategies design and new VADs testing. The aim of this work is to perform a preliminary verification of a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system to simulate Fontan physiology and the effect of cavo-pulmonary assistance. Literature data of 4 pigs were used to simulate animals’ baseline, and then the model was tested in simulating Fontan circulation and cavo-pulmonary-assisted condition comparing the simulation outcome (Sim) with measured literature data (Me). The results show that the numerical model can well reproduce experimental data in all three conditions (baseline, Fontan and assisted Fontan) [cardiac output (l/min): Me = 2.8 ± 1.7, Sim = 2.8 ± 1.8; ejection fraction (%): Me = 57 ± 17, Sim = 54 ± 17; arterial systemic pressure (mmHg): Me = 41.8 ± 18.6, Sim = 43.8 ± 18.1; pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg): Me = 15.4 ± 8.9, Sim = 17.7 ± 9.9; caval pressure (mmHg): Me = 6.8 ± 4.1, Sim = 7 ± 4.6]. Systolic elastance, arterial systemic and arterial pulmonary resistances increase (10, 69, and 100 %) passing from the biventricular circulation to the Fontan physiology and then decrease (21, 39, and 50 %) once the VAD was implanted. The ventricular external work decreases (71 %) passing from the biventricular circulation to the Fontan physiology and it increases three times after the VAD implantation in parallel with the VAD power consumption. A numerical model could support clinicians in an innovative and challenging field as the use of VAD to assist the Fontan physiology and it could be helpful to personalize the VAD insertion on the base of ventricular systo-diastolic function, circulatory parameters and energetic variables.
KeywordsFontan VAD Lumped parameter model
This work was supported by CONAD. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Rossano JW, Woods RK, Berger S, Gaynor JW, Ghanayem N, Morales DL, Ravishankar C, Mitchell ME, Shah TK, Mahr C, Tweddell JS, Adachi I, Zangwill S, Wearden PD, Icenogle TB, Jaquiss RD, Rychik J. Mechanical support as failure intervention in patients with cavopulmonary a hunts (MFICS): rationale and aims of a new registry of mechanical circulatory support in single ventricle patients. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8(3):182–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sinha P, Deutsch N, Ratnayaka K, Lederman R, He D, Nuszkowski M, Montague E, Mikesell G, Ishibashi N, Zurakowski D, Jonas R. Effect of mechanical assistance of systemic ventricle in single ventricle circulation with cavopulmonary connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1271–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa H. Cardiac contraction and the Pressure-Volume relationships. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.Google Scholar