Journal of Artificial Organs

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 294–300

Evaluation of prosthetic venous valves, fabricated by electrospinning, for percutaneous treatment of chronic venous insufficiency

Original Article

Abstract

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains a major health problem worldwide. Direct venous valve surgical repair and venous segment transplantation are clinical options; however, they are highly invasive procedures. The objectives of this study were to fabricate prosthetic venous valves (PVVs) by electrospinning, for percutaneous treatment of CVI, and evaluate their hydrodynamic characteristics in vitro at the same locations and under the same flow conditions. The PVVs consisted of polyurethane fiber scaffolds attached to a cobalt–chromium stent. PVVs with two different valve-leaflet configurations were compared: biomimetic PVV (bPVV) and open PVV (oPVV). A balloon catheter was used to implant the devices in a poly(vinyl chloride) tube and the column outlet was set at a height of 100 cm above the test valve to simulate the elevation of the heart above a distal vein valve while standing; 50 wt% glycerin solution was used as the test fluid. The devices were evaluated for antegrade flow, effect of ankle flexion, and stagnation zones around the valve leaflets. During sudden hydrostatic backpressure, little leakage and constant peripheral pressure were observed for the devices; under forward pulsatile pressure of 0–4 mmHg, to simulate the effect of breathing, the oPVV had a higher flow rate than the bPVV. With regard to the effect of ankle flexion, the oPVV was functionless. Moreover, the stagnation zone around the oPVV valve leaflets was larger than that around the bPVV valve leaflets. These results suggest that the bPVV would be clinically suitable for percutaneous treatment of CVI.

Keywords

Chronic venous insufficiency Prosthetic venous valve Electrospinning Percutaneous treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    Criado E, Johnson G Jr. Venous disease. Curr Probl Surg. 1991;28:339–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J. 1985;290:1855–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White GH. Chronic venous insufficiency. In: Veith FJ, Hobson II RW, Williams RA, Wilson SE, editors. Vascular surgery: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993. p. 865–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masuda EM, Kistner RL. Long-term results of venous valve reconstruction: a four- to twenty-one-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:391–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosales A, Jørgensen JJ, Slagsvold CE, Stranden E, Risum Ø, Kroese AJ. Venous valve reconstruction in patients with secondary chronic venous insufficiency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:466–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raju S, Fredericks R. Valve reconstruction procedures for nonobstructive venous insufficiency: rationale, techniques, and results in 107 procedures with two- to eight-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:301–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacKenzie RK, Allan PL, Ruckley CV, Bradbury AW. The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on deep venous reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:104–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nwaejike N, Srodon PD, Kyriakides C. 5-years of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for the treatment of varicose veins—a prospective study. Int J Surg. 2009;7:347–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maleti O, Lugli M. Neovalve construction in postthrombotic syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:794–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lugli M, Guerzoni S, Garofalo M, Smedile G, Maleti O. Neovalve construction in deep venous incompetence. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uflacker R. Percutaneously introduced artificial venous valve: experimental use in pigs. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Western Angiographic and Interventional Society, Portland, OR, September 29–October 3, 1993, p. 30.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thorpe PE, Osse FJ, Correa LO. The valve-stent: development of a percutaneous prosthesis for treatment of valvular insufficiency. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the American Venous Forum, Phoenix, AZ, February 3–6, 2000, p. 82.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pavcnik D, Uchida BT, Timmermans HA, Keller FS, Rösch J. Aortic and venous valve for percutaneous placement. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2000;9:287–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomez-Jorge J, Venbrux AC, Magee C. Percutaneous development of a valved bovine jugular vein in the swine venous system: a potential treatment for venous insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:931–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pavcnik D, Uchida BT, Timmermans HA, Corless CL, O’Hara M, Toyota N, Moneta GL, Keller FS, Rösch J. Percutaneous bioprosthetic venous valve: a long-term study in sheep. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:598–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Borst GJ, Teijink JA, Patterson M, Quijano TC, Moll FL. A percutaneous approach to deep venous valve insufficiency with a new self-expanding venous frame valve. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:341–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pavcnik D, Kaufman JA, Uchida BT, Correa LO, Hiraki T, Kyu SC, Keller FS, Rösch J. Second-generation percutaneous bioprosthetic valve: a short-term study in sheep. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1223–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pavcnik D, Kaufman JA, Uchida BT, Case B, Correa LO, Goktay AY, Hamada A, Keller FS, Rösch J. Significance of spatial orientation of percutaneously placed bioprosthetic venous valves in an ovine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1511–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pavcnik D. Update on venous valve replacement: long term clinical results. Vascular. 2006;14:106.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rittgers SE, Oberdier MT, Pottala S. Physiologically-based testing system for the mechanical characterization of prosthetic vein valves. Biomed Eng Online. 2007;6:29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oberdier MT, Rittgers SE. The design, development, and evaluation of a prototypic, prosthetic venous valve. Biomed Eng Online. 2008;7:25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, Vacanti JP. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2077–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kenawyel R, Layman JM, Watkins JR, Bowlin GL, Matthews JA, Simpson DG, Wnek GE. Electrospinning of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) fibers. Biomaterials. 2003;24:907–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuraishi K, Iwata H, Nakano S, Kubota S, Tonami H, Toda M, Toma N, Matsushima S, Hamada K, Ogawa S, Taki W. Development of nanofiber-covered stents using electrospinning: in vitro and acute phase in vivo experiments. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:230–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsubara J. Der Einfluss arterieller Durchblutungsstoerungen auf den Venendruck des Fusses. VASA. 1979;8:221–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pollack AA, Wood EH. Venous pressure in the saphenous vein at the ankle in man during exercise and changes in posture. J Appl Physiol. 1949;1:649–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sumner DS. Applied physiology in venous problems. In: Bergan JJ, Yao JST, editors. Surgery of the veins. Orlando: Grune and Stratton; 1985. p. 3–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringOsaka Institute of TechnologyOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Research and DevelopmentIndustrial Technology Center of Okayama PrefectureOkayamaJapan
  3. 3.Seirei Sakura Citizen HospitalSakuraJapan

Personalised recommendations