Pattern Analysis and Applications

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 147–153 | Cite as

Imprecise information in Bayes classifier

  • Robert BurdukEmail author
Theoretical Advances


The paper considers the problem of classification error in pattern recognition. This model of classification is primarily based on the Bayes rule and secondarily on the notion of intuitionistic or interval-valued fuzzy sets. A probability of misclassifications is derived for a classifier under the assumption that the features are class-conditionally statistically independent, and we have intuitionistic or interval-valued fuzzy information on object features instead of exact information. A probability of the intuitionistic or interval-valued fuzzy event is represented by the real number. Additionally, the received results are compared with the bound on the probability of error based on information energy. Numerical example concludes the work.


Bayes decision rule Imprecise observations Probability of error 



This work is supported by The Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the grant which is being realized in years 2010–2013.


  1. 1.
    Zadeh LA (1968) Probability measures of fuzzy events. J Math Anal Appl 23:421–427zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goguen J (1967) L-fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 18(1):145–174zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pawlak Z (1985) Rough sets and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 17:99–102zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20:87–96zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atanassov K, Georgeiv C (1993) Intuitionistic fuzzy prolog. Fuzzy Set Syst 53:121–128zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control Cybern 31(4):1037–1053zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2003) A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 18(7):837–852zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerstenkorn T, Mańko J (1988) Bifuzzy probability of intuitionistic sets. Note Intuition Fuzzy Set 4:8–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerstenkorn, T, Mańko J (1990) Probability of fuzzy intuitionistic sets. BUSEFAL 45:128–136Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, part I. Inf Sci 8:199–249zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dengfeng L, Chuntian C (2002) New similarity measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognit Lett 23:221–225zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in iteligent data analysis for medical diagnostics. LNCS 2074:263–271Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2004) A similarity measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostics reasoning. LNAI 3070:388–393Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vlachos IK, Sergiadis, GD (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy information—aplication to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 28:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De SK, Biswas R, Roy AR (2001) An application of intitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Set Syst 117:209–213zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitchell HB (2005) Pattern recognition using type-II fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 170:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng J, Liu Y-Q (2008) Type-2 fuzzy markov random fields and their application to handwritten chinese character recognition. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(3):747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhatt RB, Gopal M (2008) FRCT: fuzzy-rough classification trees. Pattern Anal Appl 11(1):73–88MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfang-Chuntain similarity measure and its application to pattern cecognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 24:3101–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stańczyk U (2010) Rough set-based analysis of characteristic features for ANN classiifier. Lecture notes in artifical intelligence, vol 6076. Springer, Berlin, pp 565–572Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okuda T, Tanaka H, Asai K (1978) A formulation of fuzzy decision problems with fuzzy information using probability measures of fuzzy events. Inf Control 38:135–147zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Antos A, Devroye LL, Gyorfi L (1999) Lower bounds for Bayes error estimation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21:643–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Avi-Itzhak H, Diep T (1996) Arbitrarily tight upper and lower bounds on the bayesian probability of error. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18:89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hashlamoun WA, Varshney PK, Samarasooriya VNS (1994) A tight upper bound on the Bayesian probability of error. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16(2):220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kittler, J (1998) Combining classifiers: a theoretical framework. Pattern Anal Appl 1:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woźniak M (2008) Experiments on linear combiners. Advances in soft computing, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, pp 445–452Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kulkarni A (1978) On the mean accuracy of hierarchical classifiers. IEEE Trans Comput 27:771–776zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kurzyński M (1988) On the multistage Bayes classifier. Pattern Recognit 21:355–365zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burduk R (2010) Classification error in Bayes multistage recognition task with fuzzy observations. Pattern Anal Appl 13(1):85–91MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pardo L, Menendez ML (1991) Some bounds on probability of error in fuzzy discrimination problems. Eur J Oper Res 53:362–370zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pardo JA, Taneja IJ (1992) On the probability of error in fuzzy discrimination Problems. Kybernetes 21(6):43–52zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifier: methods and algorithms. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tizhoosh HR (2008) Interval-valued versus intuitionistics fuzzy sets: isomorphism versus semantics. Pattern Recognit 41:1812–1813zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems and Computer NetworksWroclaw University of TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations