Advertisement

Pattern Analysis and Applications

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 159–172 | Cite as

3D pore structure characterisation of paper

  • Maria Axelsson
  • Stina Svensson
THEORETICAL ADVANCES

Abstract

Pore structure characterisation of paper, using automated image analysis methods, has previously been performed in two-dimensional images. Three dimensional (3D) images have become available and thereby new representations and corresponding measurements are needed for 3D pore structure characterisation. In this article, we present a new pore structure representation, the individual pore-based skeleton, and new quantitative measurements for individual pores in 3D, such as surface area, orientation, anisotropy, and size distributions. We also present measurements for network relations, like tortuosity and connectivity. The data used to illustrate the pore structure representations and corresponding measurements are high resolution X-ray microtomography volume images of a layered duplex board imaged at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). Quantification of the pore structure is exemplified and the results show that differences in pore structure between the layers in the cardboard can be characterised using the presented methods.

Keywords

Image analysis 3D Volume images Microstructure Characterisation Pore structure representation Individual pores X-ray microtomography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support and volume image data from the ESRF Long Term project ME-704 are gratefully acknowledged. Prof. Gunilla Borgefors at the Centre for Image Analysis and Dr. Per Nygård at the Paper and Fibre Research Institute (PFI) are acknowledged for their scientific support.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Raoush RI, Willson CS (2005) Extraction of physically realistic pore network properties from three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media systems. J Hydrol 300:44–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aronsson M, Henningsson O, Sävborg Ö (2002) Slice-based digital volume assembly of a small paper sample. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 17(1):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Axelsson M, Chinga G, Svensson S, Nygård P, Malmberg F, Solheim O, Lindblad J, Borgefors G (2006) Detailed quantification of the 3D structure of newsprints in X-ray synchrotron radiation microtomography images. In: Coffin DW (ed) Proceedings of the 2006 progress in paper physics—a seminar. Oxford, Ohio, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Axelsson M, Svensson S, Borgefors G (2006) Reduction of ring artifacts in high resolution X-ray microtomography images. In: Franke K et al. (ed) 28th annual symposium of the German Association for Pattern Recognition, DAGM 2006, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4174, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldwin CA, Sederman AJ, Mantle MD, Alexander P, Gladden LF (1996) Determination and characterization of the structure of a pore space from 3D volume images. J Colloid Interface Sci 181:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertrand G, Malandain G (1994) A new characterization of three-dimensional simple points. Pattern Recognit Lett 15:169–175zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borgefors G (1996) On digital distance transforms in three dimensions. Comput Vis Image Underst 64(3):368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(6):679–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chinga G, Axelsson M, Eriksen Ø, Svensson S (2008) Structural characteristics of pore networks affecting print-through. J Pulp Paper Sci 34(1):13–22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chinga G, Johnsen PO, Diserud O (2004) Controlled serial grinding for high-resolution three-dimensional reconstruction. J Microsc 214(1):13–21CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delerue JF, Perrier E, Yu ZY, Velde B (1999) New algorithms in 3D image analysis and their application to the measurement of a spatialized pore size distribution in soils. Phys Chem Earth Part A Solid Earth Geod 24(7):639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Math 1:269–271zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goel A, Arns CH, Holmstad R, Gregersen ØW, Bauget F, Averdunk H, Sok RM, Sheppard AP, Knackstedt MA (2006) Analysis of the impact of papermaking variables on the structure and transport properties of paper samples by X-ray microtomography. J Pulp Paper Sci 32(3):111–122Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goel A, Tzanakakis M, Huang S, Ramaswamy S, Choi D, Ramaro BV (2001) Characterization of three-dimensional structure of paper using X-ray microtomography. Tappi J 84(5):72–80Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasuike M, Kawasaki T, Murakami K (1992) Evaluation method of 3-D geometric structure of paper sheet. J Pulp Paper Sci 18(3):114–120Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haykin S (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hilpert M, Miller CT (2001) Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Adv Water Resour 24(3–4):243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmstad R (2004) Methods for paper structure characterisation by means of image analysis. PhD thesis, NTNU, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holmstad R, Antoine C, Nygård P, Helle T (2003) Quantification of the three-dimenstional paper structure: Methods and potential. Pulp Paper Can 104(7):47–50Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holmstad R, Goel A, Ramaswamy S, Gregersen ØW (2006) Visualization and characterization of high resolution 3D images of paper samples. Appita J 59(5):370–390Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holmstad R, Gregersen ØW, Aaltosalmi U, Kataja M, Koponen A, Goel A, Ramaswamy S (2005) Comparison of 3D structural characteristics of high and low resolution X-ray microtomograpic images of paper. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 20(3):283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang S, Goel A, Ramaswamy S, Ramarao BV, Choi D (2002) Transverse and in-plane pore structure characterisation of paper. Appita J 55(3):230–234Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindblad J (2005) Surface area estimation of digitized 3D objects using weighted local configurations. Image Vis Comput 23:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindquist WB, Lee S-M, Coker DA, Jones KW, Spanne P (1996) Medial axis analysis of void structure in three-dimensional tomographic images of porous media. J Geophys Res 101(B4):8297–8310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindquist WB, Venkatarangan A (1999) Investigating 3D geometry of porous media from high resolution images. Phys Chem Earth Part A Solid Earth Geod 25(7):593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lindquist WB, Venkatarangan A, Dunsmuir J, Wong T-F (2000) Pore and throat size distribution measured from synchrotron X-ray tomographic images of Fountainebleau sandstones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105(B9):21508–21528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Piper J, Granum E (1987) Computing distance transformations in convex and non-convex domains. Pattern Recognit 20(6):599–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramaswamy S, Huang S, Goel A, Cooper A, Choi D, Bandyopadhyay A, Ramarao BV (2001) The 3D structure of paper and its relationship to moisture transport in liquid and vapor forms. In: The science of papermaking—12th fundamental research symposium, vol 2. Oxford, UK, pp 1289–1311Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rolland du Roscoat S, Bloch J-F, Thibault X (2005) 3D paper structure with X-ray synchrotron radiation microtomography. In: 13th fundamental research symposium, Cambridge, pp 901–920Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samuelsen EJ, Gregersen ØW, Houen P-J, Helle T, Raven C, Snigirev A (2001) Three-dimensional imaging of paper by use of synchrotron X-Ray microtomography. J Pulp Paper Sci 27(2):50–53Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siek JG, Lee L-Q, Lumsdaine A (2001) The boost graph library—user guide and reference manual. C++ In-Depth Series. Addison Wesley ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sintorn I-M, Borgefors G. (2004) Weighted distance transforms for volume images digitized in elongated voxel grids. Pattern Recognit Lett 25(5):525–601. Special Issue on Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery (DGCI’2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sintorn I-M, Svensson S, Axelsson M, Borgefors G (2005) Segmentation of individual pores in 3D paper images. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 20(3):316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith SM, Brady JM (1997) SUSAN - a new approach to low level image processing. Int J Comput Vis 23(1):45–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sternberg SR (1983) Biomedical image processing. IEEE Comput 16(1):22–34Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Svensson S, Aronsson M (2003) Using distance transform based algorithms for extracting measures of the fibre network in volume images of paper. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 33(4):562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thovert J-F, Yousefian F, Spanne P, Jacquin CG, Adler PM (2001) Grain reconstruction of porous media: application to a low-porosity Fontainebleau sandstone. Phys Rev E 63:061307-1–061307-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tomasi C, Manduchi R (1998) Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision ’98, pp 836–846Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vincent L, Soille P (1991) Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(6):583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walbaum HH, Zak H (1976) Internal structure of paper and coatings in SEM cross-sections. TAPPI J 59(3):102–105Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wiltsche M (2005) Three dimensional analysis of paper structure using automated microtomy. PhD thesis, Graz University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhdankin V, Defrenne Y, Ramaswamy S (2006) Method to characterize the 3D structure of porous material using sphere growing and distance transform methods. In: Coffin DW (ed) Proceedings of the 2006 progress in paper physics—a seminar. Oxford, Ohio, pp 116–117£Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Image AnalysisSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations