Advertisement

Pattern Analysis and Applications

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 18–25 | Cite as

An application of image processing in the medieval mosaic conservation

  • Barbara Zitová
  • Jan FlusserEmail author
  • Filip Šroubek
Original Article

Abstract

We present an application of digital image processing techniques in medieval mosaic conservation. The reconstructed art piece was The Last Judgment mosaic, situated on the wall of the St. Vitus cathedral in Prague, in the Czech Republic. The historical photograph of the mosaic from the 19th century was compared with the photograph of the current state in order to detect mutual differences. The images were firstly pre-processed to increase their quality (noise reduction, deblurring). In the second stage, geometrical differences between images were removed by means of image registration techniques—mutual information and feature point correspondence. Finally, differences of the current and historical photographs were identified.

Keywords

Art conservation Change detection Image registration Image restoration Mutual information 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Prague Castle Administration and also partially by grant no. 102/01/P065 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. We are also grateful to Dr. Eliska Fucikova, Dr. Dusan Stulik and Mr. Jan Bonek for introducing us to this interesting project and for many helpful discussions during our work.

References

  1. 1.
    Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 41(3):613–627CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith SM, Brady JM (1997) Susan—a new approach to low level image processing. Int J Comp Vis 23(1):45–78CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mumford D, Shah J (1999) Optimal approximation by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Comm Pure Appl Math 42:577–685zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan TF, Wong CK (1998) Total variation blind deconvolution. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(3):370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vogel CR, Oman ME (1996) Iterative methods for total variation denoising. SIAM J Sci Comp 17(1):227–238zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vogel CR, Oman ME (1998) Fast, robust total variation-based reconstruction of noisy, blurred images. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(6):813–824CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan TF, Golub GH, Mulet P (1999) A nonlinear primal-dual method for total variation-based image restoration. SIAM J Sci Comp 20(6):1964–1977CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geman D, Reynolds G (1992) Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities. IEEE Trans Patt Anal 14(3):367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chambolle A, Lions PL (1997) Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems. Numer Math 76(2):167–188CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown LG (1992) A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput Surveys 24(4):326–376Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zitová B, Flusser J (2003) Image registration methods: a survey. Imag Vis Comput 21(11):977–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Viola P, Wells WM (1997) Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Int J Comp Vis 24(2):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (2003) Medical image registration using mutual information. Proc IEEE 2003 91(10):1699–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goshtasby A (1988) Registration of images with geometric distortions. IEEE Trans Geosci Remot Sens 26(1):60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information Theory and AutomationAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 8Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations