Hydrogeology Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 247–250 | Cite as

The future of satellite remote sensing in hydrogeology

  • Jörn Hoffmann


Remote sensing General hydrogeology Geophysical methods 


  1. Alsdorf DE, Lettenmaier DP (2003) Tracking fresh water from space. Science 301:1491–1494Google Scholar
  2. Amelung F, Galloway DL, Bell JW, Zebker H (1999) Sensing the ups and downs of Las Vegas: InSAR reveals structural control of land subsidence and aquifer-system deformation. Geology 27(6):483–486Google Scholar
  3. Band LE (1986) Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resource Res 22:15–24Google Scholar
  4. Bawden GW, Thatcher W, Stein RS, Hudnut K (2001) Tectonic contraction across Los Angeles after removal of groundwater pumping effects. Nature 412:812–815Google Scholar
  5. Berger M et al (2000) The DAISEX campaigns in support of a future land-surface-processes mission. ESA Bull 105:101–111Google Scholar
  6. Burbey TJ (2001) Storage coefficient revisited: is purely vertical strain a good approximation? Ground Water 39:458–464Google Scholar
  7. Butler DR, Walsh SJ (1998) The application of remote sensing and geographic information systems in the study of geomorphology: an introduction. Geomorphology 21Google Scholar
  8. Dubois PC, van Zyl J, Engman T (1995) Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33(4):915–926Google Scholar
  9. Elachi C, Roth LE, Schaber GG (1984) Spaceborne radar subsurface imaging in hyperarid regions. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens GE-22:383–388Google Scholar
  10. ESA Publications Division, the ENVISAT Project Team (2001) The ENVISAT mission. ESA SP-1255 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  11. ESTEC Publishing Division (1995) The ERS-2: ERS-2 and its Payload. ESA Bull 83Google Scholar
  12. Fung AK, Zongqian L, Chen KS (1992) Backscatter from a randomly rough dielectric surface. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 30:356Google Scholar
  13. Gabriel AK, Goldstein RM, Zebker HA (1989) Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: differential radar interferometry. J Geophys Res 94(B7):9183–9191Google Scholar
  14. Galloway DL, Hudnut KW, Ingebritsen SE, Phillips SP, Peltzer G, Rogez F, Rosen PA (1998) <at>Detection of aquifer-system compaction and land subsidence using interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert, California</at>. Water Resource Res 34:2573–2585Google Scholar
  15. Hajnsek I, Pottier E, Cloude SR (2003) Inversion of surface parameters from polarimetric SAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:727–744Google Scholar
  16. Hoffmann J, Galloway DL, Zebker HA, Amelung F (2001) Seasonal subsidence and rebound in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada, observed by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Water Resource Res 37:1551–1566Google Scholar
  17. Hoffmann J, Leake SA, Galloway DL, Wilson AM (2003a) MODFLOW-2000 ground-water model—user guide to the subsidence and aquifer-system compaction (SUB) package. Open-File Report 03-233, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann J, Galloway DL, Zebker HA (2003b) Inverse modeling of interbed storage parameters using land subsidence observations, Antelope Valley, California. Water Resource Res 39, doi: 10.1029/2001WR001253Google Scholar
  19. Jackson TJ, Le Vine DM, Hsu AY, Oldak A, Starks PJ, Swift CT, Isham JD, Haken M (1999) Soil moisture mapping at regional scales using microwave radiometry: the Southern Great Plains Hydrology Experiment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37:2136–2151Google Scholar
  20. Massonnet D, Feigl KL (1998) Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth’s surface. Rev Geophys 36:441–500Google Scholar
  21. Nolan M, Fatland DR (2003) Penetration depth as a DInSAR observable and proxy for soil moisture. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:532–537Google Scholar
  22. Nolan M, Fatland DR, Hinzman L (2003) DInSAR measurement of soil moisture. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(12):2802–2813Google Scholar
  23. Oh Y, Sarabandi K, Ulaby FT (1992) An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from soil surfaces. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 30:370Google Scholar
  24. Oldak A (2003) Mapping near-surface soil moisture on regional scale using ERS-2 SAR data. Int J Remote Sens 24(22):4579–4598Google Scholar
  25. Prigent C, Matthews E, Aires F, Rossow WB (2001) Remote sensing of global wetland dynamics with multiple satellite data sets. Geophys Res Lett 28:4631–4634, doi: 10.1029/2001GL013263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabus B, Eineder M, Roth A, Bamler R (2003) The shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM)—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 57:241–262Google Scholar
  27. Robinson CA (2002) Application of satellite radar data suggest that the Kharga depression in south-western Egypt is a fracture rock aquifer. Int J Remote Sens 23:4101–4113, doi: 10.1080/01431160110115933Google Scholar
  28. Robinson CA, El-Baz F, Singhroy V (1999) Subsurface imaging by Radarsat: comparison with Landsat TM data and implications to ground water in the Selima area, north-western Sudan. Can J Remote Sens 25:268–277Google Scholar
  29. Rodell M, Famiglietti JS (1999) Detectability of variations in continental water storage from satellite observations of the time dependent gravity field. Water Resource Res 35:2705–2723, doi: 10.1029/1999WR900141Google Scholar
  30. Schultz GA, Engman ET (eds) (2000) Remote sensing in hydrology and water management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith LC (2002) Emerging applications of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) in geomorphology and hydrology. Ann Am Geographers 92(3):385–398Google Scholar
  32. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries JC, Thompson PF, Watkins MM (2004) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the earth system. Science 305:503–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson PF, Bettadpur SV, Tapley BD (2004) Impact of short period, non-tidal, temporal mass variability on GRACE gravity estimates. Geophys Res Lett 31:L06619, doi: 10.1029/2003GL019285Google Scholar
  34. Ulaby FT, Dubois PC, van Zyl J (1996) Radar mapping of surface soil moisture. J Hydrol 184:57–84Google Scholar
  35. Wahr J, Swenson S, Zlotnicki V, Velicogna I (2004) Time-variable gravity from GRACE: first results. Geophys Res Lett 31:L11501, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019779Google Scholar
  36. Watson KM, Bock Y, Sandwell DT (2002) Satellite interferometric observations of displacements associated with seasonal groundwater in the Los Angeles Basin. J Geophys Res 107, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000470Google Scholar
  37. Wdowinski S, Amelung F, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Dixon TH, Carande R (2004) Space-based measurements of sheet-flow characteristics in the Everglades wetland, Florida. Geophys Res Lett 31:L15503, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020383Google Scholar
  38. Wilson AM, Gorelick S (1996) The effects of pulsed pumping on land subsidence in the Santa Clara Valley, California. J Hydrol 174:375–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörn Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.German Aerospace Center, German Remote Sensing Data CenterOberpfaffenhofenGermany

Personalised recommendations