Governance fragmentation and urban spatial expansion: Evidence from Europe and the United States

  • Silvia Beghelli
  • Gianni GuastellaEmail author
  • Stefano Pareglio
Original Paper


This study assesses the effects of urban governance structure on the spatial expansion of metropolitan areas. A more fragmented governance structure, represented by a high number of administrative units with decision power on land use per inhabitant, is expected to increase the competition between small towns in the suburbs of metropolitan areas to attract households and workers, which, in turn, induces more land uptake. We study empirically the relationship between administrative fragmentation and the spatial size of cities in a sample of 180 metropolitan areas in the contexts of the US and Europe in the period 2000—2012. Results shed light on the structural differences between the two broad regions and suggest that administrative fragmentation impacts positively on land uptake in both the United States and Europe, although to different extents.


Land take Governance fragmentation City size United States and Europe 

Governance-Fragmentierung und urbane räumliche Expansion: Erkenntnisse aus Europa und den USA


R12 R28 R52 



  1. Ahrend R, Gamper C, Schumann A (2014) The OECD Metropolitan Governance Survey: a quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations. Working Paper 2014/04. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Albouy D, Ehrlich G (2018) Housing productivity and the social cost of land-use restrictions. J Urban Econ 107:101–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso W et al (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartolini D (2017) Municipal fragmentation and economic performance in OECD TL2 regions. OECD J Econ Stud 2016(1):109–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brueckner JK, Fansler DA (1983) The economics of urban sprawl: theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities. Rev Econ Stat 55:479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brueckner JK, Sridhar KS (2012) Measuring welfare gains from relaxation of land-use restrictions: the case of India’s building-height limits. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(6):1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carruthers JI (2003) Growth at the fringe: the influence of political fragmentation in united states metropolitan areas. Pap Reg Sci 82(4):475–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2002) Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth Change 33(3):312–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberlain G (1982) Multivariate regression models for panel data. J Econom 18(1):5–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng X, Huang J, Rozelle S, Uchida E (2008) Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China. J Urban Econ 63(1):96–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EEA-FOEN (2016) Urban sprawl in Europe: Joint EEA-FOEN report. European Environmental Agency – Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrlich MV, Hilber CA, Schöni O (2018) Institutional settings and urban sprawl: evidence from Europe. J Hous Econ 42:4–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eurostat (2017) City statistics. Luxembourg. Accessed: 30 April 2019Google Scholar
  14. Federal Highway Administration (2017) 2017 National Household Travel Survey. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Accessed: 30 April 2019Google Scholar
  15. Fischel W (2015) Zoning Rules: The economics of land use regulation. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  16. Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2004) Chapter 56 – Sprawl and urban growth. In: Henderson, V., & Thisse, J. F. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of regional and urban economics: cities and geography (Vol. 4). Elsevier: Amsterdam. S 2481–2527.Google Scholar
  17. Gottdiener M, Hutchison R, Ryan MT (2014) The new urban sociology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guastella G, Pareglio S (2017) Spatial analysis of urbanization patterns: the case of land use and population density in the Milan Metropolitan Area. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 29(2):89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guastella G, Oueslati W, Pareglio S (2019) Patterns of Urban spatial expansion in European cities. Sustainability 11(8):2247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hilber C, Robert-Nicoud F (2009) On the origins of land use regulations: the ’influential landowner’ hypothesis. Document de travail. London School of Economics et Université de Genève, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang J, Lu XX, Sellers JM (2007) A global comparative analysis of urban form: applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landsc Urban Plan 82(4):184–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2004) Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34(6):705. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaeger JA, Schwick C (2014) Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecol Indic 38:294–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mcdonald RI, Kareiva P, Forman RT (2008) The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 141(6):1695–1703. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGrath DT (2005) More evidence on the spatial scale of cities. J Urban Econ 58(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mills ES (1967) An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am Econ Rev 57(2):197–210Google Scholar
  27. Mills ES, Epple D, Vigdor JL (2006) Sprawl and jurisdictional fragmentation (with comments). Brookings-whart Pap Urban Aff 231:231–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muth RF (1969) Cities and housing: the spatial pattern of urban residential land use. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (2017) Land-use planning systems in the OECD: country fact sheets. Tech. rep. OECD Publishing, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD (2019) accessed. Accessed: 30. Apr. 2019Google Scholar
  32. Oueslati W, Alvanides S, Garrod G (2015) Determinants of urban sprawl in european cities. Urban Stud 52(9):1594–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulsen K (2012) Yet even more evidence on the spatial size of cities: urban spatial expansion in the US, 1980–2000. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(4):561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paulsen K (2014) Geography, policy or market? New evidence on the measurement and causes of sprawl (and infill) in US metropolitan regions. Urban Stud 51(12):2629–2645. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(40):83–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP (2018) Zoning and the economic geography of cities. J Urban Econ 105:20–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siedentop S, Fina S (2012) Who sprawls most? Exploring the patterns of urban growth across 26 European countries. Environ Plan A 44(11):2765–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Song W, Chen B, Zhang Y (2014) Land-use change and socio-economic driving forces of rural settlement in China from 1996 to 2005. Chin Geogr Sci 24(5):511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spivey C (2008) The mills—Muth model of urban spatial structure: surviving the test of time? Urban Stud 45(2):295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turbé A, De Toni A, Benito P, Lavelle P, Lavelle P, Camacho NR, Van Der Putten WH, Labouze E, Mudgal S (2010) Soil biodiversity: functions, threats and tools for policy makers. Tech. Rep. for European Commission (DG Environment), Bio Intelligence Service, IRD and NIOOGoogle Scholar
  42. UN DESA Population Division (2019) accessed. Accessed: 15. Mai 2019Google Scholar
  43. Wassmer RW (2006) The influence of local Urban containment policies and statewide growth management on the size of United States Urban areas. J Regional Sci 46(1):25–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank (2016) World Development Indicators. Pump price for gasoline. Accessed: 30 April 2019Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fondazione Eni Enrico MatteiMilanItaly
  2. 2.Research Centre on Environment, Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentUniversità CattolicaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations