Advertisement

Gauging two sides of regional economic resilience in Western Germany—Why sensitivity and recovery should not be lumped together

  • Franziska Pudelko
  • Christian Hundt
  • Linus Holtermann
Original Paper
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

The paper empirically investigates the economic resilience of Western German regions in the wake of the Great Recession of 2008/2009. In particular, the focus is laid on the influence of regional agglomeration economies (arising from specialisation, related and unrelated variety) and the explicit subdivision of short-term resilience into sensitivity and recovery. The necessity to distinguish between different factors and phases is well documented by means of the spatial lag and OLS regression results as all three types of agglomeration economies reveal varying, if not opposing directions of influences across the sensitivity and recovery phase. A pregnant example refers to regional specialisation. Not only does it increase sensitivity while exerting a positive influence during the recovery phase, but it is also mediated by the regional share in manufacturing workforce. This workforce reveals opposing phase-specific effects itself. Hence, ignoring the two-component structure of short-term resilience entails the risk of imprecise, if not false conclusions on the driving mechanisms stabilising and/or destabilising regional economies in times of crisis.

Keywords

Regional resilience Economic shocks Sensitivity and recovery Great Recession 2008/2009 Western Germany Specialisation Unrelated variety Related variety 

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial Econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26:77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustine N, Wolman H, Wial H, McMillen M (2013) Regional Economic Capacity, Economic Shocks and Economic Resilience (MacArthur Foundation Network on Building Resilient Regions. Working Paper)Google Scholar
  5. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder J, Schwengler B (2006) Neuer Gebietszuschnitt der Arbeitsmarktregionen im Raum Berlin und Brandenburg. Kritische Überprüfung der bisher gültigen Arbeitsmarktregionen und Vorschläge für einen Neuzuschnitt. IAB (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung), Nuremberg (Forschungsbericht Nr. 4/2006)Google Scholar
  7. Bishop P, Gripaios P (2010) Spatial externalities, relatedness and sector employment growth in Great Britain. Reg Stud 44(4):443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschma R (2014) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Reg Stud 49(5):733–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boschma R, Frenken K (2011) Technological relatedness and regional branching. In: Bathelt H, Feldman MP, Kogler DF (eds) Beyond territory: dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 64–81Google Scholar
  10. Boschma R, Iammarino S (2009) Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Econ Geogr 85:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M (2012) Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Pap Reg Sci 91(2):241–256Google Scholar
  12. Brachert M, Titze M (2012) Wirtschaftsstruktur und Regionalentwicklung: Zur Bedeutung von Headquartern und verbundenen Wirtschaftszweigen. Wirtsch Wandel 18(7):209–216Google Scholar
  13. Brachert M, Kubis A, Titze M (2013) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional functions: a spatial panel approach. http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1301.pdf (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 13.01. Utrecht University)Google Scholar
  14. Brakman S, Garretsen H, Van Marrewijk C (2014) The crisis and regional resilience in europe: on the importance of urbanisation and specialisation. CESIFO working paper, vol 4724. Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich (https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/96904/1/cesifo_wp4724.pdf)Google Scholar
  15. Bristow G, Healy A, Norris L, Wink R, Kafkalas G, Kakderi C, Espenberg K, Varblane U, Sepp V, Sagan I, Masik G, Sensier M, Harding A, Swash A, Carey H (2014) ECR2—economic crisis: resilience of regions. Scientific report. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/ECR2/DFR/Scientific_report.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2016Google Scholar
  16. Cerra V, Panizza U, Saxena SC (2013) International evidence on recovery from recessions. Contemp Econ Policy 31(2):424–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman JS (1991) Handlungen und Handlungssysteme. Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie, vol 1. Scientia Nova, MunichGoogle Scholar
  18. Conley TG, Ligon E (2002) Economic distance, spillovers and cross country comparisons. J Econ Growth (Boston) 7(2):157–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Damm T, Geyer D, Kreuter V, Maget K, Müller R, Rösler W, Sievers F, Sievert S, Slupina M, Storz N, Sütterlin S, Woellert F, Klingholz R (2015) So geht Einheit: Wie weit das einst geteilte Deutschland zusammengewachsen ist. https://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/So_geht_Einheit/BI_SoGehtEinheit_final_online.pdf (Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung)Google Scholar
  20. Duschl M (2016) Firm dynamics and regional resilience: an empirical evolutionary perspective. Ind Corp Change 25(59):867–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckey H‑F, Schwengler B, Türck M (2007) Vergleich von deutschen Arbeitsmarktregionen. IAB Discussion Paper 03/2007. http://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2007/dp0307.pdf (German Federal Employment Agency. Nürnberg)Google Scholar
  22. Elhorst JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spat Econ Anal 5(1):9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elhorst JP (2014) Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springerbriefs in regional science. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eltges M, Zarth M, Hamann C (2009) Mögliche Auswirkungen der internationalen Finanzkrise auf die deutschen Regionen. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/BerichteKompakt/2009/DL_2_2009.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (BBSR-Berichte KOMPAKT 2/2009. Bonn)Google Scholar
  25. Ezcurra R, Rios V (2015) Volatility and regional growth in europe: does space matter? Spat Econ Anal 10(3):344–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farhauer O, Kröll A (2013) Standorttheorien. Regional- und Stadtökonomik in Theorie und Praxis. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  27. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (2016) Industrie in Deutschland. Der starke Kern der deutschen Wirtschaft. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Dossier/moderne-industriepolitik.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2017Google Scholar
  28. Federal Statistical Office (2016) Arbeitsmarkt: Erwerbstätige im Inland nach Wirtschaftssektoren, Deutschland. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Indikatoren/LangeReihen/Arbeitsmarkt/lrerw013.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  29. Fingleton B, Palombi S (2013) Spatial panel data estimation, counterfactual predictions, and local economic resilience among British towns in the Victorian era. Reg Sci Urban Econ 43(4):649–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frenken K, van Oort F, Verburg T, Boschma RA (2004) Variety, employment and regional development in the Netherlands. 44th ERSA Conference, Porto, 25–29 August 2004Google Scholar
  31. Frenken K, van Oort F, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg Stud 41(5):685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Friedman M (1993) The plucking model of business fluctuations revisited. Econ Enq 31:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gehrke B, Schiersch A (2014) Die Wissenswirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich: Strukturen, Produktivität, Außenhandel. https://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Innovationsstudien_2014/StuDIS_6_2014.pdf (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 6‑2014)Google Scholar
  34. Gehrke B, Schiersch A (2016) FuE-intensive Industrien und wissensintensive Dienstleistungen im internationalen Vergleich. https://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Innovationsstudien_2016/StuDIS_06-2016.pdf (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 6‑2016)Google Scholar
  35. Gehrke B, Legler H, Leidmann M, Hippe K (2009) Forschungs- und wissensintensive Wirtschaftszweige. Produktion, Wertschöpfung und Beschäftigung in Deutschland sowie Qualifikationserfordernisse im europäischen Vergleich. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/156517/1/StuDIS_2009-03.pdf (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 3–2009. Hannover)Google Scholar
  36. Gehrke B, Rammer C, Frietsch R, Neuhäusler P, Leidmann M (2010) Listen wissens- und technologieintensiver Güter und Wirtschaftszweige. Zwischenbericht zu den NIW/ISI/ZEW-Listen 2010/2011. https://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Studien/Studien_2010/StuDIS_19-2010.pdf (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 19-2010)Google Scholar
  37. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Schleifer A (1992) Learning in cities. J Urban Econ 46:254–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartog M, Boschma R, Sotarauta M (2012) The impact of related variety on regional employment growth in Finland 1993–2006: high-tech versus medium/low-tech. Ind Innov 19(6):459–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hundt C, Sternberg R (2014) How did the economic crisis influence new firm creation? Jahrb Natl Okon Stat 234(6):722–756Google Scholar
  40. Hundt C, Sternberg R (2016) Explaining new firm creation in Europe from a spatial and time perspective: A multilevel analysis based upon data of individuals, regions and countries. Pap Reg Sci 95(2):223–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Jakubowski P, Lackmann G, Zarth M (2013) Zur Resilienz regionaler Arbeitsmärkte—theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde. Inf Raumentwickl 40(4):351–370Google Scholar
  43. Knoben J, Arikan AT, van Oort F, Raspe O (2016) Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison. Environ Plan A 48(1):132–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2008) Spatial growth regressions: model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spat Econ Anal 3(3):275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Statistics: a series of textbooks and monographs. Chapman and Hall, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lintz G, Schmude K (2005) Germany: tackling the east-west divide. In: Mueller B, Finka M, Lintz G (eds) Rise and decline of industry in central and eastern europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucke D (2011) Die deutsche Industrie—ein Fels in der Brandung? https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.389860.de/11-49-1.pdf (DIW Wochenbericht Nr. 49/2011: 3–12)Google Scholar
  48. Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60(3):531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin R (2012) Regional economic resilience, Hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualisation and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15(1):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin R, Sunley P, Gardiner B, Tyler P (2016) How regions react to recessions: resilience and the role of economic structure. Reg Stud 50(4):561–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milbert A (2014) Laufende Raumbeobachtung—Raumabgrenzungen: Arbeitsmarktregionen. http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/AMR/Arbeitsmarktregionen.html?nn=443270. Accessed 12 Sept 2016Google Scholar
  54. Möller J, Ormerod H (2017) The German job miracle: an interview with IAB Director Joachim Möller. https://www.iab-forum.de/en/interview-with-joachim-moeller-about-the-german-job-miracle/ (IAB-Forum: June 30, 2017)Google Scholar
  55. Otto A, Nedelkoska L, Neffke F (2014) Skill-relatedness und Resilienz: Fallbeispiel Saarland. Raumforsch Raumordn 72:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pendall R, Foster KA, Cowell M (2010) Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pudelko F, Hundt C (2017) Gauging two sides of regional economic resilience in Western Germany—Why resistance and recovery should not be lumped together. Working Papers on Innovation and Space, vol #01.17. Philipps University Marburg, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  58. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2014) Recessions and recoveries—recovery from financial crises: evidence from 100 episodes. Am Econ Rev 104(5):50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson W (1950) Ecological correlations and behaviour of individuals. Am Sociol Rev 15:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt-Seiwert V (2011) Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise—das Europa der unterschiedlichen Betroffenheiten. Inf Raumentwickl 38(2):113–119Google Scholar
  62. Schwengler B, Hecht H (2011) Regionale Arbeitsmärkte in der Wirtschaftskrise. Inf Raumentwickl 38(2):121–133Google Scholar
  63. Schwengler B, Hirschenauer F (2015) Regionen im Ost-West-Vergleich: Vieles ist im Fluss. http://doku.iab.de/forum/2015/Forum1_2015_Schwengler_Hirschenauer.pdf (IAB-Forum 1: 14–21)Google Scholar
  64. Sedita SR, De Noni I, Pilotti L (2015) How do related variety and differentiated knowledge bases influence the resilience of local production systems? http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201504_Sedita_et_al.pdf (Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/4)Google Scholar
  65. Shiskin J (1974) The Changing Business Cycle. New York Times (1st December 1974):222Google Scholar
  66. Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In: Leinhart S (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 290–312Google Scholar
  67. Van Oort F, De Geus S, Dogaru T (2015) Related variety and economic growth in a cross-section of European Urban regions. Eur Plan Stud 23(6):1110–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogel A, Wagner J (2008) Export, Import und Produktivität wissensintensiver KMUs in Deutschland. https://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinrichtungen/ifvwl/WorkingPapers/wp_104_Upload.pdf (University of Lüneburg. Working Paper Series in Economics 104)Google Scholar
  69. Wink R (2011) Evolution regionaler Resilienz: theoretischer Rahmen und Messkonzepte. In: Dreger C, Kosfeld R, Türck M (eds) Empirische Regionalforschung heute. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wink R (2015) Regionale wirtschaftliche Resilienz und die Finanzierung von Innovationen. In: Krüger J, Parthey H, Wink R (eds) Wissenschaft und Innovation: Wissenschaftsforschung. Jahrbuch 2014. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  71. Zarth M (2011) Zur Entwicklung der deutschen Regionen in den langfristigen Konjunkturzyklen. Inf Raumentwickl 38(2):99–112Google Scholar
  72. Zimmermann K, Hundt C, Jütte C, Pofalla C (2017) Dortmund, Duisburg und die Rezession von 2008/09—Warum zwei Standorte derselben Region ökonomisch unterschiedlich resilient sind. Raumforsch Raumordn 75(5):439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography Department, Economic Geography and Location ResearchPhilipps University MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Thünen Institute of Rural StudiesJohann Heinrich von Thünen InstituteBraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.Geography Department, Urban and Regional EconomicsRuhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations