Advertisement

Granular Matter

, 21:15 | Cite as

Measuring the coefficient of restitution for all six degrees of freedom

  • J. E. HighamEmail author
  • P. Shepley
  • M. Shahnam
Brief Communication
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The coefficient of restitution is a cornerstone empirical parameter of any model where energy is dissipated by particle collisions. However, completely determining this parameter experimentally is challenging, as upon collision, a particle’s material properties (such as roughness, sphericity and shape) or minor imperfections, can cause energy to be shifted to other translational or rotational components. When all degrees of freedom are not resolved, these shifts in energy can easily be mistaken for dissipated energy, affecting the derivation of the coefficient of restitution. In the past, these challenges have been highlighted by a large scatter in values of experimental data for the restitution coefficient. In the present study, a novel experimental procedure is presented, determining all six degrees of freedom of a single, spherical, nylon particle, dropped on a glass plate. This study highlights that only by using all six degrees of freedom, can a single reliable and consistent coefficient of restitution be obtained for all cases and between subsequent collisions.

Keywords

Particle characterisation Coefficient of restitution Particle tracking velocimetry Rotational moment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author funding provided by Oakridge Institute for Science and Education. Second author with funding in part through the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK (Grant No. R/147129).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors can confirm there are no conflicts of interest associated to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Ammi, M., Oger, L., Beladjine, D., Valance, A.: Three-dimensional analysis of the collision process of a bead on a granular packing. Phys. Rev. E 79(2), 021305 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonyuk, S., Heinrich, S., Tomas, J., Deen, N.G., van Buijtenen, M.S., Kuipers, J.: Energy absorption during compression and impact of dry elastic–plastic spherical granules. Granul. Matter 12(1), 15–47 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bizon, C., Shattuck, M., Swift, J., Swinney, H.L.: Transport coefficients for granular media from molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. E 60(4), 4340 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brach, R.: Friction, restitution, and energy loss in planar collisions. J. Appl. Mech. 51(1), 164–170 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley, D., Roth, G.: Natural interaction with virtual objects using vision-based six DOF sphere tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, pp. 19–26. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Briggs, L.J.: Methods for measuring the coefficient of restitution and the spin of a ball. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards (1945)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell, C., Brennen, C.: Chute flows of granular material: some computer simulations. J. Appl. Mech. 52(1), 172–178 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cross, R.: Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball. Am. J. Phys. 70(5), 482–489 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross, R.: Impact behavior of a superball. Am. J. Phys. 83(3), 238–248 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crüger, B., Salikov, V., Heinrich, S., Antonyuk, S., Sutkar, V., Deen, N., Kuipers, J.: Coefficient of restitution for particles impacting on wet surfaces: an improved experimental approach. Particuology 25, 1–9 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foerster, S.F., Louge, M.Y., Chang, H., Allia, K.: Measurements of the collision properties of small spheres. Phys. Fluids 6(3), 1108–1115 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garwin, R.L.: Kinematics of an ultraelastic rough ball. Am. J. Phys. 37(1), 88–92 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldsmith, W.: Impact. Arnold, London (1960)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hastie, D.: Experimental measurement of the coefficient of restitution of irregular shaped particles impacting on horizontal surfaces. Chem. Eng. Sci. 101, 828–836 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Higham, J.E., et al.: Using modal decompositions to explain the sudden expansion of the mixing layer in the wake of a groyne in a shallow flow. Adv. Water. Resour. 107, 451–459 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Higham, J., Brevis, W., Keylock, C.: A rapid non-iterative proper orthogonal decomposition based outlier detection and correction for PIV data. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27(12), 125303 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson, K.L., Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo, H., Knight, P., Parker, D., Tsuji, Y., Adams, M., Seville, J.: The influence of DEM simulation parameters on the particle behaviour in a V-mixer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57(17), 3621–3638 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuwabara, G., Kono, K.: Restitution coefficient in a collision between two spheres. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26(8R), 1230 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lp, Li, Sq, Sun, Li, Sc, Zhang, Qq, Hu, C., Shi, Ss: Coefficient of restitution and kinetic energy loss of rockfall impacts. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20(6), 2297–2307 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, T., Guenther, C.: MFIX-DEM simulations of change of volumetric flow in fluidized beds due to chemical reactions. Powder Technol. 220, 70–78 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, T., Zhang, J., Ge, W.: Simple measurement of restitution coefficient of irregular particles. China Particuol. 2(6), 274–275 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maas, H., Gruen, A., Papantoniou, D.: Particle tracking velocimetry in three-dimensional flows. Exp. Fluids 15(2), 133–146 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Müller, P., Pöschel, T.: Collision of viscoelastic spheres: compact expressions for the coefficient of normal restitution. Phys. Rev. E 84(021), 302 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.021302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newton, I.: Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, vol. 1. Benjamin Motte, London (1687)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Owens, N., Harris, C., Stennett, C.: Hawk-eye tennis system. In: International Conference on Visual Information Engineering, 2003. VIE 2003, pp. 182–185. IET (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raman, C.: The photographic study of impact at minimal velocities. Phys. Rev. 12(6), 442 (1918)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seifried, R., Schiehlen, W., Eberhard, P.: Numerical and experimental evaluation of the coefficient of restitution for repeated impacts. Int. J. Impact Eng. 32(1–4), 508–524 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walsh, K.J., Richardson, D.C., Michel, P.: Rotational breakup as the origin of small binary asteroids. Nature 454(7201), 188 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weir, G., Tallon, S.: The coefficient of restitution for normal, low velocity impacts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 3637–3647 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yao, W., Chen, B., Liu, C.: Energetic coefficient of restitution for planar impact in multi-rigid-body systems with friction. Int. J. Impact Eng. 31(3), 255–265 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.National Energy Technology LaboratoriesUS Department of EnergyMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations