Strength of non-spherical particles with anisotropic geometries under triaxial and shearing loading configurations
- 822 Downloads
This paper presents a study on the macroscopic shear strength characteristics of granular assemblies with three- dimensional complex-shaped particles. Different assemblies are considered, with both isotropic and anisotropic particle geometries. The study is conducted using the discrete element method (DEM), with so-called sphero-polyhedral particles, and simulations of mechanical true triaxial tests for a range of Lode angles and confining pressures. The observed mathematical failure envelopes are investigated in the Haigh–Westergaard stress space, as well as on the deviatoric-mean pressure plane. It is verified that the DEM with non-spherical particles produces results that are qualitatively similar to experimental data and previous numerical results obtained with spherical elements. The simulations reproduce quite well the shear strength of assemblies of granular media, such as higher strength during compression than during extension. In contrast, by introducing anisotropy at the particle level, the shear strength parameters are greatly affected, and an isotropic failure criterion is no longer valid. It is observed that the strength of the anisotropic assembly depends on the direction of loading, as observed for real soils. Finally simulations on a virtual shearing test show how the velocity profile within the shear band is also affected by the grain’s shape.
KeywordsComplex shaped grains Failure criteria Discrete element method
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP0985662 The influence of particle shape on 3D Hopper flow.
- 1.Scott, R.: Constitutive relations for soils: Present and future. In: Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-cohesive Soils, pp. 723–726. Balkema (1988)Google Scholar
- 12.Pournin, L., Liebling, T.: A generalization of distinct element method to tridimentional particles with complex shapes. In: Powders and Grains 2005, pp. 1375–1478. Balkema, Leiden (2005)Google Scholar
- 13.Pournin, L.: On the behavior of spherical and non-spherical grain assemblies, its modeling and numerical simulation. Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Pournin, L., Liebling, T.M.: From spheres to spheropolyhedra: generalized distinct element methodology and algorithm analysis. In: Research Trends in Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 347–363. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Schofield, A., Wroth, P.: Critical State Soil Mechanics. McGraw Hill, New York (1968)Google Scholar
- 19.Matsuoka, H., Nakai, T.: Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses. Proc. JSCE 232, 59–70 (1974)Google Scholar
- 20.Lade, P.V., Duncan, J.M.: Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. (ASCE) 99(10), 793–812 (1973)Google Scholar
- 34.Mühlhaus, H., Moresi, L., Hobbs, B., Dufour, F.: Large amplitude folding in finely layered viscoelastic rock structures. Pure Appl. Geophys. 159(10), 2311–2333 (2002)Google Scholar
- 36.Galindo-Torres, S., Muñoz, J., Alonso-Marroquín, F.: Minkowski–Voronoi diagrams as a method to generate random packings of spheropolygons for the simulation of soils. Phys. Rev. E 82(5), 56,713 (2010) Google Scholar
- 38.Tordesillas, A., Peters, J., Gardiner, B.: Shear band evolution andaccumulated microstructural development in Cosserat media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. M. Geomech. 28(10), 981–1010 (2004)Google Scholar