Advertisement

Granular Matter

, 9:69 | Cite as

The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method

  • M. Lu
  • G. R. McDowell
Article

Abstract

The discrete element method has been used to model railway ballast. Particles have been modelled using both spheres and clumps of spheres. A simple procedure has been developed to generate clumps which resemble real ballast particles much more so than spheres. The influence of clump shape on the heterogeneous stresses within an aggregate has been investigated, and it has been found that more angular clumps lead to a greater degree of homogeneity. A box test consisting of one cycle of sleeper load after compaction has been performed on an aggregate of spheres and also on an alternative aggregate of clumps. The interlocking provided by the clumps provides a much more realistic load- deformation response than the spheres and the clumps will be the basis for future work on ballast degradation under cyclic loading.

Keywords

Discrete element modelling Railway ballast Particle geometry 

References

  1. 1.
    Cundall P.A., Strack O.D.L. (1979) A discrete element model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29(1): 47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Itasca, Particle Flow Code in Three Dimensions. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minnesota, 1999Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDowell G.R., Harireche O. (2002) Discrete element modelling of soil particle fracture. Géotechnique 52(2): 131–135Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robertson, D.: Computer simulations of crushable aggregates. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McDowell G.R., Harireche O. (2002) Discrete element modelling of yielding and normal compression of sand. Géotechnique 52(4): 299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng Y.P., Nakata Y., Bolton M.D. (2003) Discrete element simulation of crushable soil. Géotechnique 53(7): 633–641Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harireche O., McDowell G.R. (2003) Discrete element modelling of cyclic loading of crushable aggregates. Granul Matter 5(3): 147–152MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lim W.L., McDowell G.R. (2005) Discrete element modelling of railway ballast. Granular Matter 7(1): 19–29CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Railtrack, Railtrack Line Specification RT/CE/006 Issue 3: Track Ballast. Railtrack, London (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McDowell, G.R., Lim, W.L., Collop, A.C., Armitage, R., Thom, N.H.: Comparison of ballast index tests for railway trackbeds. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Geotechnical Engineering, 157(GE3), p. 151–161 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakata Y., Kato Y., Hyodo M., Hyde A.F.L., Murata H. (2001) One-dimensional compression behaviour of uniformly graded sand related to single particle crushing strength. Soils and Foundations 41(2): 39–51Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lekarp F., Isacsson U., Dawson A.R. (2000) State of the art. I. Resilient response of unbound aggregates. ASCE J. Transport Eng 126(1): 66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suiker A.S.J., Fleck N.A. (2004) Frictional collapse of granular assemblies. J Appl Mech 71, 350–358CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Centre for Geomechanics, School of Civil EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations