Technical details and findings during a second Lichtenstein repair or a second laparoscopic repair in the same groin: a study based on medical records
- 19 Downloads
There are cases where surgeons repair a recurrent inguinal hernia using a second Lichtenstein repair (Lichtenstein–Lichtenstein) or a second laparoscopic repair (Laparoscopy–Laparoscopy) in the same groin even though this contradicts current guideline recommendations. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of surgical modifications and findings during these reoperations.
Patients in this observational study were identified in the nationwide Danish Hernia Database during a 6-year period. Outcomes were identified in medical records. The primary outcome was the prevalence of tailored reoperations and standard reoperations for Lichtenstein–Lichtenstein and Laparoscopy–Laparoscopy, respectively. The secondary outcomes were findings during the reoperation such as inguinal hernia type and size, fibrosis, and difficulty to identify anatomical landmarks.
Of the 102 Lichtenstein reoperations, 43 (42%) were tailored repairs and 59 (58%) were standard repairs. The most common modifications were posterior wall reinforcement with permanent sutures, dividing a structure to enable sufficient hernioplasty, and a modification of the new mesh size and/or shape. There were no differences in the findings during tailored- and standard Lichtenstein reoperations. Of the 58 laparoscopic reoperations, 35 (60%) were tailored repairs and 23 (40%) were standard repairs. The most common modifications were necessitation of a coated mesh due to insufficient peritoneal coverage and use of unusual mesh sizes and/or shapes. Fibrosis was more commonly described during the tailored laparoscopic reoperations.
A substantial part of the Lichtenstein- and the laparoscopic reoperations was tailored approaches, and various modifications were used. Fibrosis was more commonly described during tailored laparoscopic reoperations.
KeywordsTailored repair Modifications Findings Lichtenstein reoperation TAPP reoperation
This study received no financial support from extramural sources.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Öberg reports no potential conflicts of interest. Jessen reports no potential conflicts of interest. Andresen reports no potential conflicts of interest. Rosenberg reports personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Öberg S, Andresen K, Nilsson H, Angenete E, Rosenberg J (2019) Chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repairs compared with laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair: an international questionnaire study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06853-4(In press) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Öberg S, Andresen K, Baker JJ, Angenete E, Rosenberg J (2019) Chronic pain after reoperation of an inguinal hernia with Lichtenstein or laparoscopic repair following a primary Lichtenstein repair: a nationwide questionnaire study. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.015(In press) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M (2014) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg 12:1500–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, Kingsnorth AN, Mandala V, Palot JP, Schumpelick V, Simmermacher RK, Stoppa R, Flament JB (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar