Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?
Ventral hernia repair has become a common procedure, but the way in which it is performed still depends on surgeon’s skill, experience, and habit. The initial open approach is faced with extensive dissection and a high risk of infection and prolonged hospital stay. To tackle these problems, minimally invasive procedures are gaining interest. Several new techniques are emerging, but laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) is still the mainstay for many surgeons. We will discuss why laparoscopic IPOM is still a valuable approach in the treatment of primary non-complicated midline hernias and review the current literature.
We performed a literature search across PubMed and MEDLINE using the following search terms: “Laparoscopic hernia repair”, “Ventral hernia repair” and “Primary ventral hernia”. Articles corresponding to these search terms were individually reviewed by the primary author and selected on relevance.
Laparoscopic IPOM still is a good approach for the efficient treatment of primary non-complicated midline hernias. Several techniques are emerging, but are faced with increased costs, technical difficulties, and low study patient volume. Further research is warranted to show superiority and applicability of these new techniques over laparoscopic IPOM, but until then laparoscopic IPOM should remain the go-to technique.
KeywordsLaparoscopic IPOM Ventral hernia Primary
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest with regard to this paper.
This study did not require approval from the local ethical committee.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Formal consent was not required for this study.
- 2.Coste AHPJ (2019) Umbilical hernia. In: StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459312/. Accessed 19 Aug 2019
- 10.Kroese LF, Gillion JF, Jeekel J et al (2018) Identification of risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary ventral hernia repair: a prospective cohort study of 2,374 patients. Surg (US) 163:1160–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ahmed MA, Tawfic QA, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA (2018) Pain and surgical outcomes reporting after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in relation to mesh fixation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28:1298–1315. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Mercoli H, Tzedakis S, D’Urso A et al (2017) Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 31:1469–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Wiessner R, Vorwerk T, Tolla-Jensen C, Gehring A (2017) Continuous laparoscopic closure of the linea alba with barbed sutures combined with laparoscopic mesh implantation (IPOM plus repair) as a new technique for treatment of abdominal hernias. Front Surg 4:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Brahmbhatt R, Carter SA, Hicks SC et al (2014) Identifying risk factors for surgical site complications after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: evaluation of the ventral hernia working group grading system. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 15:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2012.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar