Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 969–977 | Cite as

Cutting through the fat: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, cost, and quality of life with the addition of panniculectomy to ventral hernia repair in overweight patients

  • C. E. Hutchison
  • I. A. Rhemtulla
  • J. T. Mauch
  • R. B. Broach
  • F. A. Enriquez
  • J. A. Hernandez
  • C. A. MessaIV
  • N. N. Williams
  • S. P. Harbison
  • J. P. FischerEmail author
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Forum on primary midline uncomplicated ventral hernia

Abstract

Background

Due to the increased prevalence of overweight patients with ventral hernia, abdominal wall reconstruction combining ventral hernia repair (VHR) with panniculectomy (VHR-PAN) in overweight patients is increasingly considered. We present a retrospective comparison between VHR-PAN and VHR alone in overweight patients by examining costs, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 25.0 kg/m2 underwent VHR-PAN or VHR alone between September 2015 and May 2017 with a single surgeon and were matched into cohorts by BMI and age (n = 24 in each cohort). QoL was assessed using the Hernia-related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes). Cost was assessed using billing data. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and regression modeling.

Results

Hernia defect size (p = 0.127), operative time (p = 0.140), mesh placement (p = 0.357), and recurrence rates (p = 0.156) did not vary significantly between cohorts at average follow up of one year. 60% of patients completed QoL surveys, with 61% net improvement in VHR-PAN postoperatively (p = 0.042) vs 36% in VHR alone (p = 0.054). Mean total hospitalization costs were higher for VHR alone (p = 0.019). Regression modeling showed no significant independent contribution of procedure performed due to differences in cost, wound complications, or hernia recurrence.

Conclusions

At mean follow up of 2 years, VHR-PAN patients reported a comparable increase in QoL to those who received VHR alone without significantly different cost and complication rates. Concurrent VHR-PAN may therefore be a safe approach for overweight patients presenting with hernia and excess abdominal skin.

Keywords

Panniculectomy Obesity Outcomes Quality of life Ventral hernia Incisional hernia 

Abbreviations

VH

Ventral hernia

QoL

Quality of life

VHR

Ventral hernia repair

VHR-PAN

Ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy

BMI

Body mass index

HerQLes

Hernia-related quality of life survey

SSO

Surgical site occurrence

SSI

Surgical site infection

VHWG

Ventral hernia working group

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jeffrey I. Rohrbach, MSN, of the Division of Data and Analytics at the University of Pennsylvania Health System for his assistance preparing and analyzing relevant cost data and Jesse Y. Hsu, PhD, of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of Pennsylvania for his consultation on statistical methodology and design.

Funding

John P. Fischer is a paid consultant for Gore, Integra LifeSciences, Bard, and Allergan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

John P. Fischer is a paid consultant for Gore, Integra LifeSciences, Bard, and Allergan. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Human and animal rights

No experimental conditions were implemented in this retrospective review. No animals or human participants were directly involved in this study.

Informed consent

As this study was a retrospective review, patient informed consent was not required or obtained for this study. Data were fully anonymized to minimize risk of identification.

References

  1. 1.
    Bower C, Roth JS (2013) Economics of abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am 93(5):1241–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2012) Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 204(2):144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ (1991) Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg 157(1):29–31Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauerland S, Korenkov M, Kleinen T, Arndt M, Paul A (2004) Obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 8(1):42–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0161-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davila DG, Parikh N, Frelich MJ, Goldblatt MI (2016) The increased cost of ventral hernia recurrence: a cost analysis. Hernia 20(6):811–817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1515-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK (2015) Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):478–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2013) Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief 131:1–8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL (2016) Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA 315(21):2284–2291.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berry MF, Paisley S, Low DW, Rosato EF (2007) Repair of large complex recurrent incisional hernias with retromuscular mesh and panniculectomy. Am J Surg 194(2):199–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Butler CE, Reis SM (2010) Mercedes panniculectomy with simultaneous component separation ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):94e–98e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb641d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koolen PG, Ibrahim AM, Kim K, Sinno HH, Lee BT, Schneider BE, Jones DB, Lin SJ (2014) Patient selection optimization following combined abdominal procedures: analysis of 4925 patients undergoing panniculectomy/abdominoplasty with or without concurrent hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):539e–550e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reid RR, Dumanian GA (2005) Panniculectomy and the separation-of-parts hernia repair: a solution for the large infraumbilical hernia in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(4):1006–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fischer JP, Tuggle CT, Wes AM, Kovach SJ (2014) Concurrent panniculectomy with open ventral hernia repair has added risk versus ventral hernia repair: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(5):693–701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warren JA, Epps M, Debrux C, Fowler JL 3rd, Ewing JA, Cobb WST, Carbonell AM (2015) Surgical site occurrences of simultaneous panniculectomy and incisional hernia repair. Am Surg 81(8):764–769Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giordano S, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE (2017) Concomitant panniculectomy affects wound morbidity but not hernia recurrence rates in abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity score analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(6):1263–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harth KC, Blatnik JA, Rosen MJ (2011) Optimum repair for massive ventral hernias in the morbidly obese patient—is panniculectomy helpful? Am J Surg 201(3):396–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.023(discussion 400) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shubinets V, Fox JP, Tecce MG, Mirzabeigi MN, Lanni MA, Kelz RR, Dumon KR, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP (2017) Concurrent panniculectomy in the obese ventral hernia patient: Assessment of short-term complications, hernia recurrence, and healthcare utilization. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(6):759–767.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McNichols CHL, Diaconu S, Liang Y, Ikheloa E, Kumar S, Kumar S, Nam A, Rasko Y (2018) Outcomes of ventral hernia repair with concomitant panniculectomy. Ann Plast Surg 80(4):391–394.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001277 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krpata DM, Schmotzer BJ, Flocke S, Jin J, Blatnik JA, Ermlich B, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function. J Am Coll Surg 215(5):635–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Liang MK (2013) Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):974–982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YM, Rosen MJ (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haskins IN, Horne CM, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Tastaldi L, Perez AJ, Rosenblatt S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2018) A call for standardization of wound events reporting following ventral hernia repair. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Madabhushi V, Plymale MA, Roth JS, Johnson S, Wade A, Davenport DL (2017) Concomitant open ventral hernia repair: what is the financial impact of performing open ventral hernia with other abdominal procedures concomitantly? Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5884-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zemlyak AY, Colavita PD, El Djouzi S, Walters AL, Hammond L, Hammond B, Tsirline VB, Getz S, Heniford BT (2012) Comparative study of wound complications: isolated panniculectomy versus panniculectomy combined with ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 177(2):387–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischer JP, Basta MN, Krishnan NM, Wink JD, Kovach SJ (2016) A cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):647–659.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475775.44891.56 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heartsill L, Richards ML, Arfai N, Lee A, Bingener-Casey J, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR (2005) Open Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair made simple and successful but not for everyone. Hernia 9(2):162–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0319-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muse TO, Zwischenberger BA, Miller MT, Borman DA, Davenport DL, Roth JS (2018) Outcomes after ventral hernia repair using the rives-stoppa, endoscopic, and open component separation techniques. Am Surg 84(3):433–437Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK (2016) Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg 40(1):89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giordano SA, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE (2017) The impact of body mass index on abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(5):1234–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003264 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Hutchison
    • 1
  • I. A. Rhemtulla
    • 2
  • J. T. Mauch
    • 2
  • R. B. Broach
    • 2
  • F. A. Enriquez
    • 2
  • J. A. Hernandez
    • 1
  • C. A. MessaIV
    • 2
  • N. N. Williams
    • 3
  • S. P. Harbison
    • 3
  • J. P. Fischer
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pennsylvania Health SystemPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pennsylvania Health SystemPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations