, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 493–502 | Cite as

Pure tissue repairs: a timely and critical revival

  • R. BendavidEmail author
  • M. Mainprize
  • Vladimir Iakovlev
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Forum on primary monolateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia


“The majority of hernias can be satisfactorily repaired by using the tissues at hand. The use of mesh prosthesis should be restricted to those few hernias in which tension or lack of good fascial structures prevents a secure primary repair. This group includes large direct inguinal hernias and incisional hernias in which the defect is too large to close primarily without undue tension. Most recurrent hernias, because of this factor are best repaired with mesh prosthesis”. These words, penned in 1960 by Francis Usher have reconfirmed what had been a mantra of the Shouldice Hospital (Usher in 81:847–854, 1960). The Shouldice Hospital has specialized in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias since 1945. It has, since its beginning, insisted on the fact that a thorough knowledge of anatomy coupled with large volumes of surgical cases would lead to unparalleled expertise. It was Cicero who taught us that “Practice, not intelligence or dexterity, will win the day”! Since the seminal contribution of Bassini (1844–1924), there have been no less than 80 procedures imitating his inguinal herniorrhaphy and much more since the introduction of mesh and mesh devices (Iason in Hernia. The Blakiston Company, Philadelphia, pp 475–604, 1940). All have failed to some extent and it appears that the common denominator for these failures was the inability to understand the importance of entering the preperitoneal space. Only Shouldice and McVay (Lotheissen, Narath) realized the shortcoming and have continued to thrive as a successful procedure. Entering the preperitoneal space eliminates any temptation to plicate the posterior inguinal wall, a layer normally deficient in direct inguinal hernias, but it also allows the identification of muscle layers rectus, transversus and internal oblique muscles which will go to reconstruct the posterior inguinal wall, without tension as reported by Schumpelick (Junge in 7(1):17–20, 2003).


Pure tissue repair Inguinal hernias Polypropylene mesh CPIP (chronic post-inguinal herniorrhaphy pain) 



We would like to thank Mr. Eric Frysberg for his able contribution in all matters of data handling.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare on the part of the participating authors.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Usher F, Cogan JE, Lowry TI (1960) A new technique for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias. Arch Surg 81:847–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iason AH (1940) Hernia. The Blakiston Company, Philadelphia, pp 475–604Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Junge K, Peiper C, Schachtrupp A, Schumpelick V (2003) Breaking strength and tissue elasticity after Shouldice repair. Hernia 7(1):17–20 (Epub 2003 Jan 15) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendavid R (1986) The, “Fletching”: a new implant for the treatment of inguino-femoral hernias. Int Surg 71(4):248–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bendavid R (1987) A femoral umbrella for femoral hernia repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 65(8):153–156Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bendavid R (1997) Composite mesh (polypropylene-e-PTFE) in the intraperitoneal position. A report of 30 cases. Hernia 1:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bendavid R (1992) Prosthetics in hernia surgery. A confirmation. Postgrad Gen Surg 4(2):166–167Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bendavid R (1993) A rational use of mesh in hernia. A perspective. Int Surg 77(4):229–231Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bendavid R (1994) Prostheses and abdominal wall hernias. RG Landes Company, Austin 9:590Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bendavid R, Iakovlev V et al (2016) A mechanism of post-herniorrhaphy neuralgia. Hernia 20(3):357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iakovlev V, Bendavid R (2018) A pathology of mesh and time. Ann Surg 267:569–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bendavid R, Lou W, Koch A, Iakovlev V et al (2014) Mesh-related SIN syndrome. A surreptitious irreversible neuralgia and its morphologic background in the etiology of post-herniorrhaphy pain. Int J Clin Med 5(13):21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bischoff JM, Linderoth G, Aaswang EK, Werner MU, Kehlet H (2012) Dysejaculation after laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 26(4):979–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skandalakis JE (2004) Surgical anatomy. Paschalidi Publications, AthensGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodrigues AJJR, Rodrigues CH, Terra R, Popler C (1998) Anatomical study of venous architecture at the space of Bogros by preperitoneal approach. In: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paolo, Brazil in American Association of Clinical Anatomists, 15th annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paterson-Brown S, Garden J (1994) Surgical laparoscopy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muller G, Scheyer M, Zimmerman G (1994) Shouldice-Plastik-Erfahrungen. Acta Chir Austriaca 23(Suppl 110):9Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Junge K, Peiper C, Rosch R, Lynen P, Schumpelick V (2002) Effect of tension induced by Shouldice repair on postoperative course and long-term outcome. Eur J Surg 168(6):329–333. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peiper C, Junge K, Füting A, Bassalaý P, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2001) Inguinal tensile strength and pain level after Shouldice repair. Hernia 5(3):129–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schippers E, Peiper C, Schumpelick V (1996) Pro-Shouldice: primary tension-free hernia repair—conditio sine qua non? Swiss Surg 4:33–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murphy BL, Ubl DS, Paley K et al (2018) Trends of inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States. Surgery 163(2):343–350. (Epub 2017 Sep 15) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malik A, Bell CM, Stukel TA, Urbach DR (2016) Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario. Can J Surg 59(1):19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ramjist JK, Dossa F, Stukel TA, Urbach DR, Fu L, Baxter NN (2018) Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study. Hernia. (Epub ahead of print) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fruchaud H (1956) Anatomie chirurgicale des hernies de l’aine chez. DOIN, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H, Danish Hernia Database (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233(1):1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Page B, Paterson C, Young D, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br J Surg 89(6):809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19(1):48–54 (PMID:12514456) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95(1):69–76 (Epub 2004 Nov 5) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P et al (2006) Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg 244(2):212–219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bendavid R (1992) “Dysejaculation”: an unusual complication of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Postgrad Gen Surg 4(2):1992Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nyhus LM (1995) Hernia, 4th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 215Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joseph P (1980) Hernias of the abdominal wall. WB Saunders Co, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Devlin HB (1995) Chronic pain after hernia repair. Expert meeting on hernia surgery. Basel-Karger Publication, St Moritz, pp 365–367Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Iakovlev V, Koch A, Petersen K, Morrison J, Grischkan D, Oprea V, Bendavid R (2018) A pathology of mesh and time. Dysejaculation, sexual pain, and orchialgia resulting from polypropylene mesh erosion into the spermatic cord. Ann Surg 267(3):569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nguyen DK, Amid PK, Chen DC (2016) Groin pain after inguinal hernia repair. Adv Surg 50:203–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G et al (2011) International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 15:239–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Obney N, Chan CK (1984) Repair of multiple time recurrent inguinal hernias with reference to common causes of recurrence. Contemp Surg 25:25Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bassini E (1889) Nuovo Metodo Operativo per la Cura Dell’Hernia Inguinale. R. Stabilimento Prosperini, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ramshaw B, Jacob BP (2013) Sages manual of hernia repair. Sages, RussellGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ryan John J (2001) The McVay operation in abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer, New York, pp 365–369Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryShouldice HospitalThornhillCanada
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations