A novel tool to evaluate bias in literature on use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall hernia repair
- 61 Downloads
Biologic meshes are being increasingly used for abdominal hernia repair in high-risk patients or patients with a previous history of wound infection, due to their infection-resistant properties. Several studies have been carried out to assess whether biologic mesh is superior to synthetic mesh, as well as to establish guidelines for their use. Unfortunately, most of these studies were not rigorously designed and were vulnerable to different types of bias. The systematic reviews that have been published so far on this topic contain the same biases and limitations of the primary articles that are analyzed. The lack of a literature review on the bias on the use of biological mesh prompted us to conduct the literature search, assessment and plan this article.
We performed a literature search in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases of systematic reviews on biologic mesh for ventral hernia repair. The literature review was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes and Design approach. We identified 40 studies that matched the stringent criteria we had set. We then created a 13-point instrument to assess for bias and applied it on the primary studies that we intended to analyze.
Most primary studies are case series or case reports of patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair with biologic mesh, without any comparison group, and the inclusion of cases was only specified to be consecutive in 6 out of 40 cases. In terms of assessing outcomes, in none of the 40 articles were the outcome assessors blinded to the intervention or exposure status of participants.
The instrument that we created could allow to assess the risk of bias in different kind of studies. Our assessment of the studies based on the criteria that we had set up in the instrument clearly identified that further research needs to be done due to the lack of unbiased studies regarding the use of biologic meshes for abdominal hernia repair.
KeywordsBiological mesh Abdominal wall hernia Bias Assessment Literature
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Huerta S, Varshney A, Patel PM, Mayo HG, Livingston EH (2016) Biological mesh implants for abdominal hernia repair: US Food and Drug Administration approval process and systematic review of its efficacy. JAMA Surg 151(4):374–381Google Scholar
- 11.Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716Google Scholar
- 12.AHQR. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF. 2014;(10). https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/CER-Methods-Guide-140109.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2019
- 18.Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Wang EC, Dumanian GA (2009) Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):836–847. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181b0380e Google Scholar
- 21.Rosen M. (2015). A prospective randomized trial of biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh for the repair of complex ventral hernias. Identification No: NCT02451176. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02451176#moreinfo
- 22.Ko JH (2009) Abdominal wall reconstruction. Arch Surg 144(211):1047–1055Google Scholar
- 35.Singh MK, Rocca JP, Rochon C, Facciuto ME, Sheiner PA, Rodriguez-Davalos MI (2008) Open abdomen management with human acellular dermal matrix in liver transplant recipients. Transpl Proc 40(10):3541–3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.105 Google Scholar
- 42.Buinewicz B, Rosen B (2004) Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 52(2):188–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000100895.41198.27 Google Scholar
- 43.Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros A, de la Torre JI, Marrero I, Andrades P, Davis MR, Vasconez LO (2007) Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 58(3):264–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000254410.91132.a8 Google Scholar
- 46.Kolker AR, Brown DJ, Redstone JS, Scarpinato VM, Wallack MK (2005) Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) and component separation. Ann Plast Surg 55(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168248.83197.d4 (discussion 41–42) Google Scholar