Advertisement

Hernia

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Simultaneous robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and inguinal herniorrhaphy (IHR): proof-of-concept analysis from a high-volume center

  • R. R. Bajpai
  • S. Razdan
  • M. A. Sanchez-Gonzalez
  • S. RazdanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Inguinal hernia (IH) is detected in approximately 33% of RALP’s either pre or intraoperatively wherein all are repaired during RALP to circumvent future herniorrhaphy (Fukuta et al., Urology 68(2):267–271, 2006; Nielsen, Urology 66(5):1034–1037, 2005). Some debate this policy by quoting the potential risk of mesh lying close to the vesicourethral anastomosis leading to infections and adhesions. The current study was initiated to elucidate the feasibility and outcomes of simultaneous inguinal herniorrhaphy (IHR) during RALP.

Methods

Historic analysis of prospectively maintained data of 1224 RALP patients, as per inclusion criteria, between 2012 and 2017 was done, among whom 143 patients had a concurrent IHR using 3DmaxTM polypropylene monofilament mesh. Patients were then compared for demographics, peri-operative features, and outcomes.

Results

The mean age and AUA score were significantly different (p < 0.002, p < 0.01 respectively) between patients undergoing only RALP and RALP with IHR. BMI was not significantly different. One hundred forty-three patients (11.6%) underwent IHR at 155 hernial sites, 12 sites being bilateral. One hundred and one sites (65.2%) were diagnosed intraoperatively. The mean console time was 67.4 ± 11.5 min for RALP which increased by 6.9 ± 10.7 min in unilateral and by 10.7 ± 8.6 min in bilateral IHR. There were no mesh-associated or Clavien Dindo class II–V complications. Mean follow-up was 36 ± 1.4 months with no recurrences.

Conclusion

This study reiterates the feasibility and advisability of repairing most inguinal hernias encountered during RALP as it is without any significant alteration of peri-operative morbidity, is associated with excellent post-operative outcomes, and obviates the need for a future surgical procedure.

Keywords

Robotics Inguinal hernia Prostatectomy Herniorrhaphy Robotic surgical procedures 

Notes

Funding

There was no financial grant provided for the conductng of the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Rajesh Raj Bajpai, Shirin Razdan, Marcos A. Sanchez-Gonzalez and Sanjay Razdan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval from the hospital review board was taken prior to initiation of the study.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual patients pre-operatively for use of non-identifiable data for research purposes.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhu S, Zhang H, Xie L, Chen J, Niu Y (2013 Mar) Risk factors and prevention of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 189(3):884–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fukuta F, Hisasue S, Yanase M, Kobayashi K, Miyamoto S, Kato S, Shima M, Tsukamoto T, Takatsuka K (2006) Preoperative computed tomography finding predicts for postoperative inguinal hernia: new perspective for radical prostatectomy-related inguinal hernia. Urology 68(2):267–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamada Y, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Sugihara T, Takemura K, Kakutani S, Suzuki M, Nakagawa T, Kume H, Igawa Y, Homma Y (2017) Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):61.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1126-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen HR, Ting HK, Kao CC, Tsao CW, Meng E, Sun GH, Yu DS, Wu ST (2018) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may induce inguinal hernia within the first 2 years: an 11-year single-surgeon experience of> 400 cases. Medicine 97(37):e12208.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finley DS, Savatta D, Rodriguez E, Kopelan A, Ahlering TE (2008) Transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Robot Surg 1(4):269–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0051-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandenbroucke JP, Vom EE, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ et al (2014) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg 12(12):1500–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Do M, Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P et al (2011) Hernia repair during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: outcome after 93 cases. J Endourol 25:625–629.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen ME, WalshPC (2005) Systematic detection and repair of subclinical inguinal hernias at radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 66(5):1034–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaler K, Vernez SL, Dolich M (2016) Minimally invasive hernia repair in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 30:1036–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW Jr (1966) Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 47:536–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80491-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mourmouris P, Argun OB, Tufek I et al (2016) Nonprosthetic direct inguinal hernia repair during robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 30:218–222.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joshi AR, Spivak J, Rubach E, Goldberg G, DeNoto G (2010) Concurrent robotic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAP) herniorrhaphy during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 6:311–314.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludwig WW, Sopko NA, Azoury SC et al (2016) Inguinal hernia repair during extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 30:208–211.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atmaca AF, Hamidi N, Canda AE, Keske M, Ardicoglu A (2018) Concurrent repair of inguinal hernias with mesh application during trans peritoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is it safe? Urol J 23:4158.  https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4158 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stolzenburg JU, Anderson C, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Truss MC (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 23(4):295–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0001-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu CH, Ou YC (2012) Inguinal hernia after a radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Sci 23:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chung CS, Jeong GY, Kim SH et al (2013) Inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 85:175–179.  https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T et al (2015) Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Surg Innov 22:303.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350614552731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravanbakhsh S, Batech M, Tejirian T (2015) Increasing body mass index is inversely related to groin hernias. Am Surg 10(4):1043–1046Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosemar A, Angeras U, Rosengren A (2008) Body mass index and groin hernia: a 34-year follow-up study in Swedish men. Ann Surg 247(6):1064–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b4399. f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zendejas B, Hernandez-Irizarry R, Ramirez T, Lohse CM, Grossardt BR, Farley DR (2018) Relationship between body mass index and the incidence of inguinal hernia repairs: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Hernia 18(2):283–288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1185-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rabbani F, Yunis LH, Touijer K, Brady MS (2011) Predictors of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy. Urology 77:391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.019.f CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Larkin University HospitalSouth MiamiUSA
  2. 2.Urology, Icahn School of MedicineMount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Division of Clinical and Translational ResearchLarkin Community HospitalSouth MiamiUSA
  4. 4.Director Endourology and Robotic Fellowship Program, International Robotic Prostatectomy InstituteLarkin University HospitalDoralUSA

Personalised recommendations