Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 205–215 | Cite as

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction, harnessing the power of a specialized multidisciplinary team to improve pain and quality of life

  • R. E. Aliotta
  • J. Gatherwright
  • D. Krpata
  • S. Rosenblatt
  • M. Rosen
  • R. GurunluogluEmail author
Original Article
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Patients who require highly complex abdominal wall hernia repair with composite soft tissue free flap coverage represent the most challenging population, and the most difficult to definitively treat. For many, this combined procedure represents their last chance to restore any sense of normalcy to their lives. To date, patient reported post-operative outcomes have been limited in the literature, in particular, quality of life has been an under-reported component of successful management.

Methods

Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed using the 12-question HerQLes survey, a validated hernia-related quality of life survey to assess patient function after complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Using synthetic mesh for structural stability, and microsurgical flaps for soft tissue coverage, ten consecutive heterogeneous patients underwent repair of massive abdominal wall defects. Baseline preoperative HerQLes and numerical pain scores were then compared to those obtained postoperatively (at or greater than 6 months).

Results

All patients experienced improvement in their quality of life and pain scores post operatively with average follow-up at 15.9 months, even in those who experienced complications. All microsurgical flaps survived. There were no hernia recurrences.

Conclusion

Despite the extraordinary preoperative morbidity of massive abdominal wall defects, with an experienced General Surgery and Plastic Surgery multidisciplinary team, these highly complex patients are able to achieve a significant improvement in their pain and quality of life following repair and reconstruction with complex mesh hernia repair and microsurgical free tissue transfer.

Keywords

Abdominal wall reconstruction Components separation Free flap Outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pat Shoda and Susan Lopez for their photography expertise and assistance preparing this manuscript.

Funding

Michael Rosen MD receives research support from Intuitive and Miromatrix, and salary support from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). David Krpata MD is a consultant for Medtronic. All other listed authors have no financial disclosures. No funding was received for this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

REA declares no conflict of interest. JG declares no conflict of interest. DK declares no conflict of interest. SR declares no conflict of interest. MR declares no conflict of interest. RG declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The article does not contain any identifiable information and the content is compliant with HIPPA regulations and human rights.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Gurunluoglu R et al (2016) Arteriovenous loop graft in abdominal wall reconstruction using free tissue transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(11):1513–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gurunluoglu R, Rosen MJ (2017) Recipient vessels for microsurgical flaps to the abdomen: a systematic review. Microsurgery 37:707–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hallock GG (2012) Delayed abdominal wall reconstruction of giant ventral hernias using the anterolateral thigh free flap for skin coverage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(4):1028–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kayano S et al (2012) Comparison of pedicled and free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of complex defects of the abdominal wall: review of 20 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(11):1525–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong CH et al (2009) Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects with free flaps: indications and clinical outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim SW et al (2013) Reconstruction of infected abdominal wall defects using latissimus dorsi free flap. ANZ J Surg 83(12):948–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tukiainen E, Leppaniemi A (2011) Reconstruction of extensive abdominal wall defects with microvascular tensor fasciae latae flap. Br J Surg 98(6):880–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hahn E Jr, Lee ES, Keith JD (2016) A neurotized anterolateral thigh flap with a unique anastomosis to the gastroepiploic artery: a case report of a reconstruction of composite abdominal wall defect. Eplasty 16:ic29Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steffensen SM et al (2014) Latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction of major abdominal defect in treatment of giant Marjolin’s ulcer: a short report focused on preoperative imaging. Acta Radiol Short Rep 3(1):2047981613516614Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadoch V et al (2010) Latissimus dorsi free flap for reconstruction of extensive full-thickness abdominal wall defect. A case of desmoid tumor. J Visc Surg 147(2):e45–e48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iida T et al (2013) Dynamic reconstruction of full-thickness abdominal wall defects using free innervated vastus lateralis muscle flap combined with free anterolateral thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg 70(3):331–334Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lv Y et al (2015) Abdominal wall reconstruction using a combination of free tensor fasciae lata and anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap: a prospective study in 16 patients. Am J Surg 210(2):365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sinna R et al (2010) Reconstruction of a full-thickness abdominal wall defect using an anterolateral thigh free flap. J Visc Surg 147(2):e49–e53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bulic K et al (2008) Prosthetic mesh for infected abdominal wall defects? Report of a patient with a large full thickness abdominal wall defect and colostomy due to a gunshot wound. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(4):455–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Servant JM, Arnault E, Revol M, Danino A (2006) Reconstruction of large thoracoabdominal defects using two-stage free tissue transfers and prosthetic materials. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 59:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chevray PM, Singh NK (2003) Abdominal wall reconstruction with the free tensor fascia lata musculofasciocutaneous flap using intraperitoneal gastroepiploic recipient vessels. Ann Plast Surg 51(1):97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grinsell D, Di Bella C, Choong PF (2012) Functional reconstruction of sarcoma defects utilising innervated free flaps. Sarcoma 2012:315190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin SJ, Butler CE (2010) Subtotal thigh flap and bioprosthetic mesh reconstruction for large, composite abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(4):1146–1156Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dorai AA, Halim AS (2007) Extended double pedicle free tensor fascia latae myocutaneous flap for abdominal wall reconstruction. Singap Med J 48(5):e141–e145Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bodin F, Dissaux B, Romain B, Rohr S, Brigand C (2015) Complex abdominal wall defect reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi free flap with mesh after malignant tumor resection. Microsurgery 37:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koshima I et al (1999) Dynamic reconstruction of the abdominal wall using a reinnervated free rectus femoris muscle transfer. Ann Plast Surg 43(2):199–203Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuo YR et al (2004) One-stage reconstruction of large midline abdominal wall defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. Ann Surg 239(3):352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vranckx JJ et al (2015) Dynamic reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects with the pedicled innervated vastus lateralis and anterolateral thigh PIVA flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(6):837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krpata DM et al (2012) Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function. J Am Coll Surg 215(5):635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanters AE et al (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blatnik JA, DM Krpata, Novitsky YW (2016) Transversus abdominis release as an alternative component separation technique for ventral hernia repair. JAMA Surg 151(4):383–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zarzaur BL et al (2011) Quality of life after abdominal wall reconstruction following open abdomen. J Trauma 70(2):285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jensen KK (2017) Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction. Dan Med J 64:3Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sosin M et al (2014) A patient-centered appraisal of outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alleyne B et al (2017) Combined submuscular tissue expansion and anterior component separation technique for abdominal wall reconstruction: long-term outcome analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:752–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dermatology and Plastic Surgery InstituteCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Hernia CenterDigestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Division of Plastic SurgeryMetroHealth Medical CenterClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations