Advertisement

Hernia

pp 1–7 | Cite as

How I do it: the horizontal-bilateral unfolding method for self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh placement in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

  • J. LiEmail author
  • X. Shao
  • T. Cheng
How-I-Do-It
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The use of the self-gripping mesh (Progrip™) during laparoscopic inguinal hernia has been proved to be effective and eliminates the need of additional fixation. However, the deployment of the self-gripping mesh is challenging due to its adhesive property. The purpose of this study was to introduce and describe an easy self-gripping mesh deployment method in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The self-gripping mesh was folded bilaterally towards the center of the mesh and placed vertically to align with the inferior epigastric artery, centered on the internal defect, then unfolded in a horizontal-bilateral unfolding method, first laterally, then medially.

Results

A total of 63 inguinal hernias were repaired laparoscopicly: 40 patients by TAPP or TEP technique with self-gripping mesh, and there were no perioperative complications. The average time of mesh placement was 186 s (45–250 s). The patients only feel minimal pain (less than VAS 3) the second postoperative morning, and most of the patients were discharged the next day postoperatively; the average postoperative hospital duration was 1 day (1–2 days).

Conclusion

The present “horizontal-bilateral unfolding” mesh deployment method is a relative easy method to implant the self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Keywords

TAPP TEP Laparoscopic Hernia repair Progrip Self-gripping mesh Inguinal hernia 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to be declared by the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any study with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson K, Sains P, Baig MK (2012) A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker. Int J Surg 10:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia International Endohernia Society(IEHS). Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T, Wolf L, Guo D (2018) Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 12(4):625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR (2006) Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitonealinguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 10(4):457–460Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong J, Anvari M (2001) Treatment of inguinodynia after laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a combined laparoscopic and fluoroscopic approach to the removal of helical tackers. Surg Laparosc Endosc Per Tech 11:148–151Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WCS, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agresta F, Podda M, Silecchia G (2008) Improved immediate postoperative pain following laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using self-adhering mesh: the importance of clinical practice guidelines. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1787-z. [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aggarwal S, Praneeth K, Rathore Y, Waran V, Singh P (2016) Laparoscopic management of mesh erosion into small bowel and urinary bladder following total extra-peritoneal repair of inguinal hernia. J Minim Access Surg 12(1):79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandhu AS, Kumar A, Kumar BN (2017) Mesh erosion into urinary bladder following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg 3(2):139–142Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katkhouda N (2004) A new technique for laparoscopic hernia repair using fibrin sealant. Surg Technol Int 12:120–127Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katkhouda N et al (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13(2):137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kingsnorth A et al (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping ParietexTM ProGripTM polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16(3):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, Reiner M, Jacob B (2015) The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study. Surg Endosc 29(9):2690–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozmen J, Choi V, Hepburn K, Hawkins W, Loi K (2015) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair using a self-gripping mesh: clinical results of 235 primary and recurrent groin hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(11):915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Birk D, Hess S, Garcia-Pardo C (2013) Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months. Hernia 17(3):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F (2016) A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery 160(5):1344–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daes J, Felix E (2017) Critical view of the myopectineal orifice. Ann Surg 266(1):e1–e2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kosai N, Sutton PA, Evans J, Varghese J (2011) Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair using a novel self-adhesive mesh. J Minim Access Surg 7(3):192–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kingsnorth A, Nienhuijs S, Schu¨le S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Smeds S (2010) Preliminary results of a comparative randomized study: benefit of self-gripping Parietex. ProgripTM meshHernia 14:0–001Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tam KW, Liang HH, Chai CY (2010) Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 34(12):3065–3074.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0760-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, Yang KH, Zhang YC, Tian JH, Han JX (2011) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25(9):2849–2858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fumagalli RU, Puccetti F, Elmore U, Massaron S, Rosati R (2013) Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 5:1798–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barbaro A, Kanhere H, Bessell J, Maddern GJ (2017) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair versus open inguinal hernia repair: 20-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Hernia 21(5):723–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Ashrafi D, Memon B, Memon MA (2018) Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1817-x. [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amid PK (2004) Radiologic images of meshoma: a new phenomenon causing chronic pain after prosthetic repair of abdominal wall hernias. Arch Surg 139:1297–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwab R, Schumacher O, Junge K, Binnebösel M, Klinge U, Becker HP, Schumpelick V (2008) Biomechanical analyses of mesh fixation in TAPP and TEP hernia repair. Surg Endosc 22:731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, Crafton WB (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225(4):422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda HospitalSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations