Advertisement

Hernia

pp 1–6 | Cite as

Inguinal hernias appearing after lateral lymph node dissection via extraperitoneal approach for advanced lower rectal cancer

  • T. TaniokaEmail author
  • H. Masuko
  • H. Yamagami
  • S. Takahashi
  • H. Ishizu
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is performed for advanced lower rectal cancer (ALRC) in Japan. The LLND in laparotomy is performed via the extraperitoneal approach, which is similar to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Inguinal hernias (IHs) appearing after RRP are common. However, there are few reports about IHs appearing after LLND.

Methods

In part A, we retrospectively investigated 108 patients who underwent LLND for ALRC between January 2004 and December 2014. In part B, we compared 13 patients who underwent IH repair after LLND and 57 patients who underwent IH repair after RRP in the same period.

Results

In part A, the incidence of IHs after LLND was 7% (8/108). All eight patients who developed IHs were male, and their median age was 60 years. More than 80% of IHs observed were the unilateral lateral type. In part B, the interval between the previous operation and IH occurrence was 4.9 years on average. Furthermore, 2 out of the 13 patients developed additional IHs occurring on the opposite side within 2 years.

Conclusions

The characteristics associated with developing IHs after LLND were similar to those after RRP. Any pelvic operation via the extraperitoneal approach has a risk of IHs, and surgeons should pay attention to IHs after surgery.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia Lateral lymph node dissection Rectal cancer Radical retropubic prostatectomy 

Notes

Funding

The authors have received no grant support or other forms of assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW Jr (1996) Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 47(4):536–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80491-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abe T, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Sazawa A, Suzuki S, Kawarada Y, Nonomura K (2007) Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 69(2):326–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Twu CM, Ou YC, Yang CR, Cheng CL, Ho HC (2005) Predicting risk factors for inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 66(4):814–818.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ichioka K, Yoshimura K, Utsunomiya N, Ueda N, Matsui Y, Terai A, Arai Y (2004) High incidence of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 63(2):278–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoshimine S, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, Ide H, Kikuchi E, Oya M (2010) Extraperitoneal approach induces postoperative inguinal hernia compared with transperitoneal approach after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(4):349–352.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyp172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu S, Zhang H, Xie L, Chen J, Niu Y (2013) Risk factors and prevention of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 189(3):884–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Mori T, Mochizuki H, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1663–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0714-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, Hashiguchi Y, Ito Y, Saito Y, Hamaguchi T, Ishida H, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, Kanemitsu Y, Kawano H, Kinugasa Y, Kokudo N, Murofushi K, Nakajima T, Oka S, Sakai Y, Tsuji A, Uehara K, Ueno H, Yamazaki K, Yoshida M, Yoshino T, Boku N, Fujimori T, Itabashi M, Koinuma N, Morita T, Nishimura G, Sakata Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi K, Tanaka S, Tsuruta O, Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi N, Tanaka T, Kotake K, Sugihara K (2018) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23(1):1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1997) Importance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. World J Surg 21(7):728–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lodding P, Bergdahl C, Nyberg M, Pileblad E, Stranne J, Hugosson J (2001) Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a study of incidence and risk factors in comparison to no operation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 166(3):964–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stranne J, Hugosson J, Lodding P (2007) Inguinal hernia is a common complication in lower midline incision surgery. Hernia 11(3):247–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0215-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamada Y, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Sugihara T, Takemura K, Kakutani S, Suzuki M, Nakagawa T, Kume H, Igawa Y, Homma Y (2017) Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):61.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1126-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koie T, Yoneyama T, Kamimura N, Imai A, Okamoto A, Ohyama C (2008) Frequency of postoperative inguinal hernia after endoscope-assisted mini-laparotomy and conventional retropubic radical prostatectomies. Int J Urol 15(3):226–229.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01983.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakon M, Sekino Y, Okada M, Seki H, Munakata Y (2017) Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Hernia 21(5):745–748.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1639-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohuchi M, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Azuma D, Kohama S, Nomoto J, Sakamoto K (2018) Surgical technique and outcomes of transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair after radical prostatectomy: dissection between the transversalis fascia and superficial layers of preperitoneal fascia. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1800-6 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujii Y, Yamamoto S, Yonese J, Kawakami S, Okubo Y, Suyama T, Komai Y, Kijima T, Fukui I (2010) A novel technique to prevent postradical retropubic prostatectomy inguinal hernia: the processus vaginalis transection method. Urology 75(3):713–717.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kark AE, Kurzer M (2008) Groin hernias in women. Hernia 12(3):267–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0330-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nilsson H, Holmberg H, Nordin P (2017) Groin hernia repair in women—a nationwide register study. Am J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.027 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sakai Y, Okuno T, Kijima T, Iwai A, Matsuoka Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K (2009) Simple prophylactic procedure of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: isolation of the spermatic cord. Int J Urol 16(10):848–851.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02370.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taguchi K, Yasui T, Kubota H, Fukuta K, Kobayashi D, Naruyama H, Okada A, Yamada Y, Tozawa K, Kohri K (2010) Simple method of preventing postoperative inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 76(5):1083–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fujii Y, Yamamoto S, Yonese J, Masuda H, Urakami S, Kitsukawa S, Sakura M, Yuasa T, Kihara K, Fukui I (2014) The processus vaginalis transection method to prevent postradical prostatectomy inguinal hernia: long-term results. Urology 83(1):247–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsunaga R, Negishi M, Higashi H, Shida H, Akakura K (2015) Prophylactic procedure for inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Hernia 19(5):785–788.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1323-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Tanioka
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • H. Masuko
    • 3
  • H. Yamagami
    • 2
  • S. Takahashi
    • 2
  • H. Ishizu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment, Graduate School of MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryJA Sapporo Kosei HospitalSapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryNikko Memorial HospitalHokkaidoJapan

Personalised recommendations