, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1033–1039 | Cite as

iBTA-induced bovine Biosheet for repair of abdominal wall defects in a beagle model: proof of concept

  • Y. NakayamaEmail author
  • N. Oshima
  • E. Tatsumi
  • O. Ichii
  • T. Nishimura
Original Article



We evaluated the usefulness of xeno-Biosheets, an in-body tissue architecture-induced bovine collagenous sheet, as repair materials for abdominal wall defects in a beagle model.

Materials and Methods

Biosheets were prepared by embedding cylindrical molds into subcutaneous pouches of three Holstein cows for 2–3 months and stored in 70% ethanol. The Biosheets were 0.5 mm thick, cut into 2 cm × 2 cm, and implanted to replace defects of the same size in the abdominal wall of nine beagles. The abdominal wall and Biosheets were harvested and subjected to histological evaluation at 1, 3, and 5 months after implantation (n = 3 each).


The Biosheet and bovine pericardiac patch (control) were not stressed during the suture operation and did not split, and patches were easily implanted on defective wounds. After implantation, the patch did not fall off and was not perforated, and healing was observed nacroscopically in all cases. During the first month of implantation, accumulation of inflammatory cells was observed along with decomposition around the Biosheet. Decomposition was almost complete after 3 months, and the Biosheet was replaced by autologous collagenous connective tissue without rejection. After 5 months, the abdominal wall muscle elongated from the periphery of the newly formed collagen layer and the peritoneum was formed on the peritoneal cavity surface. Regeneration of almost all layers of the abdominal wall was observed. However, almost all pericardium patches were remained even at 5 months with inflammation.


Bovine Biosheets requiring no special post-treatment can be useful as off-the-shelf materials for abdominal wall repair.


Abdominal wall In-body tissue architecture Biosheet Xeno Repair material 



We would like to thank Manami Sone, Tomohiro Mitani, Teppei Ikeda, and Keigo Kosenda for their valuable help.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest associated with this work.

Ethical approval

The animal experiments were approved by the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute Committee (No. 17013) and Hokkaido University (No. 16-0110).

Human and animal rights

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, published by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No.85-23, received 1996).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Wang ZL, Wu SZ, Li ZF, Guo JH, Zhang Y, Pi JK, Hu JG, Yang XJ, Huang FG, Xie HQ (2018) Comparison of small intestinal submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall defect repair. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 29:663–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akcakaya A, Aydogdu I, Citgez B (2018) Investigation into the optimal prosthetic material for wound healing of abdominal wall defects. Exp Ther Med 15:1622–1625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lukasiewicz A, Drewa T (2014) Synthetic implants in hernia surgery. Adv Clin Exp Med 23:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garvey PB, Giordano SA, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE (2017) Long-term outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. J Am Coll Surg 224:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takahashi M, Ono K, Wakakuwa R, Sato O, Tsuchiya Y, Kamiya G, Nitta K, Tajima K, Wada K (1994) The use of a human dura mater allograft for the repair of a contaminated abdominal wall defect: report of a case. Surg Today 24:468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lai PH, Chang Y, Liang HC, Chen SC, Wei HJ, Sung HW (2005) Peritoneal regeneration induced by an acellular bovine pericardial patch in the repair of abdominal wall defects. J Surg Res 127:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurrado A, Franco IF, Lissidini G, Greco G, De Fazio M, Pasculli A, Girardi A, Piccinni G, Memeo V, Testini M (2015) Impact of pericardium bovine patch (Tutomesh(®)) on incisional hernia treatment in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields: retrospective comparative study. Hernia 19:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakayama Y, Furukoshi M (2018) Feasibility of in-body tissue architecture in pediatric cardiovascular surgery: development of regenerative autologous tissues with growth potential. J Pediatr Cardiol Cardiac Surg 2:28–36Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii D, Enmi JI, Iwai R, Kurisu K, Tatsumi E, Nakayama Y (2018) One year rat study of iBTA-induced “microbiotube” microvascular grafts with an ultra-small diameter of 0.6 mm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 55:882–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takiyama N, Mizuno T, Iwai R, Uechi M, Nakayama Y (2016) In-body tissue-engineered collagenous connective tissue membranes (BIOSHEETs) for potential corneal stromal substitution. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 10:E518–E526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suzuki K, Komura M, Terawaki K, Kodaka T, Gohara T, Komura H, Nakayama Y (2018) Engineering and repair of diaphragm using biosheet (a collagenous connective tissue membrane) in rabbits. J Pediatr Surg 53:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okuyama H, Umeda S, Takama Y, Terasawa T, Nakayama Y (2018) Patch esophagoplasty using an in-body-tissue-engineered collagenous connective tissue membrane. J Pediatr Surg 53:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takewa Y, Sumikura H, Kishimoto S, Naito N, Iizuka K, Akiyama D, Iwai R, Tatsumi E, Nakayama Y (2018) Implanted in-body tissue-engineered heart valve can adapt the histological structure to the environment. ASAIO J 64:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terazawa T, Nishimura T, Mitani T, Ichii O, Ikeda T, Kosenda K, Tatsumi E, Nakayama Y (2018) Wall thickness control in biotubes prepared using type-C mold. J Artif Organs. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terazawa T, Kawashima T, Umeno T, Wada T, Tatsumi E, Ozaki S, Miyamoto S, Nakayama Y (2018) Material and mechanical properties of iBTA-induced autologous Biosheet for application as aortic valve reconstruction material. J Artif Organs (submitted) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, Uchida S, Takatoh M, Kiyohara N (2018) Midterm outcomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155:2379–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okamoto K, Kawashima T, Nakayama Y, Anai H, Wada T, Takebayashi S, Shuto T, Kozaki S, Miyamoto S (2016) Aortic valve reconstruction using in-body tissue-engineered collagenous connective tissue membranes, BIOSHEETs, in a 3-month goat model. Circulation 134:A13472Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lopesa MS, Jardinib AL, Filho RM (2012) Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue engineering applications. Procedia Eng 42:1402–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uretzky G, Appelbaum Y, Younes H, Udassin R, Nataf P, Baccioglu E, Pizof G, Borman JB, Cohn D (1990) Long-term evaluation of a new selectively biodegradable vascular graft coated with polyethylene oxide-polylactic acid for right ventricular conduit. An experimental study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 100:769–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, Stein J, Detschades C, Siniawski H, Hetzer R (2008) Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fisher O, Meecham L, Buxton P, Legge J, Fairhead J, Rajagopalan S, Asquith J, Pherwani A (2018) Long-term outcomes of bovine pericardial patch angioplasty for recurrent stenosis in vascular access: a UK single-centre experience. J Vasc Access. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jorge-Herrero E, Garcia Paez JM, Del Castillo-Olivares Ramos JL (2005) Tissue heart valve mineralization: review of calcification mechanisms and strategies for prevention. J Appl Biomater Biomech 3:67–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S, Pruss A, Konertz W (2011) Ten years of clinical results with a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1308–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Nakayama
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • N. Oshima
    • 1
    • 3
  • E. Tatsumi
    • 1
  • O. Ichii
    • 4
  • T. Nishimura
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Artificial OrgansNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research InstituteSuitaJapan
  2. 2.Biotube Co., Ltd.NishiyodogawaJapan
  3. 3.Veterinary Internal Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource SciencesNihon UniversityFujisawaJapan
  4. 4.Laboratory of Anatomy, Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  5. 5.Research Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations