Patient’s satisfaction at 2 years after groin hernia repair: any difference according to the technique?
Long-term patient’s satisfaction after groin hernia repair is rarely studied in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the four main techniques of inguinal hernia repair in terms of patient‘s satisfaction and quality of life at the 2-year follow-up in a prospective registry.
From September 2011 to March 2014, consecutive patients underwent groin hernia repair and were prospectively included in the Club Hernie registry, which also consisted of expert surgeons in parietal repair. The data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, initial workup, operative technique, postoperative course, clinical follow-up, and quality of life at 2 years (2Y-FU) were recorded.
Overall, 5670 patients were included in the study: 1092 undergoing Lichtenstein’s technique, 1259 for trans-inguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP), 1414 for totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) and 1905 for transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP). The patients undergoing Lichtenstein’s technique were significantly older, with more inguinoscrotal hernias and co-morbidities than those undergoing other techniques. A total of 83% patients had a complete 2Y-FU. The patient’s satisfaction at 2Y-FU was similar between the different techniques. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, pain on postoperative day 1 was the only independent prognostic factor of the patient’s satisfaction at 2Y-FU.
In this large series, no statistical differences were found between the four studied techniques regarding the 2Y-Fu results and patients’ satisfaction. Provided the technique has been done properly (expert surgeon) the results and the patients’ satisfaction are fair and equivalent among the four studied techniques. In a multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of bad late results was severe pain at D1.
KeywordsQuality of life Inguinal hernia repair TIPP Lichtenstein TEP TAPP Registry
The Club Hernie group: J-F. Ain: Polyclinique Val de Saone, Macon, France, M. Beck: Clinique Ambroise Paré, Thionville, France, C. Barrat: Hôpital Universitaire Jean Verdier, Bondy, France, C. Berney: Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, Australia, J-L. Berrod: Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph, Paris, France, D. Binot: MCO Côte d’Opale, Boulogne sur Mer, France, M-J. Boudet: Clinique Alleray-Labrouste, Paris, France, J. Bousquet: Hôpital Privé de la Chataigneraie, Montpellier, France, D. Blazquez: Clinique Jeanne d’Arc, Paris, France, A. Bonan: Hôpital Privé d’Antony, Antony, France, O. Cas: Centre Médico Chirurgical Fondation WALLERSTEIN, Arès, France, A. Champault-Fezais: Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph, Paris, France, P. Chastan: Bordeaux, France, J-L. Cardin: Polyclinique du Maine, Laval, France, J-M. Chollet: Hôpital Privé d’Antony, Antony, France, J-P. Cossa: CMC Bizet, Paris, France, A. Dabrowski: Clinique de Saint Omer, Saint Omer, France, S. Démaret: Clinique Saint Vincent, Besançon, France, F. Drissi: CHU Nantes, Nantes, France, J. Durou: Clinique de Villeneuve d’Ascq, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, T. Dugue: Clinique de Saint Omer, Saint Omer, France, J-P. Faure: CHRU Poitiers, Poitiers, France, D. Framery: CMC de la Baie de Morlaix, Morlaix, France, G. Fromont: Clinique de Bois Bernard, Bois Bernard, France, A. Gainant: CHRU Limoges, Limoges, France, L. Gauduchon: CHRU Amiens, France, L. Genser: CHU Pitié-Sampétrière, Paris, France, J-F. Gillion: Hôpital Privé d’Antony, Antony, France, A. Guillaud: Clinique du Renaison, Roanne, France, C. Jacquin: CH du Prado, Marseille, France, F. Jurczak: Clinique Mutualiste, Saint Nazaire, France, H. Khalil: CHRU Rouen, Rouen, France, A. Lacroix: CH de Auch, Auch, France, P. Ledaguenel: Clinique Tivoli, Bordeaux, France, M. Lepère: Clinique Saint Charles, La Roche-sur-Yon, France, D. Lépront: Polyclinique de Navarre, Pau, France, N. Letoux: Clinique Jeanne d’Arc, Paris, France, J. Loriau: Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph, Paris, E. Magne: Clinique Tivoli, Bordeaux, France, P. Ngo: Hôpital Américain, Neuilly, France, O. Oberlin: Croix St Simon Diaconesses, Paris, France, D. Paterne: Clinique Tivoli, Bordeaux, France, X. Pavis d’Escurac: Strasbourg, France, L. Potiron: Clinique Jules Verne, Nantes, France, Y. Renard: CHRU Reims, Reims, France, M. Soler: Polyclinique Saint Jean, Cagnes-sur-Mer, France.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
BR, JFG, POD and NM declare no conflict of interest.
The registry complies with the requirements of the French ‘Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés’ (CNIL; registration number 1993959v0), and the different specific French ethics committees.
Human and animal rights
The study including human participants has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to all surgical procedures.
- 1.Bansal VK, Misra MC, Babu D et al (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 27:2373–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
- 6.Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg Acta Chir 162:447–453Google Scholar
- 14.Čadanová D, van Dijk JP, Mollen RMHG (2017) The transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP) in inguinal hernia repair does not cause less chronic pain in relation to the ProGrip technique: a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing the TIPP technique, using the PolySoft mesh, with the ProGrip self-fixing semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 21:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1522-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gillion J-F, Fromont G, Lepère M et al (2016) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a novel intraperitoneal lightweight mesh coated with hyaluronic acid: 1-year follow-up from a case-control study using the Hernia-Club registry. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 20:711–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1501-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gillion J-F, Chollet J-M (2013) Chronic pain and quality of life (QoL) after transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair using a totally extraperitoneal, parietalized, Polysoft ® memory ring patch: a series of 622 hernia repairs in 525 patients. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 17:683–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1121-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Bignell M, Partridge G, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2012) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal-TAPP) versus open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia: incidence of chronic groin pain and impact on quality of life: results of 10 year follow-up. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 16:635–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0940-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kofler M et al (2017) Lichtenstein versus total extraperitoneal patch plasty versus transabdominal patch plasty technique for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 57,906 patients. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002541 Google Scholar