Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair
The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair technique was first described for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and later applied to laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. We present our center’s early operative outcomes utilizing principles of this technique during robotic ventral and incisional hernia repair for implementation of the robotic eTEP Rives–Stoppa (eRS) and eTEP transversus abdominis release (eTAR) techniques.
A review of a prospectively maintained database of hernia patients was conducted identifying 37 patients who underwent robotic eTEP for ventral, incisional, flank or parastomal hernia repair between March and October 2017. All patients underwent retrorectus dissection with selective utilization of transversus abdominis release (TAR) as indicated.
37 patients including 13 male and 24 female with mean age, body mass index, and ASA score of 54, 35.5, and 2.4, respectively, underwent a mean operation room time of 198 min. Mean length of stay was 0.7 days. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients developed subcutaneous seromas requiring interventional radiology drainage. One patient was readmitted at 30 days for PO intolerance that was managed expectantly. Mean postoperative follow-up visit occurred at 36 days with no sign of early hernia recurrences.
The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach is both safe and feasible in robotic-assisted repair of ventral and incisional hernias. Although long-term outcomes and patient selection criteria require further study, we believe this technique will become an important tool in the armamentarium of minimally invasive hernia surgeons.
KeywordsHernia Ventral hernia Incisional hernia Robotic hernia surgery Extended-view totally extraperitoneal eTEP eRS eTAR AWR Abdominal wall reconstruction
Figures are reprinted from “Robotic Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Access Rives-Stoppa Repair”, by Belyansky I, Sanford Z, Weltz AS, Zahiri HR, 2018, Atlas of Robotic Surgery. Copyright (2018) by Ciné-Med, Inc.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Igor Belyansky's disclosures are honoraria and consulting fees from Intuitive, Bard, Medtronic, and Allergan. Drs. H. Reza Zahiri, Zachary Sanford, Adam S. Weltz, and Adrian E. Park have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
All authors certify that they accept responsibility as an author and have contributed to the concept, data gathering, analysis, manuscript drafting, and give their final approval.
- 5.Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Lango T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic S (2015) European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc 29:253–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J, Huang LC, Phillips S, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK (2017) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair. A comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society quality collaborative. Ann Surg 267:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ballecer C, Prebil B (2015) Robotic Rives-Stoppa incisional hernia repair with bilateral posterior component separation. Abdom Wall Repair J 3:12–16Google Scholar