Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 685–690 | Cite as

The modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair with in situ re-ostomy has low recurrence rate

  • Zhibo Yan
  • Haifeng Zhang
  • Hanxiang Zhan
  • Dong Wu
  • Yugang Cheng
  • Qunzheng Wu
  • Guangyong Zhang
How-I-Do-It
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to present a modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair technique with in situ re-ostomy and show its safety and feasibility at a mid-term follow-up.

Methods

The technique begins with adhesiolysis during laparoscopy. An annular incision is made between the skin and stomal mucosa. Then, after all adhesions of the stomal bowel and its mesentery are separated from the hernial sac, the stomal bowel is delivered through the keyhole mesh. The mesh is then stitched to the stomal bowel and placed intraperitoneally. The hernial ring is narrowed, and the mesh is further stitched to the hernial ring and stomal tube. After the mesh is fixed, the redundant stomal bowel is shortened, and a new in situ stoma is matured in the conventional way.

Results

Altogether, 65 consecutive patients underwent successful hernia repair via a modified laparoscopic keyhole with in situ re-ostomy. Two of the patients had recurrent parastomal hernias. No mortalities occurred during the perioperative period. Morbidities included two cases of seroma and three of ileus, all of which were cured with conservative treatment. In addition, one case of intestinal perforation was rescued by intestinal resection and enteroenterostomy. Median follow-up was 29 months (range 3–60 months). No complications of mesh-related infection or patch erosion were noted during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair with in situ re-ostomy is a safe procedure with a low recurrence rate at the mid-term follow-up.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Parastomal hernia Re-ostomy Recurrent Abdominal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81600059/81370496) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province Grants (ZR2014HQ004). We thank Nancy Schatken BS, MT(ASCP), from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (http://www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

Conception: Guangyong Zhang, Haifeng Zhang; Acquisition of data: Zhibo Yan, Haifeng Zhang, Hanxiang Zhan, Dong Wu, Yugang Cheng, Qunzheng Wu; Analysis of data: all authors; Writing: Zhibo Yan, Guangyong Zhang; Critical revision: all authors; Final approval: all authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Hiranyakas A, Ho YH (2010) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Dis Colon Rectum 9:1334–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansson BM, Slater NJ, As VDV, Groenewoud HM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL (2013) The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis 15:202–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansson BM, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh IH (2009) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 23:1456–1459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muysoms EE, Hauters PJ, Van NY, Huten N, Claeys DA (2008) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 108:400–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Safadi B (2004) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: early results. Surg Endosc 18:676–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, Sánchez-García JL, Jiménez-Gómez LM, Martí M, Vallribera F, Fraccalvieri D, Serracant A, Kreisler E (2016) Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 264:923–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornille JB, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:2–11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosch R, Junge K, Böhm G, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2008) Surgical treatment and prophylaxis of parastomal hernias. Zentralblatt Für Chirurgie 133:464–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Mertens PR, Kirch J, Klosterhalfen B, Lynen P, Schumpelick V (2004) Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:17–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, Lynen P, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2003) Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1668–1673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chapman SJ, Drake TM, Young N, Jayne DG (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum 60:107–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Israelsson LA (2005) Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 29:1086–1089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hogg ME, King PM, Keenan RA (2009) A modified lateral approach to parastomal hernia repair. Surgeon 7:56–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang X, He K, Rong H, Shen Q, Yao Q (2017) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia. Ann Transl Med 5:45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryLinyi People’s HospitalLinyiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations