Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 803–808 | Cite as

Gasless single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience

  • M. W. V. Ng
  • K. C. NgEmail author
How-I-Do-It

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic hernioplasty has been gaining its popularity in the past decade for its rapid recovery. Single-incision surgery, as its possible advancement, has also received more attention. Traditional laparoscopic surgery with carbon dioxide insufflation precluded patients with underlying cardiovascular or pulmonary disease from minimal invasive surgery. We report our early experience with gasless single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair via totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2012, 15 consecutive patients underwent gasless laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by the same surgeon, using abdominal wall lifting technique with a self-tailored device. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative findings and postoperative outcomes were analyzed prospectively.

Results

Of the 15 patients, all had unilateral hernia. Two presented with acute incarceration, in which one required bowel resection. There was no conversion to open surgery or insertion of additional ports. The median operating time was 80 min (range 51–130) for elective repair and 178 min (range 135–220) for emergency repair. The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1–6) with minimal requirement of analgesics. Median time taken to resume normal activity was 2 days (range 1–6). No major medical complications or mesh infection was encountered. One patient developed hematoma and was successfully managed by salvage laparoscopic reoperation. During a median follow-up of 54 months (range 38–60), none experienced recurrence.

Conclusion

Gasless single-incision TEP is feasible with favorable results, even in high-risk patients with compromised cardiorespiratory status. This technique can also be applied to emergency setting in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia requiring bowel resection. Future large scale randomized study is needed to verify the effectiveness of this technique.

Keywords

Single port Gasless Total extraperitoneal repair Inguinal hernia 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The following authors, M. W. V. N. and K. C. N., have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

The procedure protocol was approved in our surgical developmental review board.

Human and animal rights

Compliance with ethical standards was adhered to through Institutional Review Board approval and the study including human participants have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Operation was arranged after receiving informed consent from the patient.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 9371 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 9470 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 9689 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 9003 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 9540 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (MP4 9255 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (MP4 9702 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (MP4 5490 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J, Bisgaard T, Buhck H, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Grimes KL, Klinge U, Koeckerling F, Kumar S, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2015) Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society) [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 29:289–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai YC, Ho CH, Tai HC, Chung SD, Chueh SC (2013) Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:4684–4692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, Lomanto D (2014) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28:3053–3058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JH, An CH, Lee YS, Kim HY, Lee JI (2015) Single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TEP): experience of 512 procedures. Hernia 19(3):417–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buckley FP III, Vassaur H, Monsivais S, Sharp NE, Jupiter D, Watson R, Eckford J (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:30–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang GPC, Tung KLM (2015) A comparative study of single incision versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:401–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagai H, Kondo Y, Yasuda T, Kasahara K, Kanazawa K (1993) An abdominal wall-lift method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without peritoneal insufflation. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(3):175–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hashimoto D, Nayeem SA, Kajiwara S, Hoshino T (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an approach without pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 7(1):54–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ikeda N, Ueno M, Kanamura T, Sho M, Sasaki Y, Enomoto K, Kunishige T, Nogi K, Kosugi T, Nakagawa K, Sakaguchi H, Hidaka S, Ochi T, Nakajima Y (2014) Simple technique for gasless transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:359–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):CD006574Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang G, Liu S, Yu W, Wang L, Liu N, Li F, Hu S (2011) Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with abdominal wall lift in general surgery: initial experience. Surg Endosc 25:298–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamada H, Ohki H, Fujimoto K, Okutsu Y (2004) Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with abdominal wall lift during pregnancy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Masui 53(10):1155–1158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sesti F, Melgrati L, Damiani A, Piccione E (2006) Isobaric (gasless) laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. An overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 129(1):9–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ulker K, Huseyinoglu U, Kilic N (2013) Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS). Surg Endosc 27(1):189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ulker K, Huseyinoglu U (2013) Comparison of tubal sterilization procedures performed by keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery and conventional CO2 laparoscopy: a case controlled clinical study. Sci World J 2013:963615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23:920–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirvonen EA, Poikolainen EO, Paakkonen ME, Nuutinen LS (2000) The adverse hemodynamic effects of anesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14(3):272–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang JK, Chen WS, Wang SJ, Lin JK (2010) A novel lifting system for minimally accessed surgery: a prospective comparison between “Laparo-V” gasless and CO2 pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(8):997–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ulker K, Huseyinoglu U, Cicek M (2015) Early postoperative pain after keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery. JSLS 19(1):e2013.00392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liem MSL, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR (2006) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 191:381–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ng KC, Wong KW, Mok PTF (2010) An early experience of a novel technique: “no touch approach” preperitoneal hernioplasty for the incarcerated inguinal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(10):851–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCaritas Medical CentreKowloonPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations