Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 479–486 | Cite as

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: outcomes in primary versus incisional hernias: no effect of defect closure

  • J. R. Lambrecht
  • A. Vaktskjold
  • E. Trondsen
  • O. M. Øyen
  • O. Reiertsen
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Supposing divergent aetiology, we found it interesting to investigate outcomes between primary (PH) versus incisional (IH) hernias. In addition, we wanted to analyse the effect of defect closure and mesh fixation techniques.

Methods

37 patients with PH and 70 with IH were enrolled in a prospective cohort-study, treated with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) and randomised to ± transfascial sutures. In addition, we analysed results from a retrospective study with 36 PH and 51 IH patients. Mean follow-up time was 38 months in the prospective study and 27 months in the retrospective study.

Results

35 % of PH’s and 10 % of IH’s were recurrences after previous suture repair. No late infections or mesh removals occurred. Recurrence rates in the prospective study were 0 vs. 4.3 % (p = 0.55) and the complication rates were 16 vs. 27 % (p = 0.24) in favour of the PH cohort. The IH group had a mesh protrusion rate of 13 vs. 5 % in the PH group (p = 0.32), and significantly (p < 0.01) larger hernias and adhesion score, longer operating time (100 vs. 79 min) and admission time (2.8 vs. 1.6 days). Closure of the hernia defect did not influence rate of seroma, pain at 2 months, protrusion or recurrence. An overall increased complication rate was seen after defect closure (OR 3.42; CI 1.25–9.33).

Conclusions

With PH, in comparison to IH treated with LVHR, no differences were observed regarding recurrence, protrusion or complication rates. Defect closure (raphe), when using absorbable suture, did not benefit long-term outcomes and caused a higher overall complication rate. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00455299).

Keywords

Hernia Ventral Primary Incisional Laparoscopy Repair 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted without funding, but we thank involved hospitals (Oslo University Hospital and Innlandet Hospital Trust) for help from logistic personnel and loan of out-patient facilities. We thank TYCO Healthcare (now Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) for the gift of a fax machine to report serious adverse events. None of the authors or authors’ spouses are employed or in any other manner economically involved in the medical industry. All authors are employees of the Kingdom of Norway.

Conflict of interest

JL declares non-financial support (fax machine) from Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA but otherwise no conflict of interest. AV declares no conflict of interest. ET declares no conflict of interest. OØ declares no conflict of interest. OR declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurian A, Gallagher S, Cheeyandira A, Josloff R (2010) Laparoscopic repair of primary versus incisional ventral hernias: time to recognize the differences? Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 14(4):383–387. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0649-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stirler VM, Schoenmaeckers EJ, de Haas RJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2014) Laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias: the differences must be acknowledged : a prospective cohort analysis of 1,088 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 28(3):891–895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3243-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Subramanian A, Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2013) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: primary versus secondary hernias. J Surg Res 181(1):e1–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang MK, Berger RL, Li LT, Davila JA, Hicks SC, Kao LS (2013) Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias. JAMA Surg 148(11):1043–1048. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter SA, Hicks SC, Brahmbhatt R, Liang MK (2014) Recurrence and Pseudorecurrence after Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: predictors and Patient-focused Outcomes. Am Surg 80(2):138–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lambrecht JR, Skauby M, Trondsen E, Vaktskjold A, Oyen OM (2014) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia in solid organ-transplanted patients: the method of choice? Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transpl. doi: 10.1111/tri.12327 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL (2003) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 7(4):191–196. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0143-z Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano A, Bustos M, Martin J, Morales-Mendez S (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures–double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Int Surg 90(3 Suppl):S56–S62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zuhlke H, Lorenz E, Straub E, Savvas V (1990) [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir:8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lambrecht J (2011) Overlap-coefficient for the relationship between mesh size and defect size in laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery. Hernia J Hernias Abdom wall Surg 15(4):2. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0817-x Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dalenback J, Andersson C, Ribokas D, Rimback G (2013) Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 17(4):493–497. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0988-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ponten JE, Leenders BJ, Charbon JA, Nienhuijs SW (2014) A consecutive series of 235 epigastric hernias. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1227-7 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Westen M, Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN, Stigaard T, Bisgaard T (2014) Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence. Langenbeck’s Archives Surg/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 399(1):65–69. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1119-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franz MG (2006) The biology of hernias and the abdominal wall. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 10(6):462–471. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0144-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henriksen NA, Yadete DH, Sorensen LT, Agren MS, Jorgensen LN (2011) Connective tissue alteration in abdominal wall hernia. The Br J Surg 98(2):210–219. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klinge U, Binnebosel M, Rosch R, Mertens P (2006) Hernia recurrence as a problem of biology and collagen. J Minimal Access Surg 2(3):151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, Lynen P, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2003) Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 387(11–12):427–432. doi: 10.1007/s00423-002-0345-3 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosch R, Klinge U, Si Z, Junge K, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) A role for the collagen I/III and MMP-1/-13 genes in primary inguinal hernia? BMC Med Genetics 3:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Donahue TR, Hiatt JR, Busuttil RW (2006) Collagenase and surgical disease. Hernia:J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 10(6):478–485. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0146-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lynen Jansen P, Klinge U, Mertens PR (2006) Hernia disease and collagen gene regulation: are there clues for intervention? Hernia Journa lf hernias and abdominal wall surgery 10(6):486–491. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0147-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli GS, Fortelny RH, Kockerling F, Kukleta J, Leblanc K, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Bansal VK, Morales-Conde S, Ramshaw B, Reinpold W, Rim S, Rohr M, Schrittwieser R, Simon T, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Timoney M, Chowbey P (2013) Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-Part 1. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg 37(11):2548–2552. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Li LT, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2013) Trans-cutaneous Closure of Central Defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg 37(1):42–51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1810-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc 25(5):1452–1457. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1413-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL (2007) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc 21(3):391–395. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9014-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guerin G, Turquier F (2013) Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach. Hernia J Hernias Abdoml Wall Surg 17(5):647–655. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1050-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moreno-Egea A, Alcaraz AC, Cuervo MC (2013) Surgical options in lumbar hernia: laparoscopic versus open repair. A long-term prospective study. Surg Innov 20(4):331–344. doi: 10.1177/1553350612458726 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Madankumar M, Senthilkumar K (2008) Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias: suturing and intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay. A retrospective study. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 12(3):251–256. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0337-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Lambrecht
    • 1
  • A. Vaktskjold
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Trondsen
    • 3
  • O. M. Øyen
    • 4
  • O. Reiertsen
    • 5
  1. 1.Surgical DepartmentInnlandet Hospital TrustGjøvikNorway
  2. 2.Institute of Public HealthHedmark University CollegeElverumNorway
  3. 3.Oslo University Hospital, UllevålOsloNorway
  4. 4.Oslo University Hospital, RikshospitaletOsloNorway
  5. 5.Akershus University HospitalLørenskogNorway

Personalised recommendations