, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 771–774 | Cite as

Proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: avoiding fixation to undesired structures

  • J. L. Porrero
  • O. Cano-ValderramaEmail author
  • M. J. Castillo
  • M. T. Alonso



Self-gripping meshes have been developed to avoid fixing sutures during inguinal hernia repair. Operative time is shorter when using a self-gripping mesh than with conventional Lichtenstein repair. However, these meshes can be difficult to handle because they fix to undesired structures. The aim of this report is to describe a new technique to avoid this problem.


Inguinal hernia dissection is made as usual. Once dissection is finished, a Parietex ProGrip® (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) flat sheet mesh is cut depending on the size needed. A small split is made between the lower and medium third of the mesh to mark where the split for the spermatic cord will be. Using this mark, the upper third of the mesh is folded over the medium third, hiding the microgrips that make this a self-gripping mesh. In this way, only the lower third of the mesh has the microgrips exposed and the mesh can be fixed to the pubic bone and inguinal ligament without fixation to undesired structures. Once the lower third of the mesh is fixed, the split for the spermatic cord is completed and the upper part of the mesh is passed below the spermatic cord. Then, the mesh is unfolded to expose the microgrips again and the medium and upper third of the mesh are descended to its final position.


This proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh makes the surgery easier, avoiding mesh fixation to undesired structures.


Parietex ProGrip® Self-gripping mesh Inguinal hernia repair Groin hernia Polyester mesh Inguinal hernia 


Conflict of interest

OC declares no conflict of interest, JP declares no conflict of interest, MC declares no conflict of interest, and MA declares no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Video 1: video showing the proposed technique during the surgery of an inguinal hernia (MPG 91,808 kb)


  1. 1.
    Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, Nesterenko V, Poluksht N, Lavy R, Halevy A (2014) Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 218:102–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collaboration EUHT (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 94:506–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mokete M, Earnshaw JJ (2001) Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice. Postgrad Med J 77:188–190PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willaert W, De Bacquer D, Rogiers X, Troisi R, Berrevoet F (2012) Open preperitoneal techniques versus lichtenstein repair for elective inguinal hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD008034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Massaron S, Bona S, Fumagalli U, Battafarano F, Elmore U, Rosati R (2007) Analysis of post-surgical pain after inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study of 1,440 operations. Hernia 11:517–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Porrero
    • 1
  • O. Cano-Valderrama
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. J. Castillo
    • 1
  • M. T. Alonso
    • 1
  1. 1.Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato DigestivoHospital Universitario Santa CristinaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations