Hernia

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 279–283 | Cite as

Bacteria in hernia sac: an important risk fact for surgical site infection after incarcerated hernia repair

  • L. Yang
  • H. Wang
  • X. Liang
  • T. Chen
  • W. Chen
  • Y. Song
  • J. Wang
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Although some recent reports have proven that incarcerated and/or strangulated hernia is not contraindication to mesh repair, there is still a common concern owing to increased rate of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate factors that increase the risk of SSI after incarcerated hernia repair, and to identify the pathogens related to SSI.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected prospectively over a 4-year interval from January 2007 to December 2011. A total of 121 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated hernias were analyzed.

Results

107 hernias were repaired using mesh versus 14 primary suture repairs. SSIs were observed in 9 of the 121 patients. Of 15 preoperative and intraoperative variables studied, duration of symptoms, diabetes mellitus, present of ileus, bowel resection or mesh repair performed, bacteria present in hernia sac and cloudy fluid in hernia sac were found to be significant factors predicting SSI. On multivariate analysis only bowel resection, duration of symptoms and bacteria present in hernia sac were independent variables. The most common pathogen found in hernia sac and cultured from wound drainage or swab was Escherichia coli. The strains of bacteria cultured from wound drainage or swab were same as those cultured from fluid in hernia sac in six of nine patients.

Conclusion

Gut-sourced E. coli is an important common organisms associated with SSI after incarcerated hernia repair. Prosthetic mesh could be used when no bowel resection is performed, duration of symptoms less than 24 h and fluid hernia sac is clear.

Keywords

Incarceration Strangulation Hernia Mesh Infection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Shanghai Bureau of the Health, China (XBR2011035, J. Wang), Shanghai Science and Technology Fund (12XD1403400, J. Wang) and Shanghai Young Teachers’ Development Program (ZZjdyx12070, H. Wang).

References

  1. 1.
    Atila K, Guler S, Inal A et al (2010) Prosthetic repair of acutely incarcerated groin hernias: a prospective clinical observational cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:563–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Topcu O, Kurt A, Soylu S et al (2013) Polypropylene mesh repair of incarcerated and strangulated hernias: a prospective clinical study. Surg Today 43:1140–1144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2013) Results of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated ventral hernias: a seven years study. Hernia 17:59–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nieuwenhuizen J, van Ramshorst GH, ten Brinke JG et al (2011) The use of mesh in acute hernia: frequency and outcome in 99 cases. Hernia 15:297–300CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sawayama H, Kanemitsu K, Okuma T et al (2013) Safety of polypropylene mesh for incarcerated groin and obturator hernias: a retrospective study of 110 patients. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1058-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaynes RP, Culver DH, Horan TC, Edwards JR, Richards C, Tolson JS (2001) Surgical site infection (SSI) rate in the United States, 1992-1993: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systen basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis 33:S69–S77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    James RC, Macleod CJ (1961) Induction of staphylococcal infections in mice with small inocula introduced on sutures. Br J Exp Pathol 42:266–277PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geesey GG (2001) Bacterial behavior at surfaces. Curr Opin Microbiol 4:296–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C (2002) Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor SG, O’Dwyer PJ (1999) Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 86:562–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mavros MN, Athanasiou S, Alexiou VG et al (2011) Risk factors for mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. World J Surg 35:2389–2398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:3–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yerdel MA, Akin EB, Dolalan S et al (2001) Effect of single-dose prophylactic ampicillin and sulbactam on wound infection after tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: the randomized, double-blind, prospective trial. Ann Surg 233:26–33CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society (1992) Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 10:599–605Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sadava EE, Krpata DM, Gao Y et al (2013) Does presoaking synthetic mesh in antibiotic solution reduce mesh infections? An experimental study. J Gastrointest Surg 17:562–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Boyle CJ, MacFie J, Mitchell CJ et al (1998) Microbiology of bacterial translocation in humans. Gut 42:29–35CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houang ET, Ahmet Z (1991) Intraoperative wound contamination during abdominal hysterectomy. J Hosp Infect 19:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN, Lambie J et al (2013) An experimental study exploring the relationship between the size of bacterial inoculum and bacterial adherence to prosthetic mesh. Surg Endosc 27:978–985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanaka N, Uchida N, Ogihara H et al (2010) Clinical study of inguinal and femoral incarcerated hernias. Surg Today 40:1144–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurt N, Oncel M, Ozkan Z, Bingul S (2003) Risk and outcome of bowel resection in patients with incarcerated groin hernias: retrospective study. World J Surg 27:741–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG et al (2004) Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome. Hernia 8:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Yang
    • 1
  • H. Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. Liang
    • 2
  • T. Chen
    • 1
  • W. Chen
    • 1
  • Y. Song
    • 3
  • J. Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biliary-Pancreatic SurgeryRen Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Therapeutics Research CentrePrincess Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, The University of QueenslandWoolloongabbaAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics, Institutes of Medical SciencesSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations