Hernia

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 799–803 | Cite as

Schley’s inguinal hernia repair: a single unit’s experience of a forgotten technique

  • B. S. H. Indrasena
  • A. L. M. A. Farhan
  • P. J. T. N. S. S. K. Jayasinghe
Original Article

Abstract

Background

This study was done to assess the effectiveness of Schley’s inguinal hernia repair. It is a retrospective study analysing the outcome of patients who received the said technique over a period of 1 year at our institution. The minimum and the maximum follow-up periods were 2 and 3 years.

Method

The patients who underwent the above technique in 2011 were reviewed retrospectively in December 2013 by going through the hospital records and examining the patients in person.

Results

105 patients had undergone surgery in 2011. The majority of them had right-sided hernias and were in 40–59 age group. Two cases of wound infection, one case of haematocele and one hernia recurrence were noted. Operating on the recurrent hernia was straightforward.

Conclusion

Schley’s inguinal hernia repair is an effective technique with favourable outcome.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia repair Schley’s inguinal hernia repair Hernioplasty Herniorrhaphy Tissue repair techniques Techniques of inguinal hernia repair Evolving techniques of inguinal hernia repair 

Notes

Conflict of interest

BSHI declares no conflict of interest, MAFAL declares no conflict of interest, PJTNSSK declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Udwadia TE (2006) Inguinal hernia repair: the total picture. J Minimal Access Surg 2(3):144–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh. Meta analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Surg 235(3):322–332PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bittner R, Schwarz J (2012) Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:271–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vrijland WW et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 89:293–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul A, Troidl H, Williams JI, Rixen D, Langen R (1994) Randomized trial of modified Bassini versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair. The Cologne hernia study group. Br J Surg 81(10):1531–1534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Veen RN et al (2007) Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 94:506–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harjai MM et al (2007) A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Lichtenstein’s tension free versus modified bassini repair in the management of Groin Hernias. MJAFI 63(1):40–43Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schley WS (1913) Rectus transplantation for deficiency of internal oblique muscle, in certain cases of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 58(4):473–478PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schley WS (1918) Rectus muscle transposition in certain cases of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 67(4):465–467PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schley WS (1920) The utilization of the external oblique aponeurosis in inguinal hernia with muscle deficiency. Ann Surg 71(6):753–754.4PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schley WS (1923) Transposition of the rectus muscle and the utilization of the external oblique aponeurosis in the radical cure of the inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 77(5):605–611PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. H. Indrasena
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. L. M. A. Farhan
    • 1
  • P. J. T. N. S. S. K. Jayasinghe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryTeaching HospitalBatticaloaSri Lanka
  2. 2.KengallaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations