Hernia

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 557–561 | Cite as

Contemporary hernia smartphone applications (apps)

  • K. Connor
  • R. R. W. Brady
  • A. de Beaux
  • B. Tulloh
Original Article

Abstract

Aims

Smartphone technology and downloadable applications (apps) have created an unprecedented opportunity for access to medical information and healthcare-related tools by clinicians and their patients. Here, we review the current smartphone apps in relation to hernias, one of the most common operations worldwide. This article presents an overview of apps relating to hernias and discusses content, the presence of medical professional involvement and commercial interests.

Methods

The most widely used smartphone app online stores (Google Play, Apple, Nokia, Blackberry, Samsung and Windows) were searched for the following hernia-related terms: hernia, inguinal, femoral, umbilical, incisional and totally extraperitoneal. Those with no reference to hernia or hernia surgery were excluded.

Results

26 smartphone apps were identified. Only 9 (35 %) had named medical professional involvement in their design/content and only 10 (38 %) were reviewed by consumers. Commercial interests/links were evident in 96 % of the apps. One app used a validated mathematical algorithm to help counsel patients about post-operative pain.

Conclusions and opportunities

There were a relatively small number of apps related to hernias in view of the worldwide frequency of hernia repair. This search identified many opportunities for the development of informative and validated evidence-based patient apps which can be recommended to patients by physicians. Greater regulation, transparency of commercial interests and involvement of medical professionals in the content and peer-review of healthcare-related apps is required.

Keywords

Hernia  Smartphone  Apps  Education  Technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Dediu H (2011) More than 60 apps have been downloaded for every iOS device sold. Asymco. Available at: http://www.asymco.com/2011/01/16/more-than-60-apps-have-been-downloaded-for-every-ios-device-sold/. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  2. 2.
    Kalias A, Chong CC, Watanabe F (2010) From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse 1:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L Type (2010) The 41 million dollar market for mobile phone medical apps: The worldwide market for medical apps. leaddiscovery.co.uk. Pub ID: KLI2831262 Available at: http://www.kaloramainformation.com/Worldwide-Mobile-Medical-2831262/. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  4. 4.
    Franko O (2011) Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Res 469(7):2042–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ofcom (2011) The communications market report: United Kingdom: A nation addicted to Smarphones.Ofcom. Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/uk/ Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  6. 6.
    Bouolos MN, Wheeles S, Tavares C, Jones R (2011) How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 10:24. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-10-24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kingsnorth AN, LeBlanc KA (2003) Management of abdominal hernias, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold, London, pp 40–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Neil S, Brady RW (2012) Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risk. Colorectal Dis 14:530–534. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freshwater MF (2011) iPhone and iPad applications for plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1397–1399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogan N, Kerin M (2011) Smartphone apps: smart patients, steer clear. Patient Educ Counselling 89:360–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton AD, Brady RR (2012) Medical professional involvement in smartphone apps in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10844.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haffey F, Brady RR, Maxwell S (2012) A comparison of the reliability of smartphone apps for opioid conversion. Drug Saf 32:111–117Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Hernia Mesh Registry. Ongoing Multicentre Study. Director: McRoy L, Contact: Lombard J, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00622583. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00622583. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  14. 14.
    Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Walters AL, Colavita PD, Zemlyak AY, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT (2012) Algorithmic prediction of chronic pain after an inguinal hernia repair. Int Hernia Congress, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heniford B (2012)The carolinas equation for quality of life- CeQOL. carolinas health care system. Available at http://www.carolinashealthcare.org/cmc-surgery-ceqol-educational-materials. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  16. 16.
    Kim-Fuchs C, Angst E, Vorburger S, Helbling C, Candinas D, Schlumpf R (2012) Prospective randomized trial comparing sutured with sutureless mesh fixation for Lichtenstein hernia repair: long-term results. Hernia 16:21–27. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0856-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89(11):1476–1479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frangou C (2012) New app predicts chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery. General surgery news 39:05 Available at: http://www.generalsurgerynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=In+the+News&d_id=69&i=May+2012&i_id=837&a_id=20819. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  19. 19.
    Rosser BA, Eccleston C (2011) Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare 17(6):308–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Connor
    • 1
  • R. R. W. Brady
    • 1
  • A. de Beaux
    • 1
  • B. Tulloh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical SurgeryEdinburgh Royal InfirmaryEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations