, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 495–500 | Cite as

No consensus on restrictions on physical activity to prevent incisional hernias after surgery

  • H.-C. PommergaardEmail author
  • J. Burcharth
  • A. Danielsen
  • E. Angenete
  • E. Haglind
  • J. Rosenberg
Original Article



In the postoperative phase after colorectal surgery, restrictions on physical activity are often recommended for patients to prevent incisional hernias. However, evidence does not support that restrictions may prevent such hernias. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of restrictions on physical activity recommended for patients operated for colorectal cancer and to evaluate the agreement among surgical specialists.


A questionnaire was sent to 60 general surgeons (specialists) in Denmark and Sweden working in academic departments of surgery with a high volume of colorectal cancer resections. The questionnaire was case based and contained questions regarding possible restrictions on physical activity recommended for patients 0–2, 2–6 and >6 weeks after resection for colorectal cancer. Agreement among the surgeon on whether restrictions should be recommended was analyzed.


Forty-one surgeons answered the questionnaire (68.3 %). The probability that two randomly chosen specialists agreed on whether restrictions should be given was generally low for the first two time periods (0–2 and 2–6 weeks); however, at >6 weeks there was a high level of agreement. Moreover, the number of restrictions recommended was different between the 41 surgeons (p < 0.0005) and more restrictions were recommended for open compared with laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.0005).


Major disagreements exist on the degree of restrictions on physical activity that should be recommended for patients after colorectal surgery. As there is no evidence to support that specific restrictions prevent hernia formation, these are merely based on personal preferences. Clinical studies in this area are therefore highly warranted.


Incisional hernia Colorectal surgery Physical activity Restrictions Prevention of hernia Ventral hernia 



We wish to thank Martin Gellerstedt and Torben Martinussen for statistical help.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Franz MG (2008) The biology of hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am 88(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.007 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robson MC, Hill DP, Woodske ME, Steed DL (2000) Wound healing trajectories as predictors of effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Arch Surg 135(7):773–777. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.7.773 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark JL (2001) Ventral incisional hernia recurrence. J Surg Res 99(1):33–39. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6093 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pathak S, Poston GJ (2006) It is highly unlikely that the development of an abdominal wall hernia can be attributable to a single strenuous event. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(2):168–171. doi: 10.1308/003588406X95093 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sanjay P, Woodward A (2007) Single strenuous event: does it predispose to inguinal herniation? Hernia 11(6):493–496. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0253-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith GD, Crosby DL, Lewis PA (1996) Inguinal hernia and a single strenuous event. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78(4):367–368PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haglind E, Angenete E, Rosenberg J (2011) Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG)—a new device for clinical studies. Lakartidningen 108(48):2518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park SW, Kim TN, Nam JK, Ha HK, Shin DG, Lee W, Kim MS, Chung MK (2012) Recovery of overall exercise ability, quality of life, and continence after 12-week combined exercise intervention in elderly patients who underwent radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled study. Urology 80(2):299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.060 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlson MA (1997) Acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am 77(3):607–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams B (2008) Supporting self-care of patients following general abdominal surgery. J Clin Nurs 17(5):584–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01857.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Knudsen MS, Christensen JK, Kehlet H (1999) Cost analysis of inguinal hernia surgery in Denmark. Ugeskr Laeger 161(38):5317–5321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kald A, Anderberg B, Carlsson P, Park PO, Smedh K (1997) Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with 1 year follow up. Eur J Surg 163(7):505–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kehlet H, Callesen T (1998) Recommendations for convalescence after hernia surgery. A questionnaire study. Ugeskr Laeger 160(7):1008–1009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2001) Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 167(2):84–96. doi: 10.1080/110241501750070510 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136(8):917–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Thomsen H, Andersen FH, Bendix JH, Sorensen OK, Skovgaard N, Kehlet H (2004) Convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 91(3):362–367. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4437 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25(4):1031–1036. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Storm RK, Schutte PJ, Hop WC, Drogendijk AC, Huikeshoven FJ (1997) The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg 225(4):365–369PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ihedioha U, Mackay G, Leung E, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22(3):689–692. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9462-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burns EM, Currie A, Bottle A, Aylin P, Darzi A, Faiz O (2013) Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery. Br J Surg 100(1):152–159. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8964 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.-C. Pommergaard
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J. Burcharth
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Danielsen
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Angenete
    • 1
    • 3
  • E. Haglind
    • 1
    • 3
  • J. Rosenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.SSORG (Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group)GöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Herlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySahlgrenska Universitetsjukhuset/ÖstraGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations