Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 883–888 | Cite as

Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

  • O. O. KochEmail author
  • M. Schurich
  • S. A. Antoniou
  • G. Spaun
  • A. Kaindlstorfer
  • R. Pointner
  • L. L. Swanstrom
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Closure of the esophageal hiatus is an important step during laparoscopic antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the preoperatively determined hiatal hernia size and the intraoperative size of the esophageal hiatus.

Methods

One hundred patients with documented chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. All patients had been subjected to barium studies before surgery, specifically to measure the presence and size of hiatal hernia. The size of the esophageal hiatus was measured during surgery by calculating the hiatal surface area (HSA). HSA size >5 cm2 was defined as large hiatal defect. Patients were grouped according to radiologic criteria: no visible hernia (n = 42), hernia size between 2 and 5 cm (n = 52), and >5 cm (n = 6). A retrospective correlation analysis between hiatal hernia size and intraoperative HSA size was undertaken.

Results

The mean radiologically predicted size of hiatal hernias was 1.81 cm (range 0–6.20 cm), while the interoperative measurement was 3.86 cm2 (range 1.51–12.38 cm2). No correlation (p < 0.05) was found between HSA and hiatal hernia size for all patients, and in the single radiologic groups, 11.9 % (5/42) of the patients who had no hernia on preoperative X-ray study had a large hiatal defect, and 66.6 % (4/6) patients with giant hiatal hernia had a HSA size <5 cm2.

Conclusions

The study clearly demonstrates that a surgeon cannot rely on preoperative findings from the barium swallow examination, because the sensitivity of a preoperative swallow is very poor.

Keywords

GERD Hiatal hernia Esophageal hiatus Reflux symptoms Fundoplication 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Oliver Owen Koch, Matthias Schurich, Stavros A. Antoniou, Georg Spaun, Adolf Kaindlstorfer, Frank A. Granderath, Rudolph Pointner and Lee L. Swanstrom have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose. All authors do disclose all institutional or corporate/commercial relationships going back 36 months and longer.

References

  1. 1.
    Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ, Maxwell JD (2004) The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20(7):719–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Chen J, Manka M (1999) The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. Gut 44:476–482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE (2008) Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22(4):601–616PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Skinner DB (1985) Hernias (hiatal, traumatic, and congenital). In: Berk JE (ed) Gastroenterology, vol 4. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 705–716 (Chapter 53)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitiek MO, Andrade RS (2010) Giant hiatal hernia. Ann Thorac Surg 89(6):S2168–S2173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, Jobe B, Polissar N, Mitsumori L, Nelson J, Swanstrom L (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–490PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Långström G, Lind T, Lundell L, LOTUS Trial Collaborators (2011) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs. esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(19):1969–1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Huprich JE, Quek M, Hagen JA, Crookes PF, Theisen J, DeMeester SR, Sillin LF, Bremner CG (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190:553–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rieger NA, Jamieson GG, Britten-Jones R, Tew S (1994) Reoperation after failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 81:1159–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soper NJ, Dunnegan D (1999) Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 229:669–677PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carlson MA, Frantzides CT (2001) Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10,735 reported cases. J Am Coll Surg 193:428–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korn O, Csendes A, Burdiles P, Braghetto I, Stein HJ (2000) Anatomic dilation of the cardia and competence of the lower esophageal sphincter: a clinical and experimental study. J Gastrointest Surg 4(4):398–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batirel HF, Uygur-Bayramicli O, Giral A, Ekici B, Bekiroglu N, Yildizeli B, Yüksel M (2010) The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch OO, Asche KU, Berger J, Weber E, Granderath FA, Pointner R (2011) Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundoplication with mesh hiatoplasty. Surg Endosc 25(4):1024–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA, Asche KU, Granderath FA, Pointner R (2011) Influence of the esophageal hiatus size on the lower esophageal sphincter, on reflux activity and on symptomatology. Dis Esophagus. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01238.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Granderath FA (2007) Measurement of the esophageal hiatus by calculation of the hiatal surface area (HSA). Why, when and how? Surg Endosc 21:2224–2225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2007) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of the hiatal surface area. Surg Endosc 21(4):542–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Pointner R (2005) Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a problem of hiatal closure more than a problem of the wrap. Surg Endosc 19(11):1439–1446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bammer T, Pointner R, Hinder RA (2000) Standard technique for laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication. Eur Surg 32:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dodds WJ, Walter B (1977) Cannon lecture: current concepts of esophageal motor function: clinical implications for radiology. Am J Roentgenol 128:549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Canon CL, Morgan DE, Einstein DM, Herts BR, Hawn MT, Johnson LF (2005) Surgical approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 25(6):1485–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE (2006) EGJ Dysfunction and GERD. In: Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Pointner R (eds) Gastroesophageal reflux disease, principles of disease, diagnosis and treatment. Springer, Wien/New York, pp 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD, SAGES Guidelines Committee (2010) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 24(11):2647–2669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reardon PR (2006) A modest proposal. Surg Endosc 20(6):995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iqbal A, Salinas V, Filipi C (2006) Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 12:2641–2655PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shaheen N (2006) The rise and fall (and rise?) of endoscopic antireflux procedures. Gastroenterology 131:952–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Curci JA, Melman LM, Thompson RW et al (2008) Elastic fiber depletion in the supporting ligaments of the gastroesophageal junction: a structural basis for the development of hiatal hernia. J Am Coll Surg 207:191–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fei L, del Genio G, Rossetti G et al (2008) Hiatal hernia recurrence: surgical complication or disease? Electron microscope findings of the diaphragmatic pillars. J Gastrointest Surg 13:459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. O. Koch
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. Schurich
    • 3
  • S. A. Antoniou
    • 2
  • G. Spaun
    • 1
  • A. Kaindlstorfer
    • 2
  • R. Pointner
    • 2
  • L. L. Swanstrom
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of General and Visceral SurgerySisters of Charity HospitalLinzAustria
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryGeneral Hospital Zell am SeeZell am SeeAustria
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyGeneral Hospital Zell am SeeZell am SeeAustria
  4. 4.Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive SurgeryThe Oregon ClinicPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations