Hernia

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 567–572

Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia

  • P. Baccari
  • J. Nifosi
  • L. Ghirardelli
  • C. Staudacher
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcome after laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy (LIVH) for fascial defect larger or equal than 15 cm in width with the outcome after LIVH in patients with hernia defect smaller than 15 cm.

Methods

From 2003 through 2010, 350 patients were submitted to LIVH. In 70 cases, hernia defect was ≥15 cm in width and in 280 was <15 cm. Incisional hernias were often recurrent, double or multiorificial. In the group of larger hernias, the rate of obesity, recurrent hernia and multiorificial hernia was 27.1, 24.2 and 12.8 %, respectively, and in the group of smaller hernias 27.3, 16.1 and 2.8 %, respectively. Patients were interviewed using McGill pain score test to measure postoperative quality of life (QoL) in the mid-term.

Results

LIVH for hernia ≥15 cm required longer surgical time (p = 0.034) and postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Besides, there were higher rate of postoperative prolonged ileus (p = 0.035) and polmonitis (p = 0.001). Overall recurrence rate was 2.6, 8.6 % for larger and 1.1 % for smaller incisional hernias, p = 0.045. Mc Gill pain test revealed no significant difference in the two groups of patients in postoperative QoL within 36 months.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic approach seems safe and effective even to repair large incisional hernia, the rate of recurrence was higher, but acceptable, if compared to smaller hernias. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of incisional hernias ≥15 cm managed by laparoscopy.

Keywords

Incisional hernia Laparoscopy Giant incisional hernia Mesh repair 

References

  1. 1.
    Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melzack R (1975) The MCGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1(3):277–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ujiki MB, Weinberger J, Varghese TK et al (2004) One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg 188:593–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS et al (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ammaturo C, Bassi G (2005) The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias. Hernia 9(4):316–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ammaturo C, Bassi UA, Bassi G (2010) Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases. Updates Surg 62:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:534–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L et al (2007) Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 11:315–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tong WMY, Hope W, Overby DW et al (2011) Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation. Ann Plast Surg 66:551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrari GC, Miranda A, Sansonna F et al (2008) Laparoscopic management of incisional hernias ≥15 cm in diameter. Hernia 12:571–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LeBlanc KA (2007) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: Are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature. Surg Endosc 21:508–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rudmik LR, Schieman C, Dixon E et al (2006) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia 10:110–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baccari P, Nifosi J, Ghirardelli L et al (2009) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair without sutures: a single-center experience with 200 cases. JLAST 19(2):175–179Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D et al (2011) Long-term follow-up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. World J Surg 35:297–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moreno-Egea A, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Aguayo-Albasini JL (2012) Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study. Am J Surg 203(1):87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Baccari
    • 1
  • J. Nifosi
    • 1
  • L. Ghirardelli
    • 1
  • C. Staudacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General SurgeryScientific Institute San Raffaele University HospitalMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations