Hernia

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 99–104 | Cite as

Use of dynamic wound closure system in conjunction with vacuum-assisted closure therapy in delayed closure of open abdomen

  • A. E. Salman
  • F. Yetişir
  • M. Aksoy
  • M. Tokaç
  • M. B. Yildirim
  • M. Kiliç
Original Article

Abstract

Aim

Definitive abdominal closure may not be possible for several days or weeks after laparotomy in damage-control surgery, abdominal compartment syndrome and intraabdominal sepsis, until the patient has stabilized. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC therapy®, KCI, San Antonio, TX, USA) and abdominal re-approximation anchor system (ABRA, Canica, Almonte, Ontario, Canada) are novel techniques in delayed closure of open abdomen. Our aim is to present the use of these strategies in the management of 7 patients with open abdomen.

Methods

Between August 2010 and December 2011, 7 patients with severe peritonitis were stabilized by laparotomy and treated with either ABRA system or ABRA system in conjunction with VAC dressing. VAC dressing applied to 4 patients initially and followed by ABRA. ABRA was applied alone to remaining 3 patients. Demographic data and patient characteristics, timing of VAC dressing and ABRA system were recorded. ICU and hospital stay and development of incisional hernia were also recorded. Stage of open abdomen, width of abdominal defect, extent to damage to fascia, and pressure sores were staged.

Results

The mean duration with VAC dressing before ABRA application was 18 days. The mean duration of ABRA application was 53 days. The average width of the abdominal defect was 18 cm. The average length of defect was 20.8 cm. Delayed primary abdominal closure was accomplished in 6 patients without further surgery. Incisional hernia with a small abdominal defect developed in 2 patients.

Conclusion

Abdominal re-approximation anchor system and VAC dressing can be used separately or in conjunction with each other for closure of delayed open abdomen successfully.

Keywords

Severe sepsis Fascia Abdomen 

References

  1. 1.
    Björck M, D’Amours SK, Hamilton AE (2011) Closure of open abdomen. Am Surg 77(Suppl 1):S58–S61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Regner JL, Kobayashi L, Coimbra R (2012) Surgical strategies for management of the abdomen. World J Surg 36(3):497–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cano-Lopez M, Armengol-Carrasco M (2011) Use of vacuum-assisted closure in open incisional hernia repair: a novel approach to prevent seroma formation. Hernia. PMID: 21667262Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sziklavari Z, Grosser C, Neu R, Schemm R, Kortner A, Szöke T et al (2011) Complex pleural emphyema can be safely treated with vacuum-assisted closure. J Cardiothorac Surg 6:130PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulusal AE, Şahin MŞ, Ulusal B, Çakmak G, Tuncay C (2011) Negative pressure wound therapy in patients with diabetic foot. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45:254–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urbaniak RM, Khuthaila DK, Khalil AJ, Khalil AJ, Hammond DC (2006) Closure of massive abdominal wall defects: a case report using the abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system. Ann Plast Surg 57:573–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dal A, Shane KF (2006) Scalp expansion with canica wound closure system: first case report. Can J Plast Surg 14:233–235Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reimer MV, Yelle JD, Reitsma B, Doumit G, Allen MA, Bell MS (2008) Management of open abdominal wounds with a dynamic fascial closure system. Can J Surg 51:209–214PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Björck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M et al (2009) Classification—important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:1154–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ, Bosley LM (1997) Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care 10:18–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verdam FJ, Dolmans DE, Loos MJ, Raber MH, de Wit RJ, Charbon JA et al (2011) Delayed primary closure of the septic abdomen with a dynamic closure system. J Surg 35:2348–2355Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boele Van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG, Bush OR, Carel Goslings J (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:199–207PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, Chang MC (2004) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen. Ann Surg 239:608–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mentula P (2011) Non-traumatic causes and the management of the open abdomen. Minerva Chir 66:153–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobs S, Simhae DA, Marsano A, Fomovsky GM, Niedt G, Wu JK (2009) Efficacy and mechanism of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy in promoting wound healing: a rodent model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1331–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venturi ML, Attinger CE, Meshabi AN, Hess CL, Graw KS (2005) Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol 6:185–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Salman
    • 2
  • F. Yetişir
    • 1
    • 4
  • M. Aksoy
    • 3
  • M. Tokaç
    • 1
  • M. B. Yildirim
    • 1
  • M. Kiliç
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryEtlik Research and Training HospitalÇankaya, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationEtlik Research and Training HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationAtatürk Research and Training HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Çankaya, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations