, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 641–645 | Cite as

Long-term results after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia

  • G. Tzovaras
  • D. Symeonidis
  • G. Koukoulis
  • I. Baloyiannis
  • S. Georgopoulou
  • C. Pratsas
  • D. Zacharoulis
Original Article



Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair is indicated for recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernias and traditionally is performed under general anesthesia. However, the feasibility of performing TAPP under spinal anesthesia has been recently reported by our team.


To assess the long-term results of TAPP repair under spinal anesthesia for primary inguinal hernia.

Materials and methods

Between January 2006 and October 2009, 94 consecutive patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were submitted to laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair under spinal anesthesia. We looked at the immediate postoperative outcome as well as the long-term outcome, mainly recurrences and incidence of chronic pain.


One patient experienced a scrotal hematoma, one patient a trocar site infection, two patients were diagnosed with an operation-related orchitis, while 31 patients (33 %) developed symptoms of urinary retention. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range 14-59), four patients (4.3 %) were diagnosed with a recurrence, while 89 % of patients reported satisfied from the procedure in the long-term. Chronic pain was not encountered in any of the patients studied. Four patients (4.3 %) reported an intermitted foreign body sensation and/or rigidity and two patients (2.1 %) numbness in the operated inguinal area.


Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair under spinal anesthesia is associated with satisfactory short- and long-term results. Use of regional anesthesia instead of the traditional general anesthesia does not seem to adversely affect the quality of repair, and moreover, it offers the patient an attractive anesthetic alternative.


TAPP repair Primary inguinal hernia Spinal anesthesia 



Drs George Tzovaras, Dimitris Symeonidis, George Koukoulis, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Stavroula Georgopoulou, Constantinos Pratsas, and Dimitris Zacharoulis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Veterans affairs cooperative studies program 456 investigators. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. NICE Guidelines (2004) (
  3. 3.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001785Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Függer R, Scheyer M (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM (2005) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004703Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zacharoulis D, Fafoulakis F, Baloyiannis I, Sioka E, Georgopoulou S, Pratsas C, Hantzi E, Tzovaras G (2009) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study. Am J Surg 198:456–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H (2010) Khalil R Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg 8:25–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203 iii–ivPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H (2002) Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention—effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:612–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C (2008) Spinal vs general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Arch Surg 143:497–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nathan JD, Pappas TN (2003) Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions. Ann Surg 238:S148–S157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tzovaras
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Symeonidis
    • 1
  • G. Koukoulis
    • 1
  • I. Baloyiannis
    • 1
  • S. Georgopoulou
    • 3
  • C. Pratsas
    • 3
  • D. Zacharoulis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital of LarissaLarissaGreece
  2. 2.LarissaGreece
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity Hospital of LarissaLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations