Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Herniamed: an Internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery

  • B. Stechemesser
  • D. A. Jacob
  • C. Schug-Paß
  • F. Köckerling
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the high frequency of hernia surgery procedures and continuous improvements, thanks to new hernia meshes and fixation techniques, in Germany, for example, the recurrence rate and rate of chronic inguinal pain after inguinal surgery are more than 10% far too high. Introduction of a hernia register in Denmark led to a significant reduction in the recurrence rate.

Methods

The aim of a hernia registry as an application-oriented outcome research tool is to monitor and evaluate (concomitant research) how the knowledge gleaned from evidence-based science is implemented in the everyday clinical setting and, ultimately, investigate its effectiveness (outcome research).

Results

The new Internet-based English- and German-language registry for the entire spectrum of inpatient and outpatient hernia surgery is designed to improve the quality of patient care and provide valid data on outcome research. Via the Internet, all relevant patient data (comorbidities, previous operations, staging, specific surgical technique, medical devices used, perioperative complications and follow-up data) can be entered into the registry database. The participating hospitals and surgeons can at any time view their own data by means of an evaluation statistics tool. The outcome research project Herniamed focuses on inguinal hernias, umbilical hernias, incisional hernias, epigastric hernias, parastomal hernias and hiatus hernias. The online-based outcome research registry meets the most stringent data protection criteria.

Conclusion

With the Internet-based English- and German-language hernia register, a new instrument is now available for outcome research in hernia surgery.

Keywords

Hernia registry Hernia Hernia research Hernia recurrence Outcome research in hernia surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Reinpold W (2008) Aktuelle Entwicklung der Hernienchirurgie. Hamburger Ärzteblatt 10:1012–1017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soleimanian A (2009) Postoperative Schmerzen im Fokus. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 106(16):752–753Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403. doi: 19636493 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, Kingsnorth AN, Mandala V, Palot JP, Schumpelick V, Simmermacher RK, Stoppa R, Flament JB (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia J hernias abdom wall surg 11(2):113–116. doi: 17353992 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414. doi: 19495920 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Versorgungsforschung Zf. Was ist Versorgungsforschung. 2011 [cited 2011 16 June]; Available from: http://www.zvfk.de/content/e2996/index_ger.html
  7. 7.
    Kehlet H (2008) Chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 95(2):135–136. doi: 18196556 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawicki PT (2008) Die Zukunft der deutschen Chirurgie liegt in der Überzeugung durch transparente Ergebnisqualität. Der Chirurg BDC 47(11):371–372Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, Negro P, Campanelli G, Miserez M (2009) New “biological” meshes: the need for a register. The EHS registry for biological prostheses: call for participating European surgeons. Hernia 13(1):103–108. doi: 18946632 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U (2009) Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 249(4):672–676. doi: 19300219 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M, Friis-Andersen H, Wara P, Jorgensen LN, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2010) Establishment and initial experiences from the Danish ventral hernia database. Hernia J hernias abdom wall surg 14(2):131–135. doi: 19937076 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Israelsson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L (2006) Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 10(3):258–261. doi: 16554979 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Stechemesser
    • 1
  • D. A. Jacob
    • 2
  • C. Schug-Paß
    • 2
  • F. Köckerling
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Auguste-ViktoriaBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Vivantes Hospital SpandauCenter for Minimally Invasive SurgeryBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations