Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial
- 1.1k Downloads
The aim of this study was to classify the polymeric prosthetics used for hernia repair based on biomaterial composition and weight in an effort to clarify to surgeons what kinds of material they are dealing with and to provide a standardized system of categorization.
Materials and methods
An intensive research effort was carried out on prosthetics that are commercially available worldwide. We conducted a search of the medical literature and companies’ websites to find the weights and thicknesses of commercially available prosthetics. Where these data were lacking, we contacted manufacturers directly in order to render the research more complete. A total of 166 products were considered for classification based on biomaterial properties. Among these, a homogeneous group of 80 polypropylene monofilament knitted or woven prosthetics was selected for classification based on weight. Weights were provided for 70 prosthetics (87%), and both the weight and thickness was provided for 40 prosthetics (50%).
Classification based on weight: Ultra-light <35 g/m2, Light ≥35 < 70 g/m2, Standard ≥70 < 140 g/m2, Heavy ≥140 g/m2. Classification based on biomaterial composition: simple (prosthetics made of one pure biomaterial); composite (prosthetics made of two or more different layers); combined (prosthetics made of two materials knitted or woven together); and biologic.
Weight and biomaterial classifications were proposed after an extensive analysis of commercially available prosthetics. The need for a common terminology is important to avoid misunderstandings among clinicians and technicians.
KeywordsProsthetic Classification Weight Biomaterial Common language
This paper concerning the classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair has been developed with the co-operation with Herniamesh Srl, [Via Fratelli Meliga 1/C, Chivasso (TO), Italy].
The authors apologize in advance for any imprecision, oversight or omission about products and companies and kindly request that companies contact them with any suggestions or comments that will further improve upon the database. A.C. declares that he received no grant support for this work.
- 2.Aquaviva D, Bounet P (1944) Cure d’une volumineuse eventration par plaque de Crinofil. Extraits Bull Soc Chir de Marseille 1944. quoted by Zagdoun J–Sordinas A, L’utilisation des plaques de nylon dans la chirurgie des hernies inguinales, Academie de Chirurgie, Sèance du 25 Nov 1959, 747–54Google Scholar
- 3.Maloney GE, Gill WG, Barclay RC (1948) Operations for hernia: technique of nylon darn. Lancet 2:45–48Google Scholar
- 5.Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LLD (1959) Marlex mesh: a new plastic mesh for replacing tissue defects, experimental studies. Am Surg 24(12):969–974Google Scholar
- 7.King MW, Soares BM, Guidoin R (1994) The chemical, physical and structural properties of synthetic biomaterials used in hernia repair. In: Bendavid R (ed) Prostheses and abdominal wall hernias. Landes, Austin, pp 191–206Google Scholar
- 10.Wilhelm TJ (2007) Sterilized mosquito net versus commercial mesh for hernia repair. an experimental study in goats in Mbarara/Uganda. Eur Surg Res 39(5):312–317. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17595545]
- 11.Clarke MG (2009) The use of sterilised polyester mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in Ghana. Hernia 13(2):155–159. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0460-3. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/u147um764l3j4227/]Google Scholar
- 13.Klingensmith ME, Chen LE, Glasgow SC, Goers TA (eds) (2007) Hernias. In: The Washington manual of surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 442–452Google Scholar
- 14.The significance of a mesh thickness in the operation of inguinal hernia (2007–2009) [http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00451893]
- 16.Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2(1):103–117Google Scholar
- 17.Kraft B (2006) Meshes and mesh-fixation techniques in TAPP hernia-repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(6):448–449Google Scholar
- 19.Lauscher JC (2008) Total extraperitoneal hernioplasty: does the long-term clinical course depend on the type of mesh? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 18:6–9Google Scholar
- 23.Holzheimer RG (2004) First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure—quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients. Eur J Med Res 9(6):323–327Google Scholar
- 27.Tamme C, Garde N, Klingler A, Hampe C, Wunder R, Köckerling F (2005) Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with titanium-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh: early results. Surg Endosc 19(8):1125–1129Google Scholar
- 28.Anderson JR (2006) Ultralightweight Polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall hernia repair. Annual Conference of the British Hernia Society, Abstract Book, British Hernia Society, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
- 29.Cobb WS et al (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136(1):1–7Google Scholar