Hernia

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 47–51

The endoscopic component separation technique for hernia repair results in reduced morbidity compared to the open component separation technique

  • M. Giurgius
  • L. Bendure
  • D. L. Davenport
  • J. S. Roth
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The component separation technique for hernia repair results in significant wound morbidity due to the need for large undermining skin flaps. The endoscopic component separation technique allows for advancement of the abdominal wall while preserving the blood supply originating from the epigastric vessels. This study compares the outcomes following hernia repair utilizing these techniques.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing component separation or endoscopic component separation hernia repair from 2008 to 2010. Patients underwent open component separation or endoscopic component separation with closure of the linea alba and reinforcement with mesh.

Results

Thirty-five patients that underwent a component separation [14 open component separation (CST) and 21 that underwent endoscopic component separation (ECST)] were identified. There was no difference in hospital length of stay (CST 5.0 ± 3.0 days vs ECST 6.3 ± 3.6 days, P = 0.28) or operating room times (CST; 268 ± 62 min vs ECST; 229 ± 57 min, P = 0.07). Wound complications occurred in 57% of CST and 19% of ECST, P = 0.03. One recurrent hernia was identified in the ECST group with a mean follow up of 8 months (range 1–21 months). No recurrences were seen in the CST group.

Conclusions

ECST is associated with comparable hospital length of stay and operative times and reduced wound complications compared to CST.

Keywords

Component separation technique Abdominal wall Hernia repair 

References

  1. 1.
    Griotto JA, Chiaramonte M, Menon NG, Singh N, Silverman R, Tufaro AP, Nahabedian M, Goldberg NH, Manson PN (2003) Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long term superiority of autologous tissue repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:106–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lowe JB, Garza JR, Bowman JL, Rohrich RJ, Strodel WE (2000) Endoscopically assisted “component separation” for closure of abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:720–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, Bemelmans MH, de Jong D, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, van Engleland MI, Bleichrodt RP (2003) “Components separation technique” for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg 96:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van der Wilt GJ, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “component separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31:756–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ko JH, Wang EC, Salvay DM et al (2009) Abdominal wall reconstruction—lessons earned from 200 “components separation” procedures. Arch Surg 144:1047–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosen MJ, Jin J, McGee MF, Williams C, Marks J, Ponsky JL (2007) Laparoscopic component separation in the single-stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal. Hernia 11:435–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maas SM, de vries RS, Van Goor H, dr Jong D, Bleichrodt RP (2002) Endoscopically assisted “component separation technique” for the repair of complicated ventral hernias. J Am Coll Surg 194:388–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Delon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shestak KC, Edington H, Johnson RR (2000) The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications and limitations revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:731–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen MJ, Williams C, Jin J, McGee MF, Schomisch S, Marks J, Ponsky J (2007) Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model. Am J Surg 194:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milburn ML, Shah PK, Friedman EB (2007) Laparoscopically assisted components separation technique for ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia 11:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Vries Reilingh TS, Bodegom TE, van Goor H, Hartman EHM, Van der Wilt GJ, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Autologous tissue repair of large abdominal wall defects. Br J Surg 94(7):791–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Giurgius
    • 2
  • L. Bendure
    • 3
  • D. L. Davenport
    • 2
  • J. S. Roth
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General SurgeryUniversity of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.University of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations