Hernia

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 485–489 | Cite as

Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings

  • J. Yang
  • D. Papandria
  • D. Rhee
  • H. Perry
  • F. Abdullah
Review

Abstract

Introduction

Hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet more than half of hernias may be untreated in African countries that lack adequate and affordable surgical care. Although this disease burden can be effectively reduced by surgical repair, public health efforts to promote repair have been sparse because of the presumed high cost of surgery.

Objective

To review the epidemiology and treatment of hernias in African countries and to assess the efficacy and safety of using low-cost mesh for repair in resource-limited settings.

Methods

An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library to locate pertinent background information and studies that used low-cost alternatives to commercial mesh.

Results

Most hernia repairs in Africa are performed as high-risk emergency procedures. When treatment is provided, fewer than 5% are repaired using implanted mesh because of its high cost, despite the demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes with tension-free repair. A total of four studies using low-cost mesh were reviewed. Three of the studies compared postoperative outcomes for repairs using sterile mosquito nets with those using commercial surgical mesh. The fourth study randomized patients to receive either an indigenous bilayer device or the Prolene Hernia System. No significant differences in recurrence or in incidence of wound complications between repairs using low-cost and commercial mesh were observed. The price of low-cost mesh was generally less than 1/1,000 the price of commercial mesh.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in outcomes between repairs using low-cost and commercial mesh. While the size of the study populations and the limited time for follow-up preclude conclusive measures of effectiveness, recurrence, and long-term complications, these studies demonstrate that providing an improved standard of surgical care need not be prohibitively expensive.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia Herniorraphy Tension-free repair Surgical mesh Low-income country Africa Low-cost mesh 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Intl J Epidemiol 25:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosemar A, Angeräs U, Rosengren A, Nordin P (2010) Effect of body mass index on groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 252:397–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States, Regions and Divisions: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2003. Population Division, US Census Bureau 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Population Statistics, Statistics Sweden (2008) http://www.scb.se/Pages/PressRelease223452.aspx. Accessed 15 July 2010
  6. 6.
    Lavy C, Tindall A, Steinlechner C et al (2007) Surgery in Malawi-a national survey of activity in rural and urban hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:722–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ozgediz D, Galukande M, Mabweijano J et al (2008) The Neglect of the global surgical workforce: experience and evidence from Uganda. World J Surg 32:1208–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilhelm TJ, Anemana S, Kyamanywa P et al (2006) Anaesthesia for elective inguinal hernia repair in rural Ghana-appeal for local anaesthesia in resource-poor countries. Trop Doct 36:147–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kingsnorth AN, Clarke MG, Shillcutt SD et al (2009) Public health and policy issues of hernia surgery in Africa. World J Surg 33:1188–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The World Bank Group Data Reports (2008) http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/ext/ddpreports. Accessed 15 July 2010
  11. 11.
    World Population Data Sheet (2010) Population reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/pdf10/10wpds_eng.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2010
  12. 12.
    Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN (2010) Cost-effectiveness of groin hernia surgery in the western region of Ghana. Arch Surg 145:954–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, Thind A (2006) Chapter 67 Surgery. In: Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edition. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mock C, Cherian M, Juillard C et al (2010) Developing priorities for addressing surgical conditions globally: furthering the link between surgery and public health policy. World J Surg 34:381–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanders DL, Porter CS, Mitchell KCD, Kingsnorth AN (2008) A prospective cohort study comparing the African and European hernia. Hernia 12:527–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohene-Yeboah M, Abantanga F, Oppong J et al (2009) Some aspects of the epidemiology of external Hernias in Kumasi, Ghana. Hernia 13:529–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hair A, Paterson C, Wright D et al (2001) What effect does the duration of an inguinal hernia have on patient symptoms? J Am Coll Surg 193:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ohana G, Manevwitch I, Well R et al (2004) Inguinal hernia: challenging the traditional indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients. Hernia 8:117–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Dwyer PJ, Norrie J, Alant A et al (2006) Observation or operation for patients with an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 244:167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO et al (2006) Watchful waiting versus repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. JAMA 295:285–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cameron AEP (1994) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of direct and indirect inguinal hernia. BJS 81:250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leubner KD, Chop WM, Ewigman B, Loven B (2007) What is the risk of bowel strangulation in an adult with an untreated inguinal hernia? Family Phys Inq Net 56:1039–1041Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohene-Yeboah M (2003) Strangulated external hernias in Kumasi. West Afr J Med 22:310–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Odula P (2004) Groin hernia in Mulago Hospital, Kampala. East Central Afr J Surg 9:48–52Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elrashied M, Widatalla AH, Ahmed ME (2007) External strangulated hernia in Khartoum, Sudan. East Afr Med J 84:379–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kulah B, Duzgun AP, Moran M et al (2001) Emergency hernia repairs in elderly patients. Am J Surg 182:455–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT et al (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Álvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG et al (2004) Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome. Hernia 8:121–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choo S, Perry H, Hesse AA, et al. (2010) Assessment of capacity for surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia in 17 Ghanaian hospital using a WHO assessment tool. Trop Med Intl HealthGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prieto-Díaz-Chávez E et al (2009) A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Hernia 13:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al. (2009) Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. The Cochrane LibraryGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scott N, Go PM, Graham P, et al. (2002) Open Mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair-review. The Cochrane LibraryGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PM et al (1997) Long term followup (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:352–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Just E, et al. (2010) Reduction of the complication rate in Liechtenstein hernia repair. Intl J Surg 1–4Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nicholson S (1999) Inguinal hernia repair. BJS 86:577–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN (2007) Operation hernia: humanitarian hernia repairs in Ghana. Hernia 11:389–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilhelm TJ, Freudenberg S, Jonas E et al (2007) Sterilized mosquito net versus commercial mesh for hernia repair: an experimental study in goats in Mbarara/Uganda. Eur Surg Res 39:312–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    World Health Organization (WHO) Statistical information system. http://www.who.int.whosis/en. Accessed 15 July 2010
  41. 41.
    Freudenberg S, Sano D, Ouangré E et al (2006) Commercial mesh versus nylon mosquito net for hernia repair. A randomized double-blind study in Burkina Faso. World J Surg 30:1784–1789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Clarke MG, Oppong C, Simmermacher R et al (2009) The use of sterilized polyester mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in Ghana. Hernia 13:155–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tongaonkar RR, Reddy BV, Mehta VK et al (2003) Preliminary multicentric trial of cheap indigenous mosquito-net cloth for tension-free hernia repair. Indian J Surg 65:89–95Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Laxminarayan R, Mills AJ, Breman JG et al (2006) Advancement of global health: key messages from the disease control priorities project. Lancet 367:1193–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chauhan A, Tiwari S, Gupta A (2007) Study of efficacy of bilayer mesh device versus conventional polypropylene hernia system in inguinal hernia repair: early results. World J Surg 31:1356–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (Outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Yang
    • 1
  • D. Papandria
    • 1
  • D. Rhee
    • 1
  • H. Perry
    • 2
  • F. Abdullah
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Health Systems Program, Department of International HealthBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations