, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 389–395 | Cite as

Prosthetic strap system for simplified ventral hernia repair: results of a porcine experimental model

  • G. AmatoEmail author
  • G. Romano
  • A. Agrusa
  • G. Cassata
  • G. Salamone
  • G. Gulotta
Original Article



Aiming to achieve a simplified ventral hernia repair, a proprietary oval-shaped mesh was experimentally tested in a porcine model. The mesh is structured with a large central body and radiating straps. The friction of the straps passing through the tissues are hypothesized to be adequate to maintain the position of the mesh during tissue ingrowth, avoiding classic point fixation while ensuring a wide coverage of the abdomen.


The mesh, having six radial straps, was placed using a sublay preperitoneal technique in four pigs. All straps were passed laterally through the abdominal wall and exteriorized from the skin. The straps were trimmed at the level of the skin, allowing the stumps to recoil into the subcutaneous space. The animals were euthanized at 1 and 4 months to determine the integration of the straps.


Macroscopically, all 24 straps were firmly incorporated within the abdominal wall. The tension-free placement of the mesh by using the straps was effective. The friction of the straps passing through the tissues was adequate to keep the mesh well orientated. No dislocation of the implants was observed. The strap system also allowed a broader coverage of the abdominal wall, far beyond the wound opening.


The described arm system of the aforementioned implant seems to be effective in eliminating point fixation of the mesh. The fixation arms seemed to have ensured that the mesh stayed orientated in all of the animals. A very wide lateral mesh placement was accomplished, assuring sufficient defect overlap when shrinkage occurs.


Ventral hernia Prostheses and implants Incorporation Surgical fixation devices Friction 


  1. 1.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V (2001) Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 5:113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Gorfine SR, Kreel I (2002) Rives–Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias: experience with 57 patients. Hernia 6:120–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Voeller GR, Ramshaw B, Park AE, Heniford BT (1999) Incisional hernia. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):635–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS (1998) Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 64(3):276–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klinge U, Conze J, Klosterhalfen B, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1996) Changes in abdominal wall mechanics after mesh implantation. Experimental changes in mesh stability. Langenbecks Arch Chir 381(6):323–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Linden FT, van Vroonhoven TJ (1988) Long-term results after surgical correction of incisional hernia. Neth J Surg 40(5):127–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langer S, Christiansen J (1985) Long-term results after incisional hernia repair. Acta Chir Scand 151:217–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geçim IE, Koçak S, Ersoz S, Bumin C, Aribal D (1996) Recurrence after incisional hernia repair: results and risk factors. Surg Today 26:607–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McLanahan D, King LT, Weems C, Novotney M, Gibson K (1997) Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia. Am J Surg 173(5):445–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Hadchity Y (1999) Surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft: a report on 250 cases. Arch Surg 134:1260–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langer C, Neufang T, Kley C, Liersch T, Becker H (2001) Central mesh recurrence after incisional hernia repair with Marlex—are the meshes strong enough? Hernia 5(3):164–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Kreel I, Gelernt IM (1999) Twelve-year experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Mt Sinai J Med 66:20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M (1994) Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications. Langenbecks Arch Chir 379(3):168–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5(3):142–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Awad ZT, Puri V, LeBlanc K, Stoppa R, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Iqbal A, Filipi CJ (2005) Mechanisms of ventral hernia recurrence after mesh repair and a new proposed classification. J Am Coll Surg 201(1):132–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boukerrou M, Rubod C, Dedet B, Boodhum R, Nayama M, Cosson M (2008) Tissue resistance of the tension-free procedure: what about healing? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(3):397–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:743–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2008) Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):787–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I; West of Scotland Study Group (2008) Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115(1):22–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boccon-Gibod L, Hermieu JF, Toublanc M, Delmas V, Ravery V (2004) International Continence Society (ICS) Congress 2004, Abstract 681Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hernia Trialists Collaboration EU (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeBord JR (1998) The historical development of prosthetics in hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 78:973–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Read RC (2003) Recent advances in the repair of groin herniation. Curr Probl Surg 40(1):13–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Malik B, Lambaudie E, Collinet P, Dubois P, Cosson M (2007) Mechanical resistance of synthetic meshes for incontinence or prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 18:183–187Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alcalay M, Livne M, Shidlovsky D, Hod E (2009) Pullout force of polypropylene mesh deployed by EndoFast Reliant fastener—a comparative study in a sheep model. International Continence Society (ICS) Congress 2009, Abstract 543Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Amato
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Romano
    • 1
  • A. Agrusa
    • 1
  • G. Cassata
    • 2
  • G. Salamone
    • 1
  • G. Gulotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Urgency, and Organ TransplantationUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Experimental Zooprophylactic InstitutePalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations