Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model
- First Online:
- 215 Downloads
Current hernia literature shows that the use of mesh in ventral hernia repair reduces the risk of recurrence significantly. In laparoscopic repair, the mesh is placed intraperitoneally. Accordingly, the close contact between mesh and viscera involves a risk of adhesion formation. In this experimental study, we examined the degree of de novo adhesion formation over time to currently available meshes.
Sixteen sheep each received laparoscopic placement of four (10 × 10 cm) meshes on intact peritoneum. Two different mesh materials (coated vs. non-coated) and two different fixation devices (absorbable/non-absorbable) were investigated. (Parietex®Composite, DynaMesh®IPOM, ProTack™ and AbsorbaTack™). After 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, four animals, respectively, underwent a new laparoscopy to determine the extent of adhesions to the mesh.
Parietex®Composite significantly reduced the formation of intraabdominal adhesions compared to DynaMesh®IPOM. The mean extent of adhesions increases over time without reaching a steady state within the first 12 months after laparoscopic placement.
This is the first long-term (18 months) experimental study on adhesion formation in sheep after laparoscopic placement of mesh and may serve as a template for future studies on meshes before marketing.
KeywordsIntraabdominal adhesions Experimental study Adhesion Laparoscopy Hernia Mesh IPOM
- 21.van GH (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):25–34Google Scholar
- 23.Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Kockerling F (2006) A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:402–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Schug-Pass C, Sommerer F, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2009) The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily? Experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model. Surg Endosc 23:487–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.TheSurgical Membrane Study Group (1992) Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: a multicenter clinical investigation. Fertil Steril 57:921–923Google Scholar
- 39.Holmdahl L (1997) The role of fibrinolysis in adhesion formation. Eur J Surg 163(Suppl 577):24–31Google Scholar
- 43.Morales-Conde S (2008) Tissell in open and laparooscopic venttral hernia repair. Abstract book. 30th E.H.S congress, Sevilla, SpainGoogle Scholar
- 44.Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Croce E (2008) Use of fibrin glue (tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Abstract book. 30th E.H.S congress, Sevilla, SpainGoogle Scholar