Hernia

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 13–21

Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

  • J. R. Eriksen
  • P. Poornoroozy
  • L. N. Jørgensen
  • B. Jacobsen
  • H. U. Friis-Andersen
  • J. Rosenberg
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is a well established procedure in the treatment of ventral hernias. It is our clinical experience that patients suffer intense postoperative pain, but this issue and other recovery parameters have not been studied in detail.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with hernias >3 cm prospectively underwent LVHR using “double-crown” titanium tack mesh fixation. Pre- and postoperative pain was measured on a 0–100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and health-related quality of life was measured using the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Several other recovery parameters were measured systematically in the 6 months follow-up period.

Results

We observed no recurrences or severe complications in the follow-up period (n = 31 at day 30 and n = 28 after 6 months). The median in-hospital stay was 2 days (range 0–5). Patients reported significantly more pain during activity than at rest at all times (p < 0.05). The median VAS-pain score during activity vs. at rest at discharge was 60 and 31, respectively. The median VAS-pain score during activity on the day of operation (day 0) was 78; it returned to baseline values at day 30 (p = 0.148) and, after 6 months, it was below the preoperative score (p = 0.01). The scores for general well-being and fatigue returned to baseline values at days 3 and 30, respectively, and at 6 months, they had both significantly improved compared with preoperative values (p = 0.005). The SF-36 scores were significantly worse in three domains at day 30 (p < 0.005). After 6 months, the bodily pain score had increased significantly compared with preoperative values (p < 0.005) and all eight scales were comparable to the Danish reference population scores. Patients resumed normal daily activities after a median of 14 days (range 1–38). Smokers and patients with hard physical demands at work took a significantly longer amount of time to resume work compared with non-smokers (30 vs. 9 days, p < 0.005) and patients with light work demands (29 vs. 9 days, p < 0.05), respectively. VAS-pain scores were strongly correlated to general well-being (r = −0.8, p < 0.001), patient satisfaction (r = −0.67, p < 0.001) and quality of life (r = −0.63, p < 0.001). We found no significant correlation between the number of tacks used (median 59) and postoperative pain.

Conclusion

LVHR was associated with considerable postoperative pain and fatigue in the first postoperative month, prolonging the time of convalescence and significantly affecting patients’ quality of life up to 6 months postoperatively. Mesh fixation with fibrin glue or other non-invasive/degradable products seems promising for reducing pain and it should be investigated in future randomised trials.

Keywords

Ventral hernia Postoperative pain Convalescence Quality of life and laparoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Carbajo MA, Martín del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, de la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin F, Vaquero C, Inglada L (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13:250–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kulkarni MP, Pawar DK (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1839–1845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R, Erbil Y, Dinccag A, Deveci U, Ozarmagan S, Mercan S (2007) The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11:51–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana GC, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moreno-Egea A, Castillo Bustos JA, Aguayo JL (2002) Day surgery for laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias. Our experience in 300 patients. Hernia 6:21–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Buch KE, Schnur J, Weber KJ, Katz LB, Reiner MA, Aldoroty RA, Herron DM (2008) Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks. JSLS 12:113–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E; European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christensen T, Stage JG, Galbo H, Christensen NJ, Kehlet H (1989) Fatigue and cardiac and endocrine metabolic response to exercise after abdominal surgery. Surgery 105:46–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milojevic KG, Cantineau JP, Ruiz R, Coudert B, Bataille S, Boutot F, Simon N, Lambert Y (2004) Can severe acute pain escape visual analog scale screening in the ED? Am J Emerg Med 22:238–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bjørner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Bech P, Rasmussen NK, Kristensen TS, Modvig J, Thunedborg K (1997) Danish manual for the SF-36. Lægemiddelindustriforeningen, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lomanto D, Iyer SG, Shabbir A, Cheah WK (2006) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1030–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90:261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R, Neugebauer E (1994) Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Surg Endosc 8:90–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lau H, Patil NG (2004) Acute pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty: multivariate analysis of predictive factors. Surg Endosc 18:92–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Witkowski P, Abbonante F, Fedorov I, Sledziński Z, Pejcic V, Slavin L, Adamonis W, Jovanovic S, Smietański M, Slavin D, Trabucco EE (2007) Are mesh anchoring sutures necessary in ventral hernioplasty? Multicenter study. Hernia 11:501–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johanet H, Dabrowski A, Hauters P; Club Coelio (2006) Laparoscopic cure of small ventral hernias with composite mesh. Hernia 10:414–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mussack T, Ladurner R, Vogel T, Lienemann A, Eder-Willwohl A, Hallfeldt KK (2006) Health-related quality-of-life changes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a matched pair analysis. Surg Endosc 20:410–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Müller C, Meurer K, Bauer KH, Papapostolou G, Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes—a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eriksen JR, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2007) Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 11:481–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bisgaard T, Støckel M, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2004) Prospective analysis of convalescence and early pain after uncomplicated laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 91:1473–1478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, Callesen T, Schulze S, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (1999) Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89:1017–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hidalgo M, Castillo MJ, Eymar JL, Hidalgo A (2005) Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty: sutures versus glue. Hernia 9:242–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Guaglio M, Croce E (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142:40–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 19:724–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245:222–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eriksen JR, Bech JI, Linnemann D, Rosenberg J (2008) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel((R))) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs. Hernia May 16. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 21:409–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Eriksen
    • 1
    • 5
  • P. Poornoroozy
    • 2
  • L. N. Jørgensen
    • 3
  • B. Jacobsen
    • 1
  • H. U. Friis-Andersen
    • 4
  • J. Rosenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Gastroenterology DGentofte University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryEsbjerg HospitalEsbjergDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Surgical Gastroenterology KBispebjerg University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryHorsens HospitalHorsensDenmark
  5. 5.RoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations