, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 243–246 | Cite as

Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST®)

  • D. Berger
Original Article



Hernias around ostomies are a very common complication, exceeding 50%. Only a few studies deal with the prophylactic use of mesh to prevent parastomal hernia revealing promising results.

Patients and methods

Twenty-two patients undergoing elective rectal surgery with a permanent colostomy—one with an ileostomy and two needing surgical correction of a preexisting colostomy—were enrolled in a prospective study. A specially designed mesh made of polyvinylidene fluoride with a central whole and a funnel arising (Dynamesh IPST®) was prophylactically implanted using an intraperitoneal onlay technique. The patients were followed for a median of 11 (range 2–19) months by clinical examination every 3 months.


No infection or any other adverse effect was observed, and no parastomal hernia or stoma protrusion could be detected clinically. Twelve patients had a routine computed tomography after 6 months, which also excluded any hernia formation.


The prophylactic use of Dynamesh IPST® is a safe and effective procedure preventing stoma complications such as hernia formation or prolapse, at least in the short run.


Parastomal hernia Prevention Mesh Postoperative complication Prospective observational study 


  1. 1.
    Leslie D (1984) The parastomal hernia. Surg Clin North Am 64:407–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheung MT (1995) Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg 65:808–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kasperk R, Willis S, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Update on incisional hernia. Parastomal hernia. Chirurg 73:895–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81:727–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, de Miguel M, Marti J, Chocarro C (1994) Does the frequency of paracolostomy hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortiz H (1995) Does the difference in muscle structure of the rectus abdominis muscle of patients wearing a colostomy or ileostomy explain the different frequency of parastomal hernias? Int J Colorectal Dis 10:55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sjodahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T (1988) Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 75:339–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B (2001) Collagen I/III and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1 and 13 in the fascia of patients with incisional hernias. J Invest Surg 14:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klinge U, Conze J, Krones CJ, Schumpelick V (2005) Incisional hernia: open techniques. World J Surg 29:1066–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23:3487–3493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V (2001) Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 5:113–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 139:1356–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Israelsson LA (2005) Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 29:1086–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gogenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, Rosenberg J, Fischer A (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1131–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 8:672–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:534–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le Blanc KA (2005) Incisional hernia repair: laparoscopic techniques. World J Surg 29:1073–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21:378–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1661–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryStadtklinikBaden-BadenGermany

Personalised recommendations