Hernia

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 335–339 | Cite as

A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Chronic pain may be a long-term problem related to operative trauma and mesh material in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

Study design

Inguinal hernioplasty was performed under local anesthesia in 228 patients (232 hernias) in day-case surgery by the same surgeon and exactly by the same surgical technique. The patients were randomized to receive either a partly absorbable polypropylene–polyglactin mesh (Vypro IIR 50 g/m2, 79 hernias), a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Premilene Mesh LPR 55 g/m2, 75 hernias) or a conventional densely woven polypropylene mesh (PremileneR 82 g/m2, 78 hernias). Pain, patients discomfort and recurrences of hernias were carefully followed at days 1, 7, 1 month, 1 and 2 years after surgery.

Results

The duration of operation (29–33 min) and the amount of local anesthetic (55–57 ml) were similar in the three groups. Two wound infections and four hematomas were detected with no difference between the meshes. Immediate pain reaction up to 1 month was statistically equal among the three meshes. After 2 years of follow-up, there were five recurrences (two in the Vypro group, one in the Premilene LP and two in the Premilene). A feeling of a foreign body, sensation of pain and patient’s discomfort were similar with all meshes.

Conclusion

There was no difference of pain and quality of life among a conventional polypropylene mesh, lightweight mesh or partly absorbable mesh in 2 years of follow-up, when the same surgeon operated on all patients with exactly the same technique.

Keywords

Hernioplasty Herniorraphy Inguinal Day case surgery Local infiltration anaesthesia Ambulatory surgery Polyglactin Polypropylene Inguinal neuralgia 

References

  1. 1.
    Heikkinen TJ (1998) Costs and early outcome of laparoscopic and open operation in three common surgical conditions. Doctoral Thesis, University of Oulu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheek CM, Black NA, Devlin HB (1998) Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(Suppl 1):S1–S20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin NA 83:1045–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorraphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:1122–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heise CP, Starling JR. (1998) Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorraphy?. J Am Coll Surg 187:514–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Vita G, Milano S, Frazzetta M (2000) Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh. Am J Surg 180:203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nahabedian MY, Dellon AL (1997) Outcome of the operative management of nerve injuries in the ilioinguinal region. J Am Coll Surg 184:265–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morris-Stiff GJ, Hughes LE (1998) The outcomes of nonabsorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience. Am Coll Surg 186:352–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stulz P, Pfeiffer KM (1982) Peripheral nerve injuries resulting from common surgical procedures in the lower portion of the abdomen. Arch Surg 117:324–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grant A, Hernia EU (2000) Trialists collaboration mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 162:447–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorraphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358:1124–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen T (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 96:1056–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, Strobbe LJ, Rosman C (2005) Randomized trial comparing the prolene hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paajanen H (2001) Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy under local infiltration anaestesia as rapid outpatient procedure. Ann Chir Gyn 90:51–54Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paajanen H (2003) Groin hernia repair under local anaesthesia: effect of surgeon’s training level on long-term results. J Ambulatory Surg 10:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finley RK, Miller SF, Jones LM (1999) Elimination of urinary retention following inguinal herniorraphy. Am Surg 57:486–488Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horstmann R, Hellwig M, Classen C, Röttgermann S, Palmes D (2006) Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. World J Surg 30:1742–1749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amid PK (2004) Causes, prevention, and surgical treatment of postherniorraphy neuropathic inguinodynia: triple neurectomy with proximal end implantation. Hernia 8:343–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P, Nyren O, Gunnarsson U (2006) Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg 244:212–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryThe Central Hospital of MikkeliMikkeliFinland

Personalised recommendations