Hernia

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 223–228 | Cite as

Is there a need for a mesh plug in inguinal hernia repair? Randomized, prospective study of the use of Hertra 1 mesh compared to PerFix Plug

  • W. Adamonis
  • P. Witkowski
  • M. Śmietański
  • J. Bigda
  • Z. Śledziński
Original Article

Abstract

Although the mesh plug procedure is an effective operation, sutureless implantation of a single onlay mesh, if successful, would avoid the risks of plug-related complications. One hundred patients with primary inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo PerFix Plug or Hertra 1 implantation. Mean duration of the operation was similar, 38 versus 35 min for plug and onlay mesh implantation, respectively (nonsignificant, NS). The level of postoperative pain and early complication rate was similarly low in both groups (NS). Recurrence rate was the same—2 patients in each group (4%)—all following large hernia repair. The level of long-term discomfort was low after each type of operation (NS). Implantation of the onlay mesh—Hertra 1 as compared to the use of PerFix Plug is simple, safe, and equally effective in small and medium inguinal hernia repair, suggesting that a plug device is not necessary for successful hernia surgery.

Keywords

Mesh plug Inguinal hernia Randomized study Sutureless repair Trabucco Tension-free 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our appreciation to Professor Mark A. Hardy, M.D., Ermanno E. Trabucco, M.D. and Eric Liu, M.D. for their review of the manuscript and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hernia 6:130–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stephenson BM (2003) Complication of open groin hernia repairs. Surg Clin N Am 83:1255–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberod A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg 163:823–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A. (2003) The Millican modified mesh-plug hernioplasty. Arch Surg 138:525–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rutkow IM (2003) The PerFix plug repair groin hernia. Surg Clin N Am 83:1079–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuback JA, Singh RS, Sills C, Dick LS (2000) Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 127:475–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dieter RA Jr (1999) Mesh plug migration in scrotum. Int Surg 84:57–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelissier EP, Blum D, Damas JM, Marre P. (1999) The plug method in inguinal hernia: a prospective evaluation. Hernia 4:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palot JP, Avisse C, Calliez-Tomasi JP, Greffier D FlamentJB (1998) The mesh plug repair of groin hernias: a three year experience. Hernia 2:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amid PK, Lichteinstein IL. (1998) Long-term result and current status of Lichteinstein open tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 2:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amid PK (1999) Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le Blanc KA (2001) Complication associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorhaphy. Hernia 5:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trabucco EE, Trabucco AF (2002) Tension-free sutureless preshaped mesh hernioplasty. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG (eds) Nyhus and Condons hernia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 159–164Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trabucco EE, Trabucco AF. (1998) Flat plug and mesh hernioplasty in the “inguinal box”: description of the surgical technique. Hernia 2:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zollinger Jr RM (2003) Classification system for groin hernias. Surg Clin N Am 83:1053–1063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A. (2001) A prospective study of the Mesh-plug Hernioplasty. Am Surg 67:285–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Callesen T, Bech K, Nielsen R, Andersen J, Hesselfeldt P, Roikjaer O, Kehlet H. (1998) Pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 85:1412–1414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mann DV, Prout J, Havranek E, Gould S, Darzi A. (1998) Late- onset deep prosthetic infection following mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 176:12–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witkowski P, Pirski MI, Adamonis W, Śmietański M, Drączkowski T, Śledziński Z (2000) Mesh plug versus Bassini operation. Randomized prospective study. Hernia 4:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kux M., Fuchsjager N, Schemper M (1994) Shouldice is superior to Bassini inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 168:15–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Millican KW, Diezel DJ. (1996) The management of hernia. Considerations in cost effectiveness. Surg Clin N Am 76:105–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83:1563–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rutkow IM. (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trabucco E, Campanelli P, Cavagnoli R. (1998) New polypropylene hernia prosthesis. Minerva Chir 53(4):337–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Testini M, Miniello S, Piccinni G, Di Venere B, Lissidini G, Greco L, Bonomo GM (2002) Trabucco versus Rutkow versus Lichtenstein techniques in the treatment of groin hernia. A controlled randomized clinical trial. Minerva Chir 57:371–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shin D, Lipshultz LI, Goldstein M, Barme GA, Fuchs EF, Nagler HM, McCallum SW, Niederberger CS, Schoor RA, Brugh VM 3rd, Honig SC (2005) Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg 241(4):553–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Adamonis
    • 1
  • P. Witkowski
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Śmietański
    • 1
  • J. Bigda
    • 1
  • Z. Śledziński
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery and TransplantationMedical University of GdanskGdańskPoland
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations